Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

shimano or SRAM chain

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

shimano or SRAM chain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-09 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
shimano or SRAM chain

Any significant differences for a person riding a road bike? I know the sram has a easy off link. the bike is a 9 speed ultegra/105.

thanks
bakhurts is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-09 | 08:04 PM
  #2  
DOS's Avatar
DOS
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 76
From: Arlington, VA USA
Powerlink is the main difference and reason enough to choose SRAM.
DOS is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-09 | 09:29 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 469
Likes: 1
From: Louisville, KY

Bikes: Trek Madone 5.5, Klein Q Pro Elite, Surley LHT

+1 on DOS.
kycycler is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-09 | 10:02 PM
  #4  
pwdeegan's Avatar
smitten by саша
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR

Bikes: Salsa La Cruz with Rohloff; mutt parts

masterlinks are easier to work with for both installing and removing, but i really like shimano chains and the pin for reliability---it more closely acts like an original rivet, and in my own applications significantly reduces instances of chain suck and other chain problems. to be sure, the pins are more of a hassle than the masterlinks, but i don't really have need to take my chain on and off very often (and if it requires a serious cleaning, i just pony up the pocket change for a new pin).
pwdeegan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-09 | 10:21 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, Wa

Bikes: 2007 Specialized Transition

Try Wipperman, their connex link is easier to assemble and reusable.
lakay is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-09 | 11:02 PM
  #6  
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Low car diet
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 4
From: Corvallis, OR, USA

Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.

I'm using a 10-speed Shimano chain and Wipperman Connex link on the road bike and a similar 9-speed setup on the MTB. My shop friend convinced me everything would work best using a Shimano chain with an otherwise full Shimano drivetrain, but I can't stand the replacement pin system.
JiveTurkey is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-09 | 12:27 AM
  #7  
2_i
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 399
From: Michigan

Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...

Originally Posted by lakay
Try Wipperman, their connex link is easier to assemble and reusable.
As a word of caution, the masterlinks deteriorate at least as quickly as any other links within a chain. By using them beyond the life of the original chain, you can speed up the deterioration of the chain within which you reuse them, and of the drivetrain.
2_i is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-09 | 12:57 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by lakay
Try Wipperman, their connex link is easier to assemble and reusable.
The SRAM 9 speed is reusable too. As for easier to assemble, the Connex chain makes a really annoying noise if you assemble the link upside down. SRAM doesn't have this problem.
Cyclist0383 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-09 | 01:20 AM
  #9  
sharkey00's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
I used to use Shimano now I use SRAM. The main reason for switching is I was having problems getting the Shimano pins in and out without bending the links. So I switched to SRAM and have not had any regrets. I like being able to take my chain off and they have been easy to work with.

In the end I think the Shimano might make for a stronger chain (if installed flawlessly) but SRAM is much more convenient. Also, SRAM makes it possible to use my new favorite lube.
sharkey00 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-09 | 08:53 AM
  #10  
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Low car diet
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 4
From: Corvallis, OR, USA

Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.

Originally Posted by 2_i
As a word of caution, the masterlinks deteriorate at least as quickly as any other links within a chain. By using them beyond the life of the original chain, you can speed up the deterioration of the chain within which you reuse them, and of the drivetrain.
This sounds like a good thing. Better to have all the links wear at the same rate. If the Connex did not wear, it could skip around.

Originally Posted by Ziemas
The SRAM 9 speed is reusable too. As for easier to assemble, the Connex chain makes a really annoying noise if you assemble the link upside down. SRAM doesn't have this problem.
Easy solution: Install it right-side-up. The Connex is shaped like a kidney bean. You know you have it installed correctly when the Connex's curvature matches the curvature of the chainrings and cogs.
JiveTurkey is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.