Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

The 60-40 split

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

The 60-40 split

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-07, 01:31 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Newspaperguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The 60-40 split

A number of people around here recommend loading 60 per cent of the weight on the front and 40 per cent on the back. I'd like to understand the reasoning for this. My setup has at least 75 per cent in the rear with just a handlebar bag, my tent and some water in front.

I've seen all sorts of rigs on the road but the majority have most or all of the gear in the rear. I haven't yet seen any with the bulk of the weight in front.
Newspaperguy is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 01:35 PM
  #2  
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I believe one of the reasons is that the rear wheel is already under extra stress compared to the front wheel when unloaded, with most of the rider weight on the rear wheel, dishing due to the casette and torque from the drive train.

From that stand point it is logical that it would be better to put the load on the front wheel to equal the loads on them
finnen is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 01:36 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
ken cummings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: northern California
Posts: 5,603

Bikes: Bruce Gordon BLT, Cannondale parts bike, Ecodyne recumbent trike, Counterpoint Opus 2, miyata 1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dense, heavy stuff like food, water, and equipment can be up front with cloths and sleeping bags in back. Handlebar bags would also count as up front weight. When grinding up steep grades front weight helps keeping the front wheel from lifting off the ground.

Try Sheldon Brown's web site and ask him the same question.
ken cummings is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 01:39 PM
  #4  
Lentement mais sûrement
 
Erick L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
The reasonning is that the rear wheel already takes most of the rider's weight and the front wheel is stronger as it's not dished. I doubt many actually take the time to balance their load 60-40. Personnally, I just stuff as much dense object in front and the rest in the back. So my bike may look more loaded in the back but it's all fluff (sleeping bag and mat, clothing, tent) while the front has food, stove, camera and accessories, stove, toileteries, etc.
Erick L is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 03:20 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 158 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
ok ,so why then,, is the back panniers ,bigger than the front ones.
antokelly is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 07:15 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
That's a good question. antokelly. I use panniers that are the same size frount and back. It also keeps the trouble with heel strike and pack weight low.
tacomee is offline  
Old 08-15-07, 07:52 PM
  #7  
ChainringTattoo
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride about a 40/60 or 30/70 (front/back), mostly because I have a really strong rear wheel and great rear rack. On the front, I have a much less robust wheel and an $8 ebay rack clamped on a non braze on fork. If I had a "real" touring bike, I'd put more weight in the front.

I, too, am getting rid of my giant back bags and cutting pack weight so I'm down to 4 small bags or 2 small bags and one dry-bag on the rear rack. I'll work on figuring that out this winter!
imafencer is offline  
Old 08-16-07, 12:32 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London
Posts: 252

Bikes: Thorn Club Thorn

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
After not knowing what the fuss was all about, and quite happy with my rear sack and back rack only, I thought I should try this new school of thought, 60/40 or front racks as well since I am going to land in Venice, IT and ride back to London going over the Alps. Well I bought front Ortiliebs and loaded it accordingly and what a huge difference it made. Better control on the steering, totally unexpected, climbing was also much easier and it makes me look too loaded as my sleeping bag etc. is in the rear, all fluff as stated earlier. This is also a great way of organising the stuff. All the kitchen is up front, sleeping bag and clothes rear one side and the rest rear other side.
For me now its the only way to go. If it was not for all these post, I think I would have never tried this as I thought I was OK the way I was. So a big thank you to all.
JoeLonghair is offline  
Old 08-16-07, 04:20 PM
  #9  
Coffee Powered commuter
 
markus_mudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 46

Bikes: Yuba Mundo, Catrike Villager, Easy Racers Tour Easy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just a couple o' answers to the question of why rear panniers are bigger......1) There's "fluffy" stuff that sometimes goes on tour too. Some clothing items or a few bags of Doritos come to mind. It's the stuff that's bulky but not too heavy. Sleeping pad/bag, tarps, etc. 2) Big panniers just fit better on the rear than they do on the front.


I have an Xtracyle and pay no attention to the loading rules.
markus_mudd is offline  
Old 08-16-07, 06:15 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Newspaperguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
For those of you who use front and rear panniers, do you find yourselves packing more gear because of the capacity? The space in two rear panniers limits what a rider can take in terms of weight and bulk.
Newspaperguy is offline  
Old 08-16-07, 06:25 PM
  #11  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Newspaperguy
For those of you who use front and rear panniers, do you find yourselves packing more gear because of the capacity? The space in two rear panniers limits what a rider can take in terms of weight and bulk.
It is easy to do if you aren't disciplined about it. Over the years I developed a couple of techniques borrowed from backpacking...there is a list of basics that ALWAYS goes every thing else is trip dependent. If I take something on two trips and it doesn't get used, it gets left behind on the next one. I tour two ways, completely self contained, which runs my load into the 75# range. If I am going to be spending nights in frequent hotels, or meeting someone with supplies along the way, traveling in a more populated area I can pare it down to the 60# range. But I have a tendency to pack extra stuff.

What is amazing to me is that I used to ride out to a farm on the edge of town when I was kid with nothing more than a couple of PBJ's an old army blanket, poncho and a canteen of water

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 08-16-07, 10:49 PM
  #12  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,217 Times in 2,364 Posts
Originally Posted by antokelly
ok ,so why then,, is the back panniers ,bigger than the front ones.

Because people look at a bike and think that the bike should only have bags on the back. Ergo, the back bags are bigger. Honest!

There's no real reason not to carry the same sized bags front and rear. However, I like having slightly larger bags on back (not huge just a little bigger) because that's where bulky, lightweight stuff goes.

As for the exactness of the split, for actual touring, I'm not too exact about it. For training, I am because I can regulate the weight much better. Right now I'm carrying 30 lb of weight in preparation for a tour in September. I have exactly 18 lb in the front and exactly 12 lb in the back. I have 8 two pound bags of rice and 2 one pound bags up front and 6 two pound bags in the back. The bike just handles better that way. The front end is stable and predictable while climbing or descending while the back doesn't want to 'wag the dog'. It's one of those things that you just can't believe it works until you try it.

I purchased a first generation Blackburn lowrider long ago and my touring bike went from a handful to control to a well mannered ride. With a stiffer frame like the bike I have now (a T800), the bike rides like, to use the cliche', it's on rails. Point it down a hill, pedal until you can't spin any faster and enjoy the high speed ride! It's been a long time since I've ridden with a load only on the back but I still remember how scary a fast downhill was. I wouldn't go back

Try it. It really does make a difference.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 08-16-07, 10:53 PM
  #13  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6218 Post(s)
Liked 4,217 Times in 2,364 Posts
Originally Posted by Newspaperguy
For those of you who use front and rear panniers, do you find yourselves packing more gear because of the capacity? The space in two rear panniers limits what a rider can take in terms of weight and bulk.
Use small fronts and some discipline. I carry more than I probably should but I'd rather carry a little extra and only have to do laundry every 3 days. That's where my extra weight comes from. Cook and camp gear is pretty much set and the amount of food I carry is generally about the same from day to day.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 08-17-07, 08:32 AM
  #14  
spinspinspinspin
 
fatbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 880
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by antokelly
ok ,so why then,, is the back panniers ,bigger than the front ones.
Really wide panniers on the front wheel could cause steering issues in sidewinds- they act like sails, pushing the wheel sideways. Thus the small heavy stuff goes up front, and the big, wind catching, light stuff goes in back.
fatbat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.