2003 XTR Group
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,481
Likes: 3
From: Pennsylvania
Bikes: Too many to list!
2003 XTR Group
Thus far I've only seen pictures and read about this all new groupo. Does anyone have any real-world experience? The components that are giving me some stress are the new shifter/brake levers and the rapid-rise derailier. From what I've read:
- One pushes down on the STI-type levers to go to a higher (smaller cog - lower on the cassette) gear
- One pushes up on the levers to go to a lower (bigger cog - higher on the cassette) gear
- One now cannot downshift (bigger cog - higher on the cassette) multiple gears @ once, but one can upshift (smaller cog - lower on the cassette) up to 3 gears @ once.
So my questions are:
- Am I correct with these statements?
- One can apparently still use a (now redundant) thumb shifter. Does that shift to a higher (smaller cog - lower on the cassette) or a lower (bigger cog - higher on the cassette) gear?
- How do you like this new arrangement?
- Do you have any other comments on the XTR groupo?
ThanX a bunch!!!!!!
- One pushes down on the STI-type levers to go to a higher (smaller cog - lower on the cassette) gear
- One pushes up on the levers to go to a lower (bigger cog - higher on the cassette) gear
- One now cannot downshift (bigger cog - higher on the cassette) multiple gears @ once, but one can upshift (smaller cog - lower on the cassette) up to 3 gears @ once.
So my questions are:
- Am I correct with these statements?
- One can apparently still use a (now redundant) thumb shifter. Does that shift to a higher (smaller cog - lower on the cassette) or a lower (bigger cog - higher on the cassette) gear?
- How do you like this new arrangement?
- Do you have any other comments on the XTR groupo?
ThanX a bunch!!!!!!
#2
No clue on rapid rise or the new STI's. My drivetrain is '02 XTR, except the crankset which is '03.
So far it's held up very well. I have ~110 miles on it so far, and the only sign of it is some light rubbing from my shoes. Obviously it's going to get worse quick, but it adds character
One problem was the chainline on my bike was right-of-center. The included spacers pushed everything out too far. (There are 3 spacers included with the crankset. 2 go on the drive-side, 1 on the non-drive.) I had to reverse the spacers and put 2 on the non-drive side and 1 one the drive-side to get an even chainline. As it sits now, the entire crankset is a couple mm's off center on the bike, but I don't notice it. I guess it's the price you pay for the integrated unit...the benefits being the lighter weight and wider spaced bearings.
So far it's held up very well. I have ~110 miles on it so far, and the only sign of it is some light rubbing from my shoes. Obviously it's going to get worse quick, but it adds character
One problem was the chainline on my bike was right-of-center. The included spacers pushed everything out too far. (There are 3 spacers included with the crankset. 2 go on the drive-side, 1 on the non-drive.) I had to reverse the spacers and put 2 on the non-drive side and 1 one the drive-side to get an even chainline. As it sits now, the entire crankset is a couple mm's off center on the bike, but I don't notice it. I guess it's the price you pay for the integrated unit...the benefits being the lighter weight and wider spaced bearings.
#4
Footballus vita est

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 7
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: Trek 4500, Kona Dawg
I'm still quite warry of the 2003 xtr, but those cranks sure have a pretty finish on them!
__________________
"The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad
"The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad
#5
Still kicking.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.
It's just my opinion, but I feel like Shimano tried to fix something that wasn't broken. This is also the same reason I'm going to be switching to Sram for 2004.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#9
But unlike Apple, Shimano has claim on almost the entire high-end market. Walmart bikes use Gripshift, Cannondale's come (or used to) with it. I'm unable to think of anything else that does. If anyone was going to pull something like this off (making all the other manufacturers' products obsolete) Shimano is in a great position to do it. Everyone I see jumping on this new line of products worries me.
[edit]
I on the other hand, am not even a little afraid to bucher a thread
[edit]
I on the other hand, am not even a little afraid to bucher a thread
#10
Has anyone here actually used the new shifters? I hear they're not all that bad. I think it would be nice to keep your index finger on the brake for shifting. Granted the price is high, but when the new system trickles down to XT, I'm sure it'll be lower.
Disliking it because it doesn't work is one thing...but don't dismiss it just because it's new and different.
Disliking it because it doesn't work is one thing...but don't dismiss it just because it's new and different.
#11
Wood Licker


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Originally posted by schnell
Has anyone here actually used the new shifters? I hear they're not all that bad. I think it would be nice to keep your index finger on the brake for shifting. Granted the price is high, but when the new system trickles down to XT, I'm sure it'll be lower.
Disliking it because it doesn't work is one thing...but don't dismiss it just because it's new and different.
Has anyone here actually used the new shifters? I hear they're not all that bad. I think it would be nice to keep your index finger on the brake for shifting. Granted the price is high, but when the new system trickles down to XT, I'm sure it'll be lower.
Disliking it because it doesn't work is one thing...but don't dismiss it just because it's new and different.
The price isn't high its ridiculous...I don't eve dismiss it because of price. If you want to run their drive train you need to run the entire system (especially if you run xtx). I hate being forced to run stuff. This TOTAL proprietary requirement is what pisses me off about it. Whether the system is good or not is irrelevant
Last edited by Maelstrom; 05-10-03 at 04:47 PM.
#12
Wood Licker


