Dont Forget CSC Test
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Dont Forget CSC Test
Hopefully they come up clean for the sake of the sport but don't forget that CSC got hit with the drug test and the results aren't in yet
#3
Chasing the Peloton!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sunnyvale CA
Posts: 550
Bikes: K2 MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is true and I have a feeling they will. It would be a sad sad day to have them stripped of the title. They all road very well, so we will see...
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 1,321
Bikes: Cervelo S5 SRAM Red -
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have you done any research on the internal anti Doping program they are using? I hope you do realize how it works and how difficult it would be to get away with doping. also if you do the math and the VAM numbers they are not really that impressive. this tour was very slow when compared to those of the past 10 years.
#5
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have you done any research on the internal anti Doping program they are using? I hope you do realize how it works and how difficult it would be to get away with doping. also if you do the math and the VAM numbers they are not really that impressive. this tour was very slow when compared to those of the past 10 years.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: København
Posts: 465
Bikes: Kinesisbikes UK Racelight Tk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I think it is pretty clear that doping was less rampant this year, so UCI, ASO+RCS, WADA and all the teams better get together and start some effective all-year testing to keep it that way.
--
Regards
Last edited by interested; 07-26-08 at 06:43 PM. Reason: Spelling
#7
Stop It!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 202
Bikes: Ferrari, Euro sport, Wheeler.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have you done any research on the internal anti Doping program they are using? I hope you do realize how it works and how difficult it would be to get away with doping. also if you do the math and the VAM numbers they are not really that impressive. this tour was very slow when compared to those of the past 10 years.
#8
Professional Fuss-Budget
It also helped that WADA worked with Roche to put a detectable molecule into CERA, which made it rather easy to find anyone taking it....
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ChapelBorro NC
Posts: 4,126
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Descends Like Avalanche
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Somewhere between Funkytown and Margaritaville, PA
Posts: 5,769
Bikes: Lynskey R240, Sportive, and a Helix Sport disc model in the works; Eddy Merckx MX Leader; Specialized Rock Hopper Comp (1988!)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Unfortunately Riis didn't confess until he was pressured by the confessions of numerous former teammates.
__________________
The rider in my avatar is David Etxebarria, not me.
#11
Since Ever Since
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have you done any research on the internal anti Doping program they are using? I hope you do realize how it works and how difficult it would be to get away with doping. also if you do the math and the VAM numbers they are not really that impressive. this tour was very slow when compared to those of the past 10 years.
#12
Glorified Blender
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This Tour was not very slow compared to those of the past ten years. By my calculation, Sastre won with a speed just over 40km/h. That's faster than every year except for 2003 - 2006, and about the same as 1999. I could be wrong, though, so someone should make the calculation themselves and see what's to be found.
#13
Since Ever Since
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, not basically nothing. The Tour does not change radically from year to year, and I think a compiling of aggregate climbing kilometers, TT kilometers, etc. of each Tour in the last 18 years would look remarkably similar -- not identical, but similar enough that a comparison of average speed is justified. Technological progression must also be taken into account before one speaks of doping in this context.
#14
Chunky Programmer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Have you done any research on the internal anti Doping program they are using? I hope you do realize how it works and how difficult it would be to get away with doping. also if you do the math and the VAM numbers they are not really that impressive. this tour was very slow when compared to those of the past 10 years.
https://www.bikeforums.net/showpost.p...3&postcount=59
__________________
Burn the incline - V5
Burn the incline - V5
#15
winning magazine junkie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: spfld ill
Posts: 518
Bikes: top end gitanes and some funky ones too
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Have you done any research on the internal anti Doping program they are using? I hope you do realize how it works and how difficult it would be to get away with doping. also if you do the math and the VAM numbers they are not really that impressive. this tour was very slow when compared to those of the past 10 years.
hmmm just like the one astana does, and yet no invite for them.too bad tho , it would have been cool to watch the great powerful csc battle a team equally as strong or stronger.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,655
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have you done any research on the internal anti Doping program they are using? I hope you do realize how it works and how difficult it would be to get away with doping. also if you do the math and the VAM numbers they are not really that impressive. this tour was very slow when compared to those of the past 10 years.
This is faster that Lance's 1999 record of 25.026 mph and would be a new record if I have done my numbers correctly. Someone please check and try to verify my numbers. I have only used the times and distances of each stage posted on VeloNews so my distances may not be official. Also, Lance's 1999 record was from an internet site and may not be accurate. Other years may be faster as this site may not have been updated and is not official.
https://studenttravel.about.com/od/to...ournumbers.htm
Edit: After some searching I found some other information. 2008 is fifth fastest tour in history. Information on that website is out of date.
Last edited by Hezz; 07-29-08 at 07:34 PM.
#17
Chasing the Peloton!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sunnyvale CA
Posts: 550
Bikes: K2 MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well Sastra had an awesome run period. He didn't run a full season like Cadel, and basically set out to win the tour. That was his season goal. He came prepaird and did well. CSC I beleive uses ACE, or at least something similar on their team. I knkow columbia and Garmin use ACE, and Rock Racing uses another company founded by one of the origional doctors who founded ACE. If they are doing their jobs internally then it is pretty hard to beat. If the French testing group comes back with a different opinion then the independant group can show a history to either support or help prove the A and B test findings. I am sure CSC will be clean.
