Retro
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Retro
As I am in a mood today, just what the hell does retro mean anyway? At what age does a bike go from a used bike to retro, then into vintage? Seems to me just another way to put lipstick on a pig.
Ok I feel better now.
Ok I feel better now.
#2
Papa Wheelie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Madison, Wi
Posts: 1,470
Bikes: Jamis Aurora '02; Takara Medalist (650B)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
in cars, a car that is 15 years old (my daughter has a 'classic' 1990 Geo Metro)
15 years prolly works for bikes, but 70-80's is better
15 years prolly works for bikes, but 70-80's is better
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
"Retro" is something from the past but generally is used in context of an older style/fashion or look applied to a contemporary subject. An old bike is not "retro" it is an old bike.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Leaving pigs and cosmetics out of this, retro depends on your point of reference.
A reasonable point for me is prior to the modern indexing era initiated by Shimano with SIS in the mid 80's.
Early Campagnolo C Record makes the cut for me, but only the pre Syncro stuff. For others it is before the death of Tullio.
For some, retro is Cambio Corsa, and the jockey wheel era is modern.
Another way to look at it is to not "buy-in" to the bike of the month club that the marketeers parade in front of you with the implication that to not have the latest will leave you dropped off the back.
A reasonable point for me is prior to the modern indexing era initiated by Shimano with SIS in the mid 80's.
Early Campagnolo C Record makes the cut for me, but only the pre Syncro stuff. For others it is before the death of Tullio.
For some, retro is Cambio Corsa, and the jockey wheel era is modern.
Another way to look at it is to not "buy-in" to the bike of the month club that the marketeers parade in front of you with the implication that to not have the latest will leave you dropped off the back.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
#6
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
By your definition, a new Brooks saddle would be "retro," as would the handlebar mounts for my water bottles, which use modern Minoura adaptors.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#7
Bottecchia fan
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
Um, I prefer classic or vintage to "old" but yes I agree with your sentiment. For example, a 2007 Mustang is "retro". A '69 Mustang is "classic". The basic idea of retro is to use older styling cues to evoke the sense of a once popular item. One of the more blatant attempts at bicycle retro-ism is the 2005-present Bianchi Pista. The Pista has been around for years but in 2005 they slapped the old school white panel decals on it to evoke memories of those 70's bike boom years. It failed in my estimation in large part because Bianchi never had white panel decals in the first place so it was purely an affectation.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SF
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Um, I prefer classic or vintage to "old" but yes I agree with your sentiment. For example, a 2007 Mustang is "retro". A '69 Mustang is "classic". The basic idea of retro is to use older styling cues to evoke the sense of a once popular item. One of the more blatant attempts at bicycle retro-ism is the 2005-present Bianchi Pista. The Pista has been around for years but in 2005 they slapped the old school white panel decals on it to evoke memories of those 70's bike boom years. It failed in my estimation in large part because Bianchi never had white panel decals in the first place so it was purely an affectation.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't really know what "retro" means. I don't think there's anything retro about wanting a certain kind of bike, or a bike that looks a certain way. Few of us can get a car built to our specifications. I mean, we are pretty much limited to what's at the dealerships, but many people can get a bike custom-built to their specs, and if doing so, why would we chose ugliness over beauty? It might not be up to current consumerist fashion trends, but it's not really retro.
#10
Ute å cyklar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sweden BD
Posts: 108
Bikes: 1968 Monark 318; 1984 Chesini X Uno; 1986 Miyata 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Technically speaking, retro- is a prefix and not supposed to be used on its own. It means back or backwards. Retro as used on its own nowadays, is short for retrospective which means looking back. So I guess a retro bike would be a bike made to resemble a bike model from earlier years, while a vintage bike actually is from earlier years.
Last edited by Henke; 09-22-07 at 01:33 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,485
Bikes: Casati, ,Peugot,Mitchell,Raliegh,Nishiki
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Technically speaking, retro- is a prefix and not supposed to be used on its own. It means back or backwards. Retro as used on its own nowadays, is short for retrospective which means looking back. So I guess a retro bike would be a bike made to resemble a bike model from earlier years, while a vintage bike actually is from earlier years.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 286
Bikes: Bridgestone Mile 112 (fixie); Early 70's Bottechia; 74 Schwinn Continental; Mercier Draco AL; Corratec Freeride MTB; Custom GT Azkar SS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts