1999: 21 lbs. 2005: 14 lbs.
#1
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
1999: 21 lbs. 2005: 14 lbs.
That's how much Lance says his Treks weighed in 1999 and then in 2005 (I'm sure he meant 14.9 lbs or whatever the UCI limit is) in the recent Outside Magazine interview (fascinating read by the way). Bicycle technology really did ramp up between '99 and '05. Interestingly enough, those are the years I was out of cycling completely (2000 through early 2005 actually) and when I returned to rides with the Road Nazis, the Nyack Ride seemed to have gotten faster. Everybody was riding bikes that were 3-5 lbs lighter with light Zipp style CF wheels.
Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
#2
Senior Member
I have to think with today's economy that a lot of the advancements we have seen in recreational technology is going to hit the proverbial brick wall for a few years.
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
#3
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I think we're coming up to materials limitations. Unless there is some relaxation in UCI regulations, we're almost all the way there.
#4
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
#5
Senior Member
#6
Senior Member
I was just looking at Jan Heine's new book, "The Competition Bicycle," over the weekend. He tracked down and photographed all the unrestored, famous racing bikes he could get his hands on -- the newest ones were bikes ridden by the likes of Merckx, Andy Hampsten, Greg Lemond.
Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.
The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.
https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.
The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.
https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
#7
I don't even own a cat...
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 424
Bikes: 2008 LG sonix 6.4, 2002 KHS Flite 500, 1999 Big Sur Gary Fisher
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was just looking at Jan Heine's new book, "The Competition Bicycle," over the weekend. He tracked down and photographed all the unrestored, famous racing bikes he could get his hands on -- the newest ones were bikes ridden by the likes of Merckx, Andy Hampsten, Greg Lemond.
Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.
The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.
https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.
The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.
https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
#8
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,457
Bikes: Isaac Impulse, Litespeed Solano, Mongoose Bosberg, Trek 5500, (recently sold Litespeed Classic, Scott Speedster Flat bar)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Although I agree that lighter bikes may offer some increased speed advantages, if you look at average TDF speeds, you will be surprised how some of those "heavier" bike years had some comparable average speeds over the duration of the whole Tour. Lemond still has the fastest TT I think.
That's how much Lance says his Treks weighed in 1999 and then in 2005 (I'm sure he meant 14.9 lbs or whatever the UCI limit is) in the recent Outside Magazine interview (fascinating read by the way). Bicycle technology really did ramp up between '99 and '05. Interestingly enough, those are the years I was out of cycling completely (2000 through early 2005 actually) and when I returned to rides with the Road Nazis, the Nyack Ride seemed to have gotten faster. Everybody was riding bikes that were 3-5 lbs lighter with light Zipp style CF wheels.
Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
#9
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
I was just looking at Jan Heine's new book, "The Competition Bicycle," over the weekend. He tracked down and photographed all the unrestored, famous racing bikes he could get his hands on -- the newest ones were bikes ridden by the likes of Merckx, Andy Hampsten, Greg Lemond.
Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.
The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.
https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.
The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.
https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
well at least now i know my 21lb ciocc is cutting edge, weight-wise (or, it was back in '99)
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
really? Not calling you a liar, but I doubt that his OCLV bike from that era weighed that much. Those were sub 3lb frames with a decently light group in that incarnation of dura ace. I might believe his TT rig weighed that much, but not his road stage bike.
If he was talking about his motorola rides I would believe it as one of the motorolites showed up to Cascade Cycling Classic one year and I picked up his bike and it was a tank. At least 23+ lbs.
If he was talking about his motorola rides I would believe it as one of the motorolites showed up to Cascade Cycling Classic one year and I picked up his bike and it was a tank. At least 23+ lbs.
#11
Making a kilometer blurry
Yeah, the record held up well, but DZ busted it.
#12
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
Gotta get that book. Fascinating.
#13
Senior Member
Although I agree that lighter bikes may offer some increased speed advantages, if you look at average TDF speeds, you will be surprised how some of those "heavier" bike years had some comparable average speeds over the duration of the whole Tour. Lemond still has the fastest TT I think.
In general, though, you're right. The average speed of modern Tours is higher, but a lot of that must be accounted for by shorter stages.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
I think Lance was exaggerating upwards a bit in saying his '99 bike weighed 21 lbs. I get his point, though.