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Originally posted by DiL
But unlike Apple, Shimano has claim on almost the entire high-end market.
But unlike Apple, Shimano has claim on almost the entire high-end market.
...
Everyone I see jumping on this new line of products worries me.
...I just want shimano to pull their head out of their ass and offer choices...I hate being painted into a corner by a company. Sram is really no better with their grip shift but IF they come out with a good working rapid fire that will really impress me.
#13
It may not be the best option for freeriding or DH, so I agree that it was a bad move to completely do away with rapid-fire. But from an XC perspective, it sounds like a cool system. I guess I'm a dying breed 
What about Saint? Do you already dislike that, or are you going to test it out first?

What about Saint? Do you already dislike that, or are you going to test it out first?
#14
Wood Licker


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Originally posted by schnell
It may not be the best option for freeriding or DH, so I agree that it was a bad move to completely do away with rapid-fire. But from an XC perspective, it sounds like a cool system. I guess I'm a dying breed
It may not be the best option for freeriding or DH, so I agree that it was a bad move to completely do away with rapid-fire. But from an XC perspective, it sounds like a cool system. I guess I'm a dying breed

And in fact is very inventive...What about Saint? Do you already dislike that, or are you going to test it out first?
1 - propietary spline on the bb requiring proprietary chain guide requiring proprietary crank and heck it may even have a proprietary hole configuration meaning fews choices for chain rings.
2 - On the rear end. Deraileur attached to hub (I think this is dumb) so proprietary hub/deraileur...I would be surprised if they don't come out with a way to make a proprietary chain.
3 - The shifters...I already said enough about this....
So in short...yes I already dislike it
#15
Still kicking.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.
Well, come Tuesday, I will be officially Shimano less. The parts needed will be in. Will I be able to ride it for awhile. Nope thanks to a strained acl. I will ride but not mash.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#16
I don't like how Shimano asked for a fix to a problem that never existed. I haven't tried them, and I don't want to. My biggest beef is them trying to FORCE everyone into only using Shimano parts. Like their rotors that conveiniently ONLY fit their hubs. Now that their monopoly on the high-end mountain bike parts market is slowly disappearing they're struggling to hold onto it. There are companies making as good (If not better) parts for less money. I'd rather send my money to the underdog, and hopefully a company that's in the USA. Just because a company isn't massive doesn't mean it doesn't make good parts!
#17
Still kicking.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.
Originally posted by Jim311
I don't like how Shimano asked for a fix to a problem that never existed. I haven't tried them, and I don't want to. My biggest beef is them trying to FORCE everyone into only using Shimano parts. Like their rotors that conveiniently ONLY fit their hubs. Now that their monopoly on the high-end mountain bike parts market is slowly disappearing they're struggling to hold onto it. There are companies making as good (If not better) parts for less money. I'd rather send my money to the underdog, and hopefully a company that's in the USA. Just because a company isn't massive doesn't mean it doesn't make good parts!
I don't like how Shimano asked for a fix to a problem that never existed. I haven't tried them, and I don't want to. My biggest beef is them trying to FORCE everyone into only using Shimano parts. Like their rotors that conveiniently ONLY fit their hubs. Now that their monopoly on the high-end mountain bike parts market is slowly disappearing they're struggling to hold onto it. There are companies making as good (If not better) parts for less money. I'd rather send my money to the underdog, and hopefully a company that's in the USA. Just because a company isn't massive doesn't mean it doesn't make good parts!
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#18
Oh, and by the way.... apparently not too many people are using the Shimano disc brake system simply because you have to use their levers, hubs, etc. I don't think it's a coincidence that soon they are going to be offering their rotors in the international 6-bolt standard pattern.
#19
Originally posted by schnell
Has anyone here actually used the new shifters? I hear they're not all that bad. I think it would be nice to keep your index finger on the brake for shifting. Granted the price is high, but when the new system trickles down to XT, I'm sure it'll be lower.
Disliking it because it doesn't work is one thing...but don't dismiss it just because it's new and different.
Has anyone here actually used the new shifters? I hear they're not all that bad. I think it would be nice to keep your index finger on the brake for shifting. Granted the price is high, but when the new system trickles down to XT, I'm sure it'll be lower.
Disliking it because it doesn't work is one thing...but don't dismiss it just because it's new and different.
Since we're riding this Apple theme, I'll use it again. I wish I owned a Mac. When it comes to video editing they simply cannot be beat. There are programs for PC that do it, but they can't compare to their Mac counterparts. However, I won't buy a Mac because they play the greedy proprietary game. Love the product, hate the manufacturer would be another way to say it.
I would think the same would apply to the Saint line. Some of the ideas were better than others, but on a whole I think people liked the innovative ideas. But no one wants to help Shimano dominate a market.
#20
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,481
Likes: 3
From: Pennsylvania
Bikes: Too many to list!
Originally posted by schnell
No clue on rapid rise or the new STI's. My drivetrain is '02 XTR, except the crankset which is '03.
No clue on rapid rise or the new STI's. My drivetrain is '02 XTR, except the crankset which is '03.
ThanX!!
#21
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,481
Likes: 3
From: Pennsylvania
Bikes: Too many to list!
Holy cow - now I'm really confused! 
I'm buying a new bike that I would like to fit with the XTR group. However, I'm scared that I will not like the new STI shifter/brake levers and the rapid-rise derailier.
If I find that I do not like this set-up. Would it be possible to get the entire 03 XTR group, but substitute the 02 XTR shifters, brake levers and derailier? In other words, will there be any compatibility problems with this type of set-up??
ThanX again guys!!!!

