Trek Fuel EX8 vs. Spec. Stumpjumper fsr comp
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trek Fuel EX8 vs. Spec. Stumpjumper fsr comp
This question probably exists elsewhere but I'm new and I can't find it
anyway...
I have been looking at both the Fuel EX8 and the Stumpjumper FSR comp. Both seem like really nice bikes. I ride in eastern PA, on pretty roungh trails, and I am pretty tough on my equipment. I currently ride a hardtail and have never ridden a dual-suspention bike. I am pretty familiar with the set-ups of both bikes and am just looking for some owner opinions and the like.
Thanks
anyway...
I have been looking at both the Fuel EX8 and the Stumpjumper FSR comp. Both seem like really nice bikes. I ride in eastern PA, on pretty roungh trails, and I am pretty tough on my equipment. I currently ride a hardtail and have never ridden a dual-suspention bike. I am pretty familiar with the set-ups of both bikes and am just looking for some owner opinions and the like.
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 209
Bikes: 70s Motobecane and '06 Enduro (and a kickass little pink and purple schwinn)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stumpjumper, as hard as I try to destroy it it just won't die.
#3
It is what it is...
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 811
Bikes: Trek 6500 w/ stuff
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
It is what it is...
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 811
Bikes: Trek 6500 w/ stuff
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 2,265
Bikes: 2010 Tarmac SL, 2013 Fairdale Weekender, 2013 Fairdale Coaster, 1995 Specialized M2 Pro, 1972 Schwinn Heavy Duty, 2014 Surley Long Haul Trucker
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by TheFlip
Stumpjumper, as hard as I try to destroy it it just won't die.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 1,321
Bikes: Cervelo S5 SRAM Red -
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i tried both and went with the trek> rides much better up hills and feels more responsive...to me. try them both.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Novi, Michigan
Posts: 459
Bikes: Trek '06 2100ZR, 7.5FX, '05 Fuel EX8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I love my '05 Fuel EX8, it climbs, handles, and rides great, the '07 looks even better. Go ride them if you can.
#10
Big Ring Circus
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 218
Bikes: Tarmac Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ride'm both.
I am biased towards the Stumpy...I own one. Its a great all around bike. Does everything well, but nothing great. Its a comfy bike, well-suited for all day rides through the rough stuff.
I've heard great things about the Trek's ability to climb. This is the piece I think the Stumpy lacks the most.
I am biased towards the Stumpy...I own one. Its a great all around bike. Does everything well, but nothing great. Its a comfy bike, well-suited for all day rides through the rough stuff.
I've heard great things about the Trek's ability to climb. This is the piece I think the Stumpy lacks the most.