Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

1999: 21 lbs. 2005: 14 lbs.

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

1999: 21 lbs. 2005: 14 lbs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-09, 07:38 PM
  #1  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
1999: 21 lbs. 2005: 14 lbs.

That's how much Lance says his Treks weighed in 1999 and then in 2005 (I'm sure he meant 14.9 lbs or whatever the UCI limit is) in the recent Outside Magazine interview (fascinating read by the way). Bicycle technology really did ramp up between '99 and '05. Interestingly enough, those are the years I was out of cycling completely (2000 through early 2005 actually) and when I returned to rides with the Road Nazis, the Nyack Ride seemed to have gotten faster. Everybody was riding bikes that were 3-5 lbs lighter with light Zipp style CF wheels.

Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
patentcad is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:42 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
garysol1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 10,244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad

Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
I have to think with today's economy that a lot of the advancements we have seen in recreational technology is going to hit the proverbial brick wall for a few years.
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
garysol1 is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:43 PM
  #3  
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
pdedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I think we're coming up to materials limitations. Unless there is some relaxation in UCI regulations, we're almost all the way there.
pdedes is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:44 PM
  #4  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by garysol1
I have to think with today's economy that a lot of the advancements we have seen in recreational technology is going to hit the proverbial brick wall for a few years.
Isn't the wall Asian CF?
patentcad is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:45 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
garysol1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 10,244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Isn't the wall Asian CF?
It's a light wall but a wall all the same.....
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
garysol1 is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:47 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 6,955

Bikes: 2009 Chris Boedeker custom; 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 2021 Bill Davidson custom gravel bike; 2022 Specialized Turbo Vado e-bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
I was just looking at Jan Heine's new book, "The Competition Bicycle," over the weekend. He tracked down and photographed all the unrestored, famous racing bikes he could get his hands on -- the newest ones were bikes ridden by the likes of Merckx, Andy Hampsten, Greg Lemond.

Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.

The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.

https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
BengeBoy is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:56 PM
  #7  
I don't even own a cat...
 
invwnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 424

Bikes: 2008 LG sonix 6.4, 2002 KHS Flite 500, 1999 Big Sur Gary Fisher

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BengeBoy
I was just looking at Jan Heine's new book, "The Competition Bicycle," over the weekend. He tracked down and photographed all the unrestored, famous racing bikes he could get his hands on -- the newest ones were bikes ridden by the likes of Merckx, Andy Hampsten, Greg Lemond.

Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.

The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.

https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
good info
invwnut is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:57 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,457

Bikes: Isaac Impulse, Litespeed Solano, Mongoose Bosberg, Trek 5500, (recently sold Litespeed Classic, Scott Speedster Flat bar)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Although I agree that lighter bikes may offer some increased speed advantages, if you look at average TDF speeds, you will be surprised how some of those "heavier" bike years had some comparable average speeds over the duration of the whole Tour. Lemond still has the fastest TT I think.

Originally Posted by patentcad
That's how much Lance says his Treks weighed in 1999 and then in 2005 (I'm sure he meant 14.9 lbs or whatever the UCI limit is) in the recent Outside Magazine interview (fascinating read by the way). Bicycle technology really did ramp up between '99 and '05. Interestingly enough, those are the years I was out of cycling completely (2000 through early 2005 actually) and when I returned to rides with the Road Nazis, the Nyack Ride seemed to have gotten faster. Everybody was riding bikes that were 3-5 lbs lighter with light Zipp style CF wheels.

Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
Lazyrider is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 07:59 PM
  #9  
**** that
 
mattm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by BengeBoy
I was just looking at Jan Heine's new book, "The Competition Bicycle," over the weekend. He tracked down and photographed all the unrestored, famous racing bikes he could get his hands on -- the newest ones were bikes ridden by the likes of Merckx, Andy Hampsten, Greg Lemond.

Actual weights as photographed (with seats, pedals, etc.) were all about 22 to 24 pounds; not much change vs. some of the Tour de France winners in the book from the 40's and 50's. So while components improved a lot, weights didn't go down for many years.

The only bikes that weighed under 20 pounds were purpose-built time trial bikes with drilled out components, etc.

https://www.vintagebicyclepress.com/CompetitionBook.html
i wanna get that book, i love some of those old rigs. in another of his books he detailed an aluminum 10kg racer from the 50's.. i so want it!!

well at least now i know my 21lb ciocc is cutting edge, weight-wise (or, it was back in '99)
__________________
cat 1.

my race videos
mattm is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:04 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152

Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
really? Not calling you a liar, but I doubt that his OCLV bike from that era weighed that much. Those were sub 3lb frames with a decently light group in that incarnation of dura ace. I might believe his TT rig weighed that much, but not his road stage bike.

If he was talking about his motorola rides I would believe it as one of the motorolites showed up to Cascade Cycling Classic one year and I picked up his bike and it was a tank. At least 23+ lbs.
jonestr is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:13 PM
  #11  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Lazyrider
Lemond still has the fastest TT I think.
Yeah, the record held up well, but DZ busted it.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:17 PM
  #12  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Gotta get that book. Fascinating.
patentcad is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:35 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Lazyrider
Although I agree that lighter bikes may offer some increased speed advantages, if you look at average TDF speeds, you will be surprised how some of those "heavier" bike years had some comparable average speeds over the duration of the whole Tour. Lemond still has the fastest TT I think.
Zabriskie now, actually, over about the same distance.