I'm buying a new bike that I would like to fit with the XTR group. However, I'm scared that I will not like the new STI shifter/brake levers and the rapid-rise derailier.
If I find that I do not like this set-up. Would it be possible to get the entire 03 XTR group, but substitute the 02 XTR shifters, brake levers and derailier? In other words, will there be any compatibility problems with this type of set-up??
ThanX again guys!!!!
#22
Zippy Engineer


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 0
From: IN
Bikes: Bianchi 928, Bianchi Pista Concept 2004, Surly Steamroller, 1998 Schwinn Factory Team Homegrown, 1999 Schwinn Homegrown Factory, 2000 Schwinn Panther, Niner EMD9
While you cannot downshift multiple gears at once with the new system, many people (including Specialized) are using last year's non Rapid Rise rear derailleur to remedy this.
The thumb shifter is intended as a learning crutch and is removable. Our customers have done away with it quickly and never looked back.
I am personally not a huge fan of the new setup-I want to have more flexibility in levers, etc. Shimano makes great stuff, I just don't want to be forced to use only their components. Rapid Rise works great for me-I've got one of last year's derailleurs and I've had no trouble at all with it. I've ridden the new setup on a couple occasions and have found it to work well, but I don't have any desire to switch to this configuration.
For the SRAM folks, they are coming out with triggers that will work with Shimano derailleurs.
The thumb shifter is intended as a learning crutch and is removable. Our customers have done away with it quickly and never looked back.
I am personally not a huge fan of the new setup-I want to have more flexibility in levers, etc. Shimano makes great stuff, I just don't want to be forced to use only their components. Rapid Rise works great for me-I've got one of last year's derailleurs and I've had no trouble at all with it. I've ridden the new setup on a couple occasions and have found it to work well, but I don't have any desire to switch to this configuration.
For the SRAM folks, they are coming out with triggers that will work with Shimano derailleurs.
#24
Wood Licker


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Originally posted by Waldo
While you cannot downshift multiple gears at once with the new system, many people (including Specialized) are using last year's non Rapid Rise rear derailleur to remedy this.
The thumb shifter is intended as a learning crutch and is removable. Our customers have done away with it quickly and never looked back.
I am personally not a huge fan of the new setup-I want to have more flexibility in levers, etc. Shimano makes great stuff, I just don't want to be forced to use only their components. Rapid Rise works great for me-I've got one of last year's derailleurs and I've had no trouble at all with it. I've ridden the new setup on a couple occasions and have found it to work well, but I don't have any desire to switch to this configuration.
For the SRAM folks, they are coming out with triggers that will work with Shimano derailleurs.
While you cannot downshift multiple gears at once with the new system, many people (including Specialized) are using last year's non Rapid Rise rear derailleur to remedy this.
The thumb shifter is intended as a learning crutch and is removable. Our customers have done away with it quickly and never looked back.
I am personally not a huge fan of the new setup-I want to have more flexibility in levers, etc. Shimano makes great stuff, I just don't want to be forced to use only their components. Rapid Rise works great for me-I've got one of last year's derailleurs and I've had no trouble at all with it. I've ridden the new setup on a couple occasions and have found it to work well, but I don't have any desire to switch to this configuration.
For the SRAM folks, they are coming out with triggers that will work with Shimano derailleurs.
#25
Part of the furniture

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
From: Exeter UK, Athens Greece.
Bikes: Specialized RH, Scott Unitrack
I Agree with the proprietary stuff on XTR and Saint...i dont like them at all. However i wont dislike shimano for that. so far it produces marvelous products for me ( XT , XT discs , Deore.). No one touches shimano on these series. If shimano screws up with new XT LX etc...and if SRAM or any other come up with something trustworthy ...then shimano will die for me.




