Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Is there still a stimga to triple cranks?

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Is there still a stimga to triple cranks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-07, 09:37 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fat_bike_nut
Weight weenie? I don't think we'd be able to afford being weight weenies
Hey, for this clyde, the place, where the bike is going to get the most bang for the buck in the weight loss game, is the engine
Wogster is offline  
Old 03-08-07, 11:12 PM
  #27  
MAK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,695

Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Liked 106 Times in 65 Posts
I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

As for the extra weight...mine came from Guiness and Twinkies; a third ring is the least of my problems
MAK is offline  
Old 03-09-07, 02:24 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco!
Posts: 909

Bikes: 2010 Surly LHT (main rider and do-everything bike), 2011 Bike Friday NWT (back-up bike and multi-modal)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wogsterca
Hey, for this clyde, the place, where the bike is going to get the most bang for the buck in the weight loss game, is the engine
Ah, true. Same here. Once this engine loses about 60 lbs., the bike oughta be able to just FLY!
fat_bike_nut is offline  
Old 03-09-07, 07:16 AM
  #29  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 237
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not if its on a mountain bike.

On a road bike, absolutely.
jit5 is offline  
Old 03-09-07, 07:17 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 1,010 Posts
Originally Posted by fat_bike_nut
Ah, true. Same here. Once this engine loses about 60 lbs., the bike oughta be able to just FLY!
I know mine is much faster, down almost 75, reduced bike weight about 11 lbs and moved to smaller tires, from 38's to 700-28. Doing a 15.1 avg on my last 3 rides. I was doing about anywhere between 11 and 13.3.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.



jaxgtr is offline  
Old 03-09-07, 04:05 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fat_bike_nut
Ah, true. Same here. Once this engine loses about 60 lbs., the bike oughta be able to just FLY!
60lbs would put me at about 180, 10lbs above target, would definitely make the bike run better
Wogster is offline  
Old 03-09-07, 04:12 PM
  #32  
Third World Layabout
 
crtreedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 3,136

Bikes: Cannondale F900 and Tandem

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 22 Posts
As all have already said - leave it on and if you use it, why, that is why it is there. If you don't use it - you can think about removing it.

As far as if some skinny person laughs at you - you are a clyde after all - puny Banner types tend to be polite toward us for some reason.
crtreedude is offline  
Old 03-10-07, 12:24 PM
  #33  
Yes it is a paradox
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 361

Bikes: Trek, Orbea,Specilized

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A person is not looked down on if they have a tripple. It is about how you ride. If you ride solo who cares. If you ride in groups the only concern is keeping up with the group. Use what you need. I have a bike with a triple and a bike with a compact double. I now like the compact double because it shifts better than the triple and is easier to keep in adjustment. If I had not started on a triple I would not have been able to move up to the double.
SlowSpinner is offline  
Old 03-10-07, 03:31 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
I_Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 244

Bikes: RANS Dynamik

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
I think the stigma is on those who make an issue of whether one uses a triple or not - they tend to be considered a$$hats.
You know - nothing more needs to be said. Though I prefer "a$$clowns" in that context.
I_Bike is offline  
Old 03-10-07, 05:00 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
socalrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: La Verne CA
Posts: 5,049

Bikes: Litespeed Liege, Motorola Team Issue Eddy Mercxk, Santana Noventa Tandem, Fisher Supercaliber Mtn. Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Compact cranks made the road bike much nicer as far as gearing. You get a pretty good range with a 50/34 and 11-27 cassette.. I have a triple on my cross bike because there is no way I could make it some of the trails without a triple..

Personally ride with what is comfortable.. If you need the extra gearing for the hills, use a triple..
socalrider is offline  
Old 03-10-07, 06:52 PM
  #36  
Senior Curmudgeon
 
FarHorizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posts: 3,856

Bikes: Varies by day

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fat_bike_nut
...using a Triple or not really depends on your terrain...but it is really not needed in the flatlands of Florida
^ +1 for this advice. If you need or want a triple, there's no reason not to have one. If you live where things are completely flat (as fat_bike_nut and I do) then a single chain ring is plenty.
__________________
Nishiki road bike, Raleigh road bike, Electra Cruiser Lux 7d, Electra Townie 3i, Electra Townie 1, Whatever I find today!
FarHorizon is offline  
Old 03-11-07, 12:09 AM
  #37  
mud for me
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 9

Bikes: Kona JTS 05

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This winter I have ridden four days a week and come in at a cool 240lbs. With a 30 mph head wind I sure could have used a triple several times this winter. Who cares what the studs think...we always will smoke em on the down hill anyway!
norse rider is offline  
Old 03-11-07, 12:57 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 987
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
faster bike

Originally Posted by jit5
Not if its on a mountain bike.

On a road bike, absolutely.
Or a recumbent....they are the fastest!
charles vail is offline  
Old 03-11-07, 08:58 AM
  #39  
jcm
Gemutlichkeit
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You're kidding, right? Keep the triple. Heck, I'd love a nice old set of BioPace road-rings! If I were ever to catch anyone snootin' at me I'd just Mad Dog 'em right back. Besides, I never usually give them any other view but from behind...

Hey, C'com - who's got the rabies there?
jcm is offline  
Old 03-11-07, 09:10 AM
  #40  
Fred
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, PRM
Posts: 277

Bikes: 1983 Schwinn Super Sp0rt, Trek hybrid, eBike, Xootr

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Even in Boston, where there is a very active fixed gear / custom bike subculture blessed with the certainty of youth, triples don't raise many eyebrows.
Garandman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.