Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

installing cotterless cranks

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

installing cotterless cranks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-08, 02:07 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 187
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
installing cotterless cranks

i recently removed my cranks using this park tool: https://www.parktool.com/products/det...6&item=CCP%2D2

i have the type of spindle with a threaded rod on the end where a nut sits to hold the cranks.


i dont really understand how i re-install the cranks back onto the spindle. how do i press it back onto the tapered spindle?

im guessing i dont just push it on tight and do up the nut, as i had to use quite a bit of pressure to undo them with the removeing tool.




ive done some searches but i only ever find info on how to remove the cranks.

many thanks
melon is offline  
Old 12-21-08, 02:22 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 207
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You just place the arm back on and tighten the nut (or more commonly a bolt) to set the press fit. It is best to use a torque wrench for this so you get it right, although lots of people just do it by feel.

Park tools has some torque recommendations on their site:

https://www.parktool.com/repair/readhowto.asp?id=88
sfclearwater is offline  
Old 12-21-08, 09:25 PM
  #3  
rebmeM roineS
 
JanMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times in 226 Posts
Yep, that's right, you "....just push it on tight and do up the nut." Pretty much the same drill for axles with nuts or with bolts. Agree a torque wrench is ideal. Or, just a socket wrench if you don't put way too much juice to it.
JanMM is offline  
Old 12-22-08, 07:20 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 91 Posts
Make sure the spindle and mating surface of the crank arm are perfectly clean and greased. Then use a torque wrench at around 20 lbs-ft. The less torque you use the better as every time you take it off and put it on, it stretches the soft aluminum of the crank arm, which makes the crank arm fit closer and closer to the BB, changing the chainline, among other ills.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Old 12-22-08, 09:25 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
Make sure the spindle and mating surface of the crank arm are perfectly clean and greased.
Agree so far.

Originally Posted by San Rensho
Then use a torque wrench at around 20 lbs-ft. The less torque you use the better as every time you take it off and put it on, it stretches the soft aluminum of the crank arm, which makes the crank arm fit closer and closer to the BB, changing the chainline, among other ills.
Here I have to disagree. Too little installation torque will guarantee the arm comes loose and the crank will be ruined. Torque the nuts or bolts to the manufacturers full recommended value and do it ONCE. I.e. don't go back and retorque them every few rides.

I've remove and reinstalled the same square taper crank a dozen times and the chainline never changes if done properly. What does stretch aluminum arms is retorquing at frequent intervals after the initial installation.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-22-08, 12:12 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
Make sure the spindle and mating surface of the crank arm are perfectly clean and greased.

I'm waiting for the inevitable onslaught of contrasting opinions...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Old 12-22-08, 10:21 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
krems81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 795

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Many people believe there should be no grease on spindle, it makes the taper of the cranks slide on too easily and deform under torque. I'd be interested to hear contrasting opinions on this.

Anyhow, with or without grease (if you use it, just a tiny bit), just slide the crank onto the taper, and tighten down pretty hard. You don't want to whale away and use all your stength, but you want to put a good 100 pounds of torque on it, if not more. There's the vague possibility of overtightening, but its way better than undertightening and having your crank arms come loose and start jiggling around, and being deformed beyond use.
krems81 is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 02:09 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
Posts: 226

Bikes: commuter, racer, ATB,

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rmfnla
I'm waiting for the inevitable onslaught of contrasting opinions...
Right. Let's start a flame war close to Xmas

I have mounted many crancks with and without grease. Both ways, they stayed on and ran fine. I always take great care about cleaning the square holes with an old tooth brush prior to mounting them.

When it comes to removing the cranks again, I found it easier to take them off when they had been greased. I noticed less corrosion marks on the spindle and in the square hole. The grease keeps water out. I guess, mounting paste would do the same.
Berre is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 10:39 AM
  #9  
rebmeM roineS
 
JanMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times in 226 Posts
No grease on the tapers.....................Merry Christmas!
JanMM is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 11:14 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,514 Times in 2,857 Posts
Originally Posted by krems81
You don't want to whale away and use all your stength, but you want to put a good 100 pounds of torque on it, if not more.
Call me crazy, but how about following the MANUFACTURER'S instructions?
I have the Shimano instructions for an XT crank in front of me: 305-435 inch-pounds, that is 25-36 foot-pounds.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 11:32 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by krems81
Many people believe there should be no grease on spindle, it makes the taper of the cranks slide on too easily and deform under torque. I'd be interested to hear contrasting opinions on this.

