One Week Gone
#1
Thread Starter
Lance Hater

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
One Week Gone
Impressions of the first week?
1. This is the worst weather I've seen in a while.
2. Tour de Crash indeed.
3. I liked the inclusion of the pave.
4. Too many flat stages? I'd like to see more uphill sprints.
1. This is the worst weather I've seen in a while.
2. Tour de Crash indeed.
3. I liked the inclusion of the pave.
4. Too many flat stages? I'd like to see more uphill sprints.
#2
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Piedmont, CA
Bikes: '04 LeMond Buenos Aires
The uphill sprint finish today certainly helped "thin out" the peloton.
They need more of that on the flat stages, or need to keep the finish barricades wider, to help reduce the crash potential.
They need more of that on the flat stages, or need to keep the finish barricades wider, to help reduce the crash potential.
#5
Photog Extraordinaire

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Bikes: Santa Cruz Chameleon, Cannondale R800 (CAAD4) with Dura-Ace upgrade
I think that the Tour is not going to win too many new viewers to the sport this year. I imagine that those potential viewers who don't understand the nuances of the sport will have tuned out by now. Anything to generate more interest or movement in the GC during this time period would help the casual viewer who can't appreciate the assault on the points jersey.
I disagree on the inclusion of the Pave. We saw what happened to Mayo, what if Armstrong, Ullrich or Hamilton had flatted in that first section and lost valuable time? I don't think we really want to see the GC decided by the random act of snake bitten tubes do we? Then again with the strength of their teams they may not have lost any time at all, but they certainly would have expended valuable energy. It's tough. The cobbles are part of the classic history of cycling, but do they have a legitimate role in a 3 week stage race?
I disagree on the inclusion of the Pave. We saw what happened to Mayo, what if Armstrong, Ullrich or Hamilton had flatted in that first section and lost valuable time? I don't think we really want to see the GC decided by the random act of snake bitten tubes do we? Then again with the strength of their teams they may not have lost any time at all, but they certainly would have expended valuable energy. It's tough. The cobbles are part of the classic history of cycling, but do they have a legitimate role in a 3 week stage race?
#6
Thread Starter
Lance Hater

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Crack'n'fail
I think that the Tour is not going to win too many new viewers to the sport this year. I imagine that those potential viewers who don't understand the nuances of the sport will have tuned out by now.
#7
Senior Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: in Payne, NC
Bikes: Mongrel
Armstrong made sense when he complained about the lack of a TT earlier, to define the favorites better. It just seems like a bunch of one-day races so far.
And I don't think I want to ride in it, anymore. Too dangerous
And I don't think I want to ride in it, anymore. Too dangerous
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne Oz
Bikes: how long have you got?
g'day,
Agree with most of the previous posts......it's been a bit 'ho hum' hasn't it?...we've learnt nothing about the 'main contenders', they are all still playing their cards close to their chest...just as well theres been afew bingles to lighten things up!......that & Thor
(us KG486 riders gotta stick together!),
cheers,
Hitchy
Agree with most of the previous posts......it's been a bit 'ho hum' hasn't it?...we've learnt nothing about the 'main contenders', they are all still playing their cards close to their chest...just as well theres been afew bingles to lighten things up!......that & Thor
(us KG486 riders gotta stick together!),
cheers,
Hitchy





