Bottom Bracket Smooth, but...
#1
On Two Wheels
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 514
Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Bianchi Volpe, 2 Salsa Casserolls (fixed & Triple), 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso, 1983 Schwinn Supersport, Schwinn Mesa MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bottom Bracket Smooth, but...
I've got a Truvativ Giga Pipe Ti bottom braket that turns very smoothly, but with a noticable resistance when compared to my old Ultegra 9-spd bottom brackets. It's been that way for over 2000 miles and turns the same installed or not.
So, I bought a Truvativ Giga Pipe team SL and it feels similar; smooth, but with resistance. Like it's in thick grease.
Did a crank conversion on a friend's bike and have a left over FSA Platinum bottom bracket. It has noticably less resistance, but maybe not as easily as the Ultegra.
Are these Truvativ bottom brackets steeling what little power I have?!
What's a good choice for an ISIS BB for road use?
So, I bought a Truvativ Giga Pipe team SL and it feels similar; smooth, but with resistance. Like it's in thick grease.
Did a crank conversion on a friend's bike and have a left over FSA Platinum bottom bracket. It has noticably less resistance, but maybe not as easily as the Ultegra.
Are these Truvativ bottom brackets steeling what little power I have?!
What's a good choice for an ISIS BB for road use?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
92 Posts
Dang good question. I too would like some suggestions. I installed a Truvativ Gigapipe about nine months back and as I spin the spindle with my fingers, it's smooth, but stiff. I've learned to live with it and consider it a "training feature". When it's off the bike it spins easier, but once mounted, it stiffens. The original bottom bracket was always easy to spin. I've installed it the recommended installtion torque, too. I'm hoping my bottom bracket shell is not distorting it.
I looked up bottom brackets on https://www.mtbr.com/reviews/bottom_bracket/ and it seems most of the more common ISIS BBs (Race Face, Truvativ, FSA) had extremely poor ratings and common talk of bearing failure measured in months. As a corollary to the original post:
1. Why do ISIS BBs have such poor quality (or is it just a few disgruntled riders complaining the loudest?)
2, BBs are relatively simple - spindle, cartrdige bearings, seals, and cups - what can go wrong?
I looked up bottom brackets on https://www.mtbr.com/reviews/bottom_bracket/ and it seems most of the more common ISIS BBs (Race Face, Truvativ, FSA) had extremely poor ratings and common talk of bearing failure measured in months. As a corollary to the original post:
1. Why do ISIS BBs have such poor quality (or is it just a few disgruntled riders complaining the loudest?)
2, BBs are relatively simple - spindle, cartrdige bearings, seals, and cups - what can go wrong?
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
No worry about a little seal drag in the bottom bracket. As I recall, Velonews quantified the power loss to be all of 1 Watt from this. My farts generate more power than that so I don't waste time thinking it.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MudPie
Dang good question. I too would like some suggestions. I installed a Truvativ Gigapipe about nine months back and as I spin the spindle with my fingers, it's smooth, but stiff. I've learned to live with it and consider it a "training feature". When it's off the bike it spins easier, but once mounted, it stiffens. The original bottom bracket was always easy to spin. I've installed it the recommended installtion torque, too. I'm hoping my bottom bracket shell is not distorting it.
I looked up bottom brackets on https://www.mtbr.com/reviews/bottom_bracket/ and it seems most of the more common ISIS BBs (Race Face, Truvativ, FSA) had extremely poor ratings and common talk of bearing failure measured in months. As a corollary to the original post:
1. Why do ISIS BBs have such poor quality (or is it just a few disgruntled riders complaining the loudest?)
2, BBs are relatively simple - spindle, cartrdige bearings, seals, and cups - what can go wrong?
I looked up bottom brackets on https://www.mtbr.com/reviews/bottom_bracket/ and it seems most of the more common ISIS BBs (Race Face, Truvativ, FSA) had extremely poor ratings and common talk of bearing failure measured in months. As a corollary to the original post:
1. Why do ISIS BBs have such poor quality (or is it just a few disgruntled riders complaining the loudest?)
2, BBs are relatively simple - spindle, cartrdige bearings, seals, and cups - what can go wrong?