Anyhow, with or without grease (if you use it, just a tiny bit), just slide the crank onto the taper, and tighten down pretty hard. You don't want to whale away and use all your stength, but you want to put a good 100 pounds of torque on it, if not more. There's the vague possibility of overtightening, but its way better than undertightening and having your crank arms come loose and start jiggling around, and being deformed beyond use.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 01:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by krems81
Many people believe there should be no grease on spindle, it makes the taper of the cranks slide on too easily and deform under torque. I'd be interested to hear contrasting opinions on this.

Anyhow, with or without grease (if you use it, just a tiny bit), just slide the crank onto the taper, and tighten down pretty hard. You don't want to whale away and use all your stength, but you want to put a good 100 pounds of torque on it, if not more. There's the vague possibility of overtightening, but its way better than undertightening and having your crank arms come loose and start jiggling around, and being deformed beyond use.
Where are you getting your 100-lb*ft torque numbers? You certainly haven't done it yourself or you'll find that the bolt will snap at about 50-60 lb*ft.

For the OP, yes, 25-36 lb*ft torque is A LOT. That's why it was so difficult to remove with the puller tool. Slipping a 12" pipe over the handle of the extractor makes it MUCH much easier to pull a crank. You'll want to make sure you re-install it to that torque-spec or else you'll run the risk of having the bolt coming loose and the crankarm will bugger itself on the hard steel spindle. Just do a search on here for "loose crankarm" and see how common this problem is.

You'll need an automotive-style torque-wrench with at least 10" handle to generate the required torque. Itty-bitty L-shaped allen-keys or the short 14/15mm Park Tool won't do it.

BTW, the cylinder-head bolts on my car require 80 lb*ft of torque.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 01:18 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
BTW, the cylinder-head bolts on my car require 80 lb*ft of torque.
The highest torque value I ever had to deal with was in graduate school the mid-'60's when I was using a 10,000 psi autoclave for high pressure hydrogenation reactions. There were 10 1" Grade 8 bolts holding the lid on and they had to be cross-pattern tightened, in stages, to 275 pounds-ft. I had a 3/4" square drive clicker-type torque wrench about 3' long and had to put one foot on the walls to get to the required torque. Those things were TIGHT!
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 03:01 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
Call me crazy, but how about following the MANUFACTURER'S instructions?
I have the Shimano instructions for an XT crank in front of me: 305-435 inch-pounds, that is 25-36 foot-pounds.
Crazy? How about delusional!?
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 03:03 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
The highest torque value I ever had to deal with was in graduate school the mid-'60's when I was using a 10,000 psi autoclave for high pressure hydrogenation reactions. There were 10 1" Grade 8 bolts holding the lid on and they had to be cross-pattern tightened, in stages, to 275 pounds-ft. I had a 3/4" square drive clicker-type torque wrench about 3' long and had to put one foot on the walls to get to the required torque. Those things were TIGHT!
I think I'm going to allow you to reply to all the "stuck seatpost" threads; you obviously have the experience!
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 06:22 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Never grease a square taper. You could easily split the crank arm.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 06:39 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by DieselDan
Never grease a square taper. You could easily split the crank arm.
No you can't. If you follow the manufacturer's recommended torque, or even come close, the crank arm's square hole won't distort or break.

I do grease the spindle on square taper bb's, torque the cranks as recommended and have never damaged one in 25 years of working on them. In fact, many of these cranks have been removed and reinstalled numerous times and always remain tight but the chainlines do not vary at all after a removal/replacement cycle.

