Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Changing 42t Chainring to 44t on a Commuter

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Changing 42t Chainring to 44t on a Commuter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-06, 01:26 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Changing 42t Chainring to 44t on a Commuter

I have an 1994 Cannondale Killer V900 bike that I am trying to convert to a commuter. The Chainrings are 22*32*42 (94BCD, 5bolts). I am considering changing the 42t to a 44t.

My questions are: 1) Can I find a steel 44t, 94BCD, 5bolts chainring anywhere; 2) Considering that the 42t on there now is a Sugino alloy, would steel 44t clash with the 22t and the 32t alloys; 3)The Shimano LX front derailleur is the original circa 1994 that came with the bike, and I am wondering if the LX derailleur can, with adjustment, take on the extra 2teeth jump that it will be asked to do, without any strain; 4)Do I need new chains? or will the new 2teeth jump work with my present chains sized for the 42t big chainring?

If it helps, I run 12/28, 7-speed cogs, and the bike has an XT rear derailleur.

By the way, I am thinking steel 44t b/cos I understand they last much longer than alloy chainrings, and I am not terribly concerned about weight.

I know some people will think that I should just get rid of the bike, but I am the original owner, have some sentimental attachment to the bike, and paid close to a thousand dollars for it in 1994. Moreover, I just do not like selling stuff.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Jed19 is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 02:00 AM
  #2  
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,849
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
44t, 94bcd is the easy part, there are a bunch of those out there at normal prices ($30 to $70). Steel, however, isn't going to be easy. I would just go for the Al.

Your FD will be fine, it might need to go up just a spot, might not. Remember if you move it you have to adjust the cable as well.

Consult the usual resources (sheldon, park tool) about how to measure how long your chain should be once you have the stuff in hand. You can get away with too short for a little while if you don't use any dumb gear combos, but add a link or replace your chain if the situation calls for it.
Landgolier is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 06:12 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Aluminum chainrings last a long time unless you are riding in extremely harsh, abrasive conditions (like on the beach ). Larger ones last longer than smaller ones too so your should be fine with an Al chainring. As Langolier said, steel is going to be difficult to find as most steel large rings came on super cheap cranks and weren't replaceable.

You will probably have to raise the fd a bit if it's properly set now but it should work fine once adjusted.

As to chain length, you are probably ok. Check that you can shift into your current big-big combination and still have a bit of slack. If it's too tight now, you will have to lengthen it for the new ring.
HillRider is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 11:55 AM
  #4  
cycles per second
 
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930

Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
3) Should work. I run 22x32x46 with an LX FD with no problems.
Gonzo Bob is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 12:37 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 91 Posts
You might want to reconsider even changing. The difference in gear inches between a 42X15 and 44X15 is 3 inches. Basically, you won't be able to feel the difference. If you want bigger gears, go to something around a 52 for the big CR.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 01:06 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
TallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Also, the large chainring doesn't get used as much, as well as having more teeth to spread out the use that it receives, so you may as well go with an alloy 44t. But that said, a 44t won't be much diff than a 42. If you're going to change (I assume b/c you want bigger gears for downhills), go with a 46 at least.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
TallRider is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 01:59 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Gonzo Bob
3) Should work. I run 22x32x46 with an LX FD with no problems.
I would love to have a 22x32x46 combo. I would like to know if you have any problems whatsoever shifting between the 32 and the 46 chainrings. Does the FD perform sluggishly between these two chainrings?

Thanks.

Regards,
Jed19 is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 04:18 PM
  #8  
cycles per second
 
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930

Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
The 32-46 shift is slightly more sluggish than the original 32-42. But that's partly because the 46 is not as "exquisitely" ramped and pinned as the 42. The crank and original rings are Shimano Deore LX and the 46 is a CODA ring I got cheap on eBay.
Gonzo Bob is offline  
Old 05-05-06, 07:22 PM
  #9  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,326 Times in 837 Posts
Definitely use aluminum on your two outer rings, and do your heavy torquing/grinding in your inner ring.

42/12x26 gives you a 91-inch top gear, which is low even by my standards. A 44T ring would bring you up to a 95 gear-inches, which I find adequate. (I have 104 on one Capo, 100 on the PKN-10, 96 on the mountain bike and the Bianchi, 94 on the other Capo, and 93 on the UO-8.)
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 05-06-06, 11:54 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by John E
Definitely use aluminum on your two outer rings, and do your heavy torquing/grinding in your inner ring.

42/12x26 gives you a 91-inch top gear, which is low even by my standards. A 44T ring would bring you up to a 95 gear-inches, which I find adequate. (I have 104 on one Capo, 100 on the PKN-10, 96 on the mountain bike and the Bianchi, 94 on the other Capo, and 93 on the UO-8.)
Actually, I am now thinking of taking out the whole crank and replacing it with the Sugino XD300 in 26x36x46.

I hope I do not have to buy a new BB to mount the Sugino. The 26x36x46 will be just perfect for the kind of riding I want to do. I envision using the bike as a comfortable spinner/exercise bike. The only problem is that the Sugino XD300 (26x36x46) only comes with either 175mm or 170mm cranks. I would have loved it with a 172.5mm crank. Anyway, I am thinking of getting a 170mm. I think that will make for a perfect spinner, as I am about 5' 10" with a cycling inseam of 34inches and size 12 shoes.

What do you people think of the Sugino XD300 (26x36x46)? It has steel chainrings by the way.

Thanks.

Regards,
Jed19 is offline  
Old 06-09-06, 05:07 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
godspiral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 876
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LUCAS
Actually, I am now thinking of taking out the whole crank and replacing it with the Sugino XD300 in 26x36x46.
If you want just a spinning bike than a single 52T would do.

I have a 47-38-28, and think that is a silly design. It basically gives just 2 extra gears on the big and little cranks. I don't understand why they make cranks that narrow. 42-32-22 at least gives 3 extra gears on bottom and 2.5 on top. I just dont understand why the default cranks aren't set up much wider than they are.

I liked your original idea of just changing the larger crankwheel to bigger.
godspiral is offline  
Old 06-09-06, 06:00 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
For a better high gear, my first suggestion is to switch to an 11-28 or 11-30 rear cassette. The 11 is a significant improvement over a 12. You'll want a new chain to go with that, I'd get a Sachs PC-58. At that age, you might need a very thin ~1mm spacer behind the cassette for it to use up all the space on the cassette body and snug down.

For a front chainring, here's a killer deal: https://www.cambriabike.com/shopexd.asp?id=10218 These are very, very durable rings, made of hard 7075 aluminum plus they're nickel-plated on top of that. And that is an excellent price. They won't shift as smoothly as a pinned-&-ramped Shimano, but they'll outlast it, and for a dirt-cheap price too.
mechBgon is offline  
Old 06-09-06, 08:15 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,018
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sometimes you can get chainrings on eBay cheap. You can just buy a few rings and try them out. Resell the ones you don't want. I would cruise ebay and froogle.
geo8rge is offline  
Old 06-09-06, 08:31 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'd go with the new Sugino crank and new a new bottom bracket as well-- should cost you under $100 and you'll be set with nice new stuff that will last for a long time-- longer than the bike will last maybe. Oh, well, that crank can always be put on the next bike!
tacomee is offline  
Old 06-09-06, 08:33 PM
  #15  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017

Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by HillRider
Aluminum chainrings last a long time unless you are riding in extremely harsh, abrasive conditions (like on the beach ).
NOt just on the beach. I ride mainly on dirt and gravel roads and just had to replace my middle aluminum ring on my mountain bike. It wasn't even a year old yet.
Portis is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.