#18
No one carries the DogBoy
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: København
Posts: 465
Bikes: Kinesisbikes UK Racelight Tk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
--
Regards
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: København
Posts: 465
Bikes: Kinesisbikes UK Racelight Tk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
IMHO Riis confessed because he didn't want to live the rest of his life on a lie, why spend energy denying something that didn't mean that much to him anymore. Riis wasn't an ex-rider desperate to live on his past glories, but a team owner and a DS.
One some level he wasn't smart to confess since all everybody remembers are the "certified" admitted doper while totally ignorant about all the lying dopers in the teams, both riders, DS's, team owners or doctors.
On a more personale level he was smart to confess. Think about being Landis or Armstrong and still lie about how clean they where (actually the only clean riders in top 10), how everything is a french conspiracy against them, yada yada yada.
--
Regards
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lactate Threshold
Posts: 584
Bikes: Orbea
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stating personal observations about doping is dumb. The “just because he did well on a stage so he must have doped” proves nothing.
Riccò’s winning margin over all the major contenders at Bagnerres de Bigorre was 1 minute 17 seconds. By comparison Sastre’s margin of victory on L’Alpe d’Huez was more than 2 minutes over all the other GC contenders. If any of these result sticks out like a sore thumb it has to be this one. Prior to his victory on 23 July Sastre had won just 6 races in an 11 year career and the KOM classification in the 2000 Vuelta.
Saying anybody doped with out empirical evidence is a waste of time. It is like saying that Tiger Woods must dope because he wins a lot. Tom Brady must have doped because he broke the NFL passing touchdown record blah… blah…. blah. All the Ricco case really proves is that the lab system is broken.
Last edited by Cateye; 08-08-08 at 09:44 AM.
#22
Je pose, donc je suis.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Back. Here.
Posts: 2,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
Riis didn't confess because he cracked under peer pressure. Lots of riders under even more pressure have remained silent or still lie about using dope.
IMHO Riis confessed because he didn't want to live the rest of his life on a lie, why spend energy denying something that didn't mean that much to him anymore. Riis wasn't an ex-rider desperate to live on his past glories, but a team owner and a DS.
One some level he wasn't smart to confess since all everybody remembers are the "certified" admitted doper while totally ignorant about all the lying dopers in the teams, both riders, DS's, team owners or doctors.
On a more personale level he was smart to confess. Think about being Landis or Armstrong and still lie about how clean they where (actually the only clean riders in top 10), how everything is a french conspiracy against them, yada yada yada.
--
Regards
IMHO Riis confessed because he didn't want to live the rest of his life on a lie, why spend energy denying something that didn't mean that much to him anymore. Riis wasn't an ex-rider desperate to live on his past glories, but a team owner and a DS.
One some level he wasn't smart to confess since all everybody remembers are the "certified" admitted doper while totally ignorant about all the lying dopers in the teams, both riders, DS's, team owners or doctors.
On a more personale level he was smart to confess. Think about being Landis or Armstrong and still lie about how clean they where (actually the only clean riders in top 10), how everything is a french conspiracy against them, yada yada yada.
--
Regards
"I did it. I've moved on. Now you move on, too," was his message.
Mvh
#23
Recreational Commuter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,024
Bikes: One brand-less build-up, and a Connondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra Disc. A nicer bike than I need, but it was a good deal, so... ;-)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: silicon valley
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Of course CSC-SB riders got tested a lot and not surprisingly so did Evans, Kohl etc. The AFLD strategy with targeted testing of anybody that does well is also a much better strategy than the normal UCI strategy of just testing the winner and some random dude in the peleton.
I think it is pretty clear that doping was less rampant this year, so UCI, ASO+RCS, WADA and all the teams better get together and start some effective all-year testing to keep it that way.
--
Regards
I think it is pretty clear that doping was less rampant this year, so UCI, ASO+RCS, WADA and all the teams better get together and start some effective all-year testing to keep it that way.
--
Regards
ed rader
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 583
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Even if the GC riders were slower this year on the climbs and TTs, it's not going to make a dent into the average speed. The overall average speed is mostly determined by the route, the weather, and how fast the domestiques feel like riding on flat stages. Seeing as the pool of pro cyclists, like most pro sports, is always on the increase, it's fair to say that as the years go on the overall talent in the peloton, and thus the average speed, is going to increase. Doping or no doping.
What would be interesting is getting a comparison of times on climbs. l'Alpe d'Huez in particular. Sastre "beating everyone" by 2 minutes doesn't necessarily mean anything. The only rider who chased him the whole climb was Evans, so if you don't calculate how long it took to actually climb the mountain, all you're doing is comparing two riders performances, rather than all the GC riders.
What would be interesting is getting a comparison of times on climbs. l'Alpe d'Huez in particular. Sastre "beating everyone" by 2 minutes doesn't necessarily mean anything. The only rider who chased him the whole climb was Evans, so if you don't calculate how long it took to actually climb the mountain, all you're doing is comparing two riders performances, rather than all the GC riders.