I know Campy firmly recommends the spindles remain dry but they have never given an explanation as to why. I've discussed this with several mechanical engineers and they have no idea why either but think Campy's recommendation is a bad idea. They tell me greased tapered fits are far more uniform.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 06:59 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by DieselDan
Never grease a square taper. You could easily split the crank arm.
That's a new one to me.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Old 12-23-08, 07:45 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 187

Bikes: '83 Miyata Two-Ten, '84 Raleigh Pestige, '09 Downtube 8H

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've heard both ways recommended, greased or ungreased. I've also read that some manufacturers design with greasing in mind, but most design with dry in mind. But I don't remember which manufacturers want which. I found it pretty easily via a google search last time I put cranks on (which was just a couple of weeks ago). I lightly greased mine, then wiped it off.

One thing you should definitely do is lightly grease the threads, either of the spindle or the crank bolt, depending on what type of spindle you have. You should also rub just a bit of grease on the side of the nut that pushes against the crank, or the underside of the bolt head where it pushes against the crank.

And finally, if you're going to use a torque wrench anywhere on a bike, this is the place to use it. Most threaded fasteners need to be torqued correctly just to make sure they stay in place. But that crank bolt/nut needs to be torqued correctly to make sure the crank is pushed onto the spindle far enough to have a good mechanical connection, but not so far as to damage the crank. Sliding an aluminum crank onto a tapered steel spindle makes a lot of pressure, and it is very possible to split the crank arm if you overdo it. But if you underdo it, you'll end up with a loose crank halfway through your next long ride, probably 20 miles from home or the nearest bike shop, leaving you with three options: walk home, ride home using just one leg, or ride home destroying the loose crank in the process.

(Hmmm, my spell checker thinks "overdo" is OK, but objects to "underdo"... It also seems to dislike Scooby Doo)
khearn is offline  
Old 12-24-08, 12:32 AM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I always find it curious when talk turns to torque wrenches in the bike shop...we're fixing bicycles here, not space-shuttles.

An experienced mechanic will know that bolts either need to be tight, or really tight. Crank bolts should be really tight. Caution should be used if you have forearms like Popeye, otherwise, have at 'er.

The anti-corrosive properties of the grease is most beneficial to the steel axle.
Silent Otto is offline  
Old 12-24-08, 08:00 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by rmfnla
I'm waiting for the inevitable onslaught of contrasting opinions...
Well, it's here! Your wish is our command.

An experienced mechanic will know that bolts either need to be tight, or really tight.
Correct, but the key word here is "experienced". Mechanics who work on bikes every day can develop a good feel for the correct torque without a torque wrench. Those of us who work only part of the time or newbies, need quantified measurement. The alternative is a learning curve that includes a bunch of excessively loose parts and/or broken bolts.

Sheldon Brown had the same disdain for torque wrenches but he had something like 40 years of daily experience. Most of us don't.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-24-08, 01:07 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Not so much a wish as an expectation.

Happy holidays, HR; I always enjoy reading your contributions!
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Old 12-24-08, 01:08 PM
  #23  
Glad to be 'bent
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK
Posts: 32

Bikes: Radius C4 LWB USS & TW Actionbents trike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am entering into the grease/no grease debate, but the bit about the chainline altering is bunkum. Consider how much the chainline changes when you shift from the smallest ring to the largest on a trple set-up, and that doesn't cause problems. Therefore the couple of thousandths of an inch that may happen when you re-install a crank isn't going to matter one jot.
xpc316e is offline  
Old 12-24-08, 03:20 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 91 Posts
Originally Posted by xpc316e
I am entering into the grease/no grease debate, but the bit about the chainline altering is bunkum. Consider how much the chainline changes when you shift from the smallest ring to the largest on a trple set-up, and that doesn't cause problems. Therefore the couple of thousandths of an inch that may happen when you re-install a crank isn't going to matter one jot.
Well it does matter when the crank arm goes all the way in, the bolt bottoms against the spindle, not the crank arm and the small chain ring now interferes with the frame. All this can happen if you overtighten the crank bolt. Ask me how I know.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Old 12-24-08, 03:56 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
tmh657's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,694

Bikes: A few BSO's.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 27 Posts
ummmmmm, how? I find that annoying
tmh657 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.