Rebuilding a wheel on my commuter - Straight Gauge or Double Butted?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 253
Bikes: 2006 Novara Randonee, 2009 Fuji Cross Pro, 2013 Specialized Roubaix Pro, 2013 Allez Smartweld A5 Frankenbike, 2021 Diverge Comp Carbon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
2 Posts
Rebuilding a wheel on my commuter - Straight Gauge or Double Butted?
So in about a year and 1300 miles I've broken 2 rear drive side spokes on my Novara Randonee commuting to work. It's a Tiagra hub laced with 36 straight gauge spokes to a Mavic A319 hoop. I figure I should rebuild it, as I'm out of spare spokes now, and perhaps 2 broken spokes so soon points to a less-than-stellar build.
So I've got a stand, and am ordering a tensiometer. I'm looking to order the spokes, and find that my choices are straight 14ga, or 14/15/14 double butted.
I've read lost of threads extolling the virtues of DB spokes, will they really be stronger in my application? (Touring bike, 220# rider, carrying about 15# in bags on the rear rack)
Thanks in advance
So I've got a stand, and am ordering a tensiometer. I'm looking to order the spokes, and find that my choices are straight 14ga, or 14/15/14 double butted.
I've read lost of threads extolling the virtues of DB spokes, will they really be stronger in my application? (Touring bike, 220# rider, carrying about 15# in bags on the rear rack)
Thanks in advance
__________________
-------------------------------
'06 Novara Randonee
'09 Fuji Cross Pro
'13 Specialized Roubaix Pro
'13 Specialized Allez Smartweld Frankenbike
'21 Diverge Comp Carbon
-------------------------------
'06 Novara Randonee
'09 Fuji Cross Pro
'13 Specialized Roubaix Pro
'13 Specialized Allez Smartweld Frankenbike
'21 Diverge Comp Carbon
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 703
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So if the smaller diameter middle section is more shock absorbent...would a straight 15 gauge spoke absorb even more shock...and be that much stronger?
#5
drink slinger
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I recall that somewhere on Sheldon's wheelbuilding page he said that butted spokes were stronger than straight guage, even though that seems counterintuitive.
EDIT:
I tracked it down.
Double-butted spokes do more than save weight. The thick ends make them as strong in the highly-stressed areas as straight-gauge spokes of the same thickness, but the thinner middle sections make the spokes effectively more elastic. This allows them to stretch (temporarily) more than thicker spokes.
As a result, when the wheel is subjected to sharp localized stresses, the most heavily stressed spokes can elongate enough to shift some of the stress to adjoining spokes. This is particularly desirable when the limiting factor is how much stress the rim can withstand without cracking around the spoke hole.
# Triple-butted spokes, such as the DT Alpine III, are the best choice when durability and reliability is the primary aim, as with tandems and bicycles for loaded touring. They share the advantages of single-butted and double-butted spokes. The DT Alpine III, for instance, is 2.34 mm (13 gauge) at the head, 1.8 mm (15 gauge) in the middle, and 2.0 mm (14 gauge) at the threaded end.
Single- and triple-butted spokes solve one of the great problems of wheel design: Since spokes use rolled, not cut threads, the outside diameter of the threads is larger than the base diameter of the spoke wire. Since the holes in the hub flanges must be large enough to fit the threads through, the holes, in turn are larger than the wire requires. This is undesirable, because a tight match between the spoke diameter at the elbow and the diameter of the flange hole is crucial to resisting fatigue-related breakage.
Since single- and triple-butted spokes are thicker at the head end than at the thread end, they may be used with hubs that have holes just large enough to pass the thick wire at the head end.
EDIT:
I tracked it down.
Double-butted spokes do more than save weight. The thick ends make them as strong in the highly-stressed areas as straight-gauge spokes of the same thickness, but the thinner middle sections make the spokes effectively more elastic. This allows them to stretch (temporarily) more than thicker spokes.
As a result, when the wheel is subjected to sharp localized stresses, the most heavily stressed spokes can elongate enough to shift some of the stress to adjoining spokes. This is particularly desirable when the limiting factor is how much stress the rim can withstand without cracking around the spoke hole.
# Triple-butted spokes, such as the DT Alpine III, are the best choice when durability and reliability is the primary aim, as with tandems and bicycles for loaded touring. They share the advantages of single-butted and double-butted spokes. The DT Alpine III, for instance, is 2.34 mm (13 gauge) at the head, 1.8 mm (15 gauge) in the middle, and 2.0 mm (14 gauge) at the threaded end.
Single- and triple-butted spokes solve one of the great problems of wheel design: Since spokes use rolled, not cut threads, the outside diameter of the threads is larger than the base diameter of the spoke wire. Since the holes in the hub flanges must be large enough to fit the threads through, the holes, in turn are larger than the wire requires. This is undesirable, because a tight match between the spoke diameter at the elbow and the diameter of the flange hole is crucial to resisting fatigue-related breakage.
Since single- and triple-butted spokes are thicker at the head end than at the thread end, they may be used with hubs that have holes just large enough to pass the thick wire at the head end.
__________________
Five is right out!
Five is right out!
