A quick question about pannier capacity.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A quick question about pannier capacity.
I've noticed that panniers are listed according to the volume they can hold in liters.
I know what a 2 liter soda bottle looks like. Am I right to assume that a 40L set of panniers can hold as much as I could stuff in 20 2L bottles? That seems like a lot of space.
I know what a 2 liter soda bottle looks like. Am I right to assume that a 40L set of panniers can hold as much as I could stuff in 20 2L bottles? That seems like a lot of space.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
The size is also frequently given in cubic inches and the 40 l pair holds about 2440 in^3. Not sure that either figure is all that useful in visualizing how many clothes, food, camping gear, cooking utensils, etc. will fit. I find it more useful to compare the capacity to some bag that I already have.
OTOH, note that you won't come close to getting the 20 2 l bottles to fit in the panniers since there'll be lots of wasted space. I was only able to fit a dozen of them on a recent shopping trip.
OTOH, note that you won't come close to getting the 20 2 l bottles to fit in the panniers since there'll be lots of wasted space. I was only able to fit a dozen of them on a recent shopping trip.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 238
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yes, 40 liters is 40 liters, regardless of what form it is in.gratned, wasted spaces will surely make packing harder, but like I said, X liters is X liters.
X can be cubic inches, liters, whatever, that does not chage a thing.
robi
X can be cubic inches, liters, whatever, that does not chage a thing.
robi
#4
pedaling furiously
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Niagara Region, Ontario
Posts: 110
Bikes: 08 Jamis Aurora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Think of it the other way: how many soda bottles could you dump into that pair of panniers? Sounds like a big number? It's 1.4 cubic feet or a bit less than an 18" cube.
Bear in mind that capacity doesn't come close to describing utility in terms of packing, finding, unpacking & repacking stuff. Two different containers, each 40L could be vastly different in layout, and thus utility.
pubb
Bear in mind that capacity doesn't come close to describing utility in terms of packing, finding, unpacking & repacking stuff. Two different containers, each 40L could be vastly different in layout, and thus utility.
pubb
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12192 Post(s)
Liked 1,496 Times
in
1,108 Posts
Basically panniers come in 3 sizes. Small, Med and large.
Small ones up front, medium is for commuting and lite touring, and the large suckers for camping/touring.
What do you plan on doing?
Small ones up front, medium is for commuting and lite touring, and the large suckers for camping/touring.
What do you plan on doing?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 772
Bikes: Trek 630 • Jamis Quest • Bilenky Tourlite and various others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most manufacturers give pannier dimensions. I built cardboard mock-ups to get a real idea of capacity before committing to an on line purchase. Keep in mind you can stuff a little more in the actual soft panniers. It is however, a way to get a relatively accurate idea. When my panniers arrived, they were the same size as the mock-ups.
#7
Senior Member
This whole thread is predicated on the false notion that there's such a thing as panniers that are too big. If they're not dragging on the ground, they're not too big.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NE Tx
Posts: 2,766
Bikes: Tour Easy, Linear USS, Lightening Thunderbolt, custom DF, Raleigh hybrid, Felt time trial
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have to agree with stevage. I've often wished I had more room, never wished for less. But less forces packing discipline. That is good.
#9
pedaling furiously
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Niagara Region, Ontario
Posts: 110
Bikes: 08 Jamis Aurora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Panniers may not be too big, but they can be more expensive than necessary...
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Another way to think of it is compared to a rucksack. A normal day rucksack that you use for school or day to day use is probably around 15-20 litres. A backpacking sack is around 60-70 litres. The usual layout of panniers would be 2x20 rear and 2x12.5 front giving 65 litres. Possibly plus a barbag, 7 litres. Many people strap something like a tent to the rear rack and carry water bottles on the frame giving another few litres.
One thing I found when packing for my first mini tour recently was that it was more difficult to fill all the space in four panniers compared to one big rucksack. The four seperate bags resulted in more wasted space. I think I will prabably get better with practise though.
One thing I found when packing for my first mini tour recently was that it was more difficult to fill all the space in four panniers compared to one big rucksack. The four seperate bags resulted in more wasted space. I think I will prabably get better with practise though.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 537
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pannier space is not a significant factor for me. I hit my weight limit before my panniers are full. More space would just encourage me to take more, and I don't need such encouragement.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I agree with some other comments that the exact capacity isn't usually that much of an issue. If everything fits ok then I'll pack the tent, sleeping bag, and Thermarest inside the panniers. But if there isn't enough room then one or more of those items can easily be moved to the top of the rack instead
#13
ah.... sure.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 4,107
Bikes: Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you took 20 2L soda bottles and poured them into your proposed panniers(water proof of course)they would fit. They are based on volume. Soda bottles are not square and do not fit perfect. The liquid would.
Does that make sense?
Does that make sense?