In general, though, you're right. The average speed of modern Tours is higher, but a lot of that must be accounted for by shorter stages.
grolby is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:35 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
I think Lance was exaggerating upwards a bit in saying his '99 bike weighed 21 lbs. I get his point, though.

My lugged steel '97 Pinarello, with 32 spoke wheels (Open Pros laced to Campy Centaur hubs), an '09 Campy Centaur group, Campy Chorus pedals, Cinelli stem/bars, Thomson seatpost and San Marco Concor Lite saddle weighs less than 21 lbs as you see it here:

well biked is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:36 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Nate552's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 2,620

Bikes: Orbea Orca Trek 5500 Trek Equinox

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
That's how much Lance says his Treks weighed in 1999
I have this frame built up as my spare / commuter bike (well, the 1998 frame, same thing). Still rides great BTW.
Nate552 is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:38 PM
  #16  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
I'd agree that Lance overstates the case a bit, but I'd be surprised if that '99 Trek weighed much under 19.5 -20lbs, and you can be sure his '05 bike was right @ the UCI 15lb weight limit.
patentcad is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:44 PM
  #17  
SLJ 6/8/65-5/2/07
 
Walter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SE Florida, USA aka the Treasure Coast
Posts: 5,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 7 Posts
I saw that LA quote a few days ago and was surprised his '99 bike was that heavy. It was very possible to set up a bike for a climbing stage that weighed less than that well prior to 1999.

No doubt that weight has taken a dramatic plunge though. When I first started getting interested back in the 70s the "gold standard" was 21-22lbs for a racer and it was hard to get much lighter (scary light and fragile tubulars and sew-ups). It seems nowadays the standard is about 17 and it's relatively easy, if expensive, to drop some pounds from there.

__________________
“Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
Edna St. Vincent Millay
Walter is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 08:45 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: flatlands
Posts: 603

Bikes: GT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
there was some nonsense during one of the tdf with lance, as trek had amdde him a climbing bike and presented it to be weighed. The team mechanics had it built under 6.8kg .

the race officials claimed it was fine to race and the ok weight, then the mechanics made them check a few times until it was declared underweight

"hey our bike is so light stock, it's illegal"

thing is they added weight to it, so it then could be race legal and the sclaes still showed it under weight.

dodgy scales and dodgy trek/lance marketing.
woodduck is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 09:04 PM
  #19  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Given recent advances in high zoot road bike technology, it's quite arguable the UCI weight limit needs to be updated and lowered to 6.4 kg (14.1 lbs) or so.
patentcad is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 09:22 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152

Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
I'd agree that Lance overstates the case a bit, but I'd be surprised if that '99 Trek weighed much under 19.5 -20lbs, and you can be sure his '05 bike was right @ the UCI 15lb weight limit.
I had some friends who were riding OCLVs of the same vintage and they were all less than 18lbs with Dura Ace and 32hole wheels.

I remember someone posted a frame stiffness test that included and older OCLV and those things were flexy flyers.
jonestr is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 09:40 PM
  #21  
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,715

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
WOW. Another Lance thread. How awesome.

__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 09:55 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ruidoso, NM
Posts: 1,359
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by patentcad
Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
My race bike in 1989 weighed 18 lbs... very solid Klein frame, everything else a collection of fairly cheap random parts. So if Lance's bike weighed 21 lbs ten years later... I have to wonder why.
rruff is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 10:00 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 6,955

Bikes: 2009 Chris Boedeker custom; 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 2021 Bill Davidson custom gravel bike; 2022 Specialized Turbo Vado e-bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Gotta get that book. Fascinating.

Some examples of road racing bikes (time trial/track bikes not included) weighed for the book mentioned above:

Sean Kelly's 1991 Concorde: 22.8 lb
A. Hampsten's 1988 Huffy (actually a Landshark): 22 lb
Greg Lemond's 1981 Gitane: 22 lb.
E. Merckx's 1974 deRosa: 24.3 lb.
B. Waddell's 1965 Cinelli Supercorsa: 25.3 lb (this was a bike bought retail by a college student who was racing at the time)
1948 Wilier Tristina: 23.1 lb
1910 Labor Tour de France: 29.3 lb
BengeBoy is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 10:02 PM
  #24  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Pcad's 2007 Cannondale Six13: 16.2 lbs.

patentcad is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 10:21 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Was Lance's 21lb bike WITH water bottles and water?


Originally Posted by patentcad
That's how much Lance says his Treks weighed in 1999 and then in 2005 (I'm sure he meant 14.9 lbs or whatever the UCI limit is) in the recent Outside Magazine interview (fascinating read by the way). Bicycle technology really did ramp up between '99 and '05. Interestingly enough, those are the years I was out of cycling completely (2000 through early 2005 actually) and when I returned to rides with the Road Nazis, the Nyack Ride seemed to have gotten faster. Everybody was riding bikes that were 3-5 lbs lighter with light Zipp style CF wheels.

Kind of makes you wonder if they can make that kind of advancement in the art in the next five years, but they would appear to be pushing the envelope a bit.
Rutnick is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.