Last edited by theopowers; 02-10-08 at 12:14 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 1,383
Bikes: Cinelli Supercoursa 69, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Mondonico Diamond Extra 05, Coors Light Greg Lemond (built by Scapin) 88, Scapin MTB, Stumpjumper 83, Specialized Stumpjumper M4, Lemond Poprad 2001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
So in about a year and 1300 miles I've broken 2 rear drive side spokes on my Novara Randonee commuting to work. It's a Tiagra hub laced with 36 straight gauge spokes to a Mavic A319 hoop. I figure I should rebuild it, as I'm out of spare spokes now, and perhaps 2 broken spokes so soon points to a less-than-stellar build.
So I've got a stand, and am ordering a tensiometer. I'm looking to order the spokes, and find that my choices are straight 14ga, or 14/15/14 double butted.
I've read lost of threads extolling the virtues of DB spokes, will they really be stronger in my application? (Touring bike, 220# rider, carrying about 15# in bags on the rear rack)
Thanks in advance
So I've got a stand, and am ordering a tensiometer. I'm looking to order the spokes, and find that my choices are straight 14ga, or 14/15/14 double butted.
I've read lost of threads extolling the virtues of DB spokes, will they really be stronger in my application? (Touring bike, 220# rider, carrying about 15# in bags on the rear rack)
Thanks in advance
Good luck.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
It sounds like you original wheel was way under tensioned. There is no way spokes of any type should fail in 1300 miles unless you are a dreadfully abusive rider.
As noted DB spokes are strong at the ends where the elbow and threads are the usual failure points and thinner and more elastic in the center where stresses are lower.
As noted DB spokes are strong at the ends where the elbow and threads are the usual failure points and thinner and more elastic in the center where stresses are lower.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: TORONTO , ONT , CA
Posts: 813
Bikes: '86 AMBROSI / C RECORD. PINARELLO MONTELLO / FRAME, FORK.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Better mechanical properties aside, DB spokes lift a wheel from 'Classy', to . . .
'Ultra Classy'.
Regards,
J T
'Ultra Classy'.
Regards,
J T
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 253
Bikes: 2006 Novara Randonee, 2009 Fuji Cross Pro, 2013 Specialized Roubaix Pro, 2013 Allez Smartweld A5 Frankenbike, 2021 Diverge Comp Carbon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
2 Posts
Wow - thanks for all the replies. It's great to hear experiences that are directly relevant. No - I don't think I'm hard on my stuff, I don't ride through unnecessary crap, and any bumps that we do hit (even rough pavement) I come off the saddle and try to lessen. In reply to the poster who asked - I do plan to reuse the rim and hub. I've never had any problems with either, and the rim hasn't needed trued - except after replacing a spoke:-( I guess one never knows how it'll look without any spokes until I delace it, which I won't do until the rest of the parts are inhand.
Sounds like it's pretty unanimous to try the DB spokes. I'll re-meausure this evening (now that I have a nifty park spoke gauge from REI) and place the order.
Thanks again
Sounds like it's pretty unanimous to try the DB spokes. I'll re-meausure this evening (now that I have a nifty park spoke gauge from REI) and place the order.
Thanks again
__________________
-------------------------------
'06 Novara Randonee
'09 Fuji Cross Pro
'13 Specialized Roubaix Pro
'13 Specialized Allez Smartweld Frankenbike
'21 Diverge Comp Carbon
-------------------------------
'06 Novara Randonee
'09 Fuji Cross Pro
'13 Specialized Roubaix Pro
'13 Specialized Allez Smartweld Frankenbike
'21 Diverge Comp Carbon
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If the tensiometer shows that the spoke tension of the wheel is too low, the simplest solution might be to replace only the broken spoke and gradually increase the tension of the wheel. That might be sufficient. If another spoke breaks after that, total replacement of spokes would be called for.
The main difficulty with butted spokes is spoke windup, where the midsection of the spoke starts twisting in response to the turning of the nipple. The higher the spoke tension, the more pronounced the windup. It's fairly easy to compensate by developing a feel for how much to over-rotate, then back off; it's usually up to an eighth of a turn. Proper lubrication of spoke threads and nipple seats is crucial. Either straight gauge or butted should be strong enough if properly tensioned.
The main difficulty with butted spokes is spoke windup, where the midsection of the spoke starts twisting in response to the turning of the nipple. The higher the spoke tension, the more pronounced the windup. It's fairly easy to compensate by developing a feel for how much to over-rotate, then back off; it's usually up to an eighth of a turn. Proper lubrication of spoke threads and nipple seats is crucial. Either straight gauge or butted should be strong enough if properly tensioned.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 622
Bikes: 2006 LeMond Croix de Fer, 2005 Kona Dew Deluxe
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
DB - I'm 200lbs, commute every day over crappy cracked asphalt and cobblestones. They cost a tick more, but if you're building from scratch - make it worth it.
Besides, DB spokes are almost the only bicycle part that is both lighter and stronger at the same time.
Besides, DB spokes are almost the only bicycle part that is both lighter and stronger at the same time.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Most often it's the non-driveside rear spokes that break because they are the lowest tensioned spokes due to the asymetric flanges necessary to make room for the cassette or freewheel. Adding tension to the non-driveside spokes means that you must also add tension to the driveside spokes to keep the rim centered (dished).
Al
Al