My lugged steel '97 Pinarello, with 32 spoke wheels (Open Pros laced to Campy Centaur hubs), an '09 Campy Centaur group, Campy Chorus pedals, Cinelli stem/bars, Thomson seatpost and San Marco Concor Lite saddle weighs less than 21 lbs as you see it here:
My lugged steel '97 Pinarello, with 32 spoke wheels (Open Pros laced to Campy Centaur hubs), an '09 Campy Centaur group, Campy Chorus pedals, Cinelli stem/bars, Thomson seatpost and San Marco Concor Lite saddle weighs less than 21 lbs as you see it here:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 2,620
Bikes: Orbea Orca Trek 5500 Trek Equinox
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#16
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
I'd agree that Lance overstates the case a bit, but I'd be surprised if that '99 Trek weighed much under 19.5 -20lbs, and you can be sure his '05 bike was right @ the UCI 15lb weight limit.
#17
SLJ 6/8/65-5/2/07
I saw that LA quote a few days ago and was surprised his '99 bike was that heavy. It was very possible to set up a bike for a climbing stage that weighed less than that well prior to 1999.
No doubt that weight has taken a dramatic plunge though. When I first started getting interested back in the 70s the "gold standard" was 21-22lbs for a racer and it was hard to get much lighter (scary light and fragile tubulars and sew-ups). It seems nowadays the standard is about 17 and it's relatively easy, if expensive, to drop some pounds from there.
No doubt that weight has taken a dramatic plunge though. When I first started getting interested back in the 70s the "gold standard" was 21-22lbs for a racer and it was hard to get much lighter (scary light and fragile tubulars and sew-ups). It seems nowadays the standard is about 17 and it's relatively easy, if expensive, to drop some pounds from there.
__________________
“Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
Edna St. Vincent Millay
“Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
Edna St. Vincent Millay
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: flatlands
Posts: 603
Bikes: GT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
there was some nonsense during one of the tdf with lance, as trek had amdde him a climbing bike and presented it to be weighed. The team mechanics had it built under 6.8kg .
the race officials claimed it was fine to race and the ok weight, then the mechanics made them check a few times until it was declared underweight
"hey our bike is so light stock, it's illegal"
thing is they added weight to it, so it then could be race legal and the sclaes still showed it under weight.
dodgy scales and dodgy trek/lance marketing.
the race officials claimed it was fine to race and the ok weight, then the mechanics made them check a few times until it was declared underweight
"hey our bike is so light stock, it's illegal"
thing is they added weight to it, so it then could be race legal and the sclaes still showed it under weight.
dodgy scales and dodgy trek/lance marketing.
#19
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
Given recent advances in high zoot road bike technology, it's quite arguable the UCI weight limit needs to be updated and lowered to 6.4 kg (14.1 lbs) or so.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I remember someone posted a frame stiffness test that included and older OCLV and those things were flexy flyers.
#21
You gonna eat that?
#22
Senior Member
My race bike in 1989 weighed 18 lbs... very solid Klein frame, everything else a collection of fairly cheap random parts. So if Lance's bike weighed 21 lbs ten years later... I have to wonder why.
#23
Senior Member
Some examples of road racing bikes (time trial/track bikes not included) weighed for the book mentioned above:
Sean Kelly's 1991 Concorde: 22.8 lb
A. Hampsten's 1988 Huffy (actually a Landshark): 22 lb
Greg Lemond's 1981 Gitane: 22 lb.
E. Merckx's 1974 deRosa: 24.3 lb.
B. Waddell's 1965 Cinelli Supercorsa: 25.3 lb (this was a bike bought retail by a college student who was racing at the time)
1948 Wilier Tristina: 23.1 lb
1910 Labor Tour de France: 29.3 lb
#24
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
Pcad's 2007 Cannondale Six13: 16.2 lbs.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Was Lance's 21lb bike WITH water bottles and water?
That's how much Lance says his Treks weighed in 1999 and then in 2005 (I'm sure he meant 14.9 lbs or whatever the UCI limit is) in the recent Outside Magazine interview (fascinating read by the way). Bicycle technology really did ramp up between '99 and '05. Interestingly enough, those are the years I was out of cycling completely (2000 through early 2005 actually) and when I returned to rides with the Road Nazis, the Nyack Ride seemed to have gotten faster. Everybody was riding bikes that were 3-5 lbs lighter with light Zipp style CF wheels.
Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.