Pista vs. Keirin
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pista vs. Keirin
is it true that the 80's Pinarellos, and italian bikes are superior in construction, and are made of a better steel than the NJS frames? Is it an apples and oranges, or is there a clear winner in this competition? Are the Panasonics, and kazanes of today made with the same quality steel, or inferior?
#2
snob
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think there's a lot of myth about italian racing bicycles. I don't know a definite answer to that question, but if I had to guess, I'd bet that modern japanese bikes use superior steel and production techniques.
#3
Beausage is Beautiful
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Saitama, Japan
Posts: 5,504
Bikes: Nabiis Alchemy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
8 Posts
Maybe a better question is, "is there any chance any of this is going to make any difference to me in my experience as a rider?"
#4
made in italy
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: the world
Posts: 151
Bikes: Bianchi, bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
But Italian frames MADE IN ITALY and not outsourced to some Asian empire are better than ones that are. It's all about preserving heritage. See my signature.
When people are dropping $2000+ on an Italian name they consciously or subconsciously expect the frame to have been made in Italy by real Italians. Little do they realize 75% of these bicycles have the Italian name, the Italian pricetag, yet are mass produced in some Chinese factory for its cheap labor.
I personally don't support such companies with my money.
#5
Beausage is Beautiful
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Saitama, Japan
Posts: 5,504
Bikes: Nabiis Alchemy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
8 Posts
I smell xenophobia. My bike was hand built in Kyoto, Japan. I think it's a beautiful thing. It would not be what it is if it had been brazed in Italy.
#6
made in italy
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: the world
Posts: 151
Bikes: Bianchi, bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The moment your hand built bike starts moving operations into China, Singapore, even Italy --- is the moment when your bike manufacturer officially sucks in my book.
My point is: Italian bikes are to be made in Italy. Japanese bikes are to be made in Japan. Chinese bikes are to be made in China. American bikes are to be made in the USA. The moment a company outsources is how they immediately lose my respect and all my cash.
#8
Beausage is Beautiful
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Saitama, Japan
Posts: 5,504
Bikes: Nabiis Alchemy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
8 Posts
The blame for outsourcing lies with the consumer. None of the manufacturing would move if people were willing to put cash on the table for a quality product made locally. People want cheaper options, more immediate purchases, and easier choices, and ultimately what happens is that the manufacturing cannot be sustained domestically. It's not like these manufacturers *want* to outsource, but when the consumer demand shifts such that they cannot afford to stay in business and keep manufacturing where it originally was, it becomes largely inevitable.
#9
made in italy
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: the world
Posts: 151
Bikes: Bianchi, bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, I'm aware of that and it's a shame. That's why my future bike purchases will be with custom & local builders of that respective country. I'm willing to pay a lot more to have a bike that preserves heritage.
#10
snob
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I love my 600€ bike and I neither know nor care where it was produced. The thing is, welding some steel tubes together isn't rocket science. Chances are, that uneducated farmer's kid in the factory in Shanghai can do it just as well as the guy from Milan who had the craft handed down to him from his great-grandfather.
There's no art or love in such a bike, but it works just as well.
#11
Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
#13
Run What 'Ya Brung
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Will it make you a better rider? No.
But Italian frames MADE IN ITALY and not outsourced to some Asian empire are better than ones that are. It's all about preserving heritage. See my signature.
When people are dropping $2000+ on an Italian name they consciously or subconsciously expect the frame to have been made in Italy by real Italians. Little do they realize 75% of these bicycles have the Italian name, the Italian pricetag, yet are mass produced in some Chinese factory for its cheap labor.
I personally don't support such companies with my money.
But Italian frames MADE IN ITALY and not outsourced to some Asian empire are better than ones that are. It's all about preserving heritage. See my signature.
When people are dropping $2000+ on an Italian name they consciously or subconsciously expect the frame to have been made in Italy by real Italians. Little do they realize 75% of these bicycles have the Italian name, the Italian pricetag, yet are mass produced in some Chinese factory for its cheap labor.
I personally don't support such companies with my money.
#14
King of the Hipsters
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,128
Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
For the best steel bike, I would choose a Japanese-fabricated frameset made of Japanese Kaisei tubing.
Even modest modern steel tubing, such as Kaisei's 4130, has better quality and strength to weight ratios compared to the best of vintage tubing.
I think Kaisei's top end 8630 tubing represents 60% of the tubing used for Keirin frames.
If I had the time to wait and the money (and if they'd make me a threadless fork), I'd go with a steel frame set from a Keirin maker over anything else available.
Even modest modern steel tubing, such as Kaisei's 4130, has better quality and strength to weight ratios compared to the best of vintage tubing.
I think Kaisei's top end 8630 tubing represents 60% of the tubing used for Keirin frames.
If I had the time to wait and the money (and if they'd make me a threadless fork), I'd go with a steel frame set from a Keirin maker over anything else available.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: where the mild things roam
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#16
Gay Israel
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midtown Detroit
Posts: 77
Bikes: '83 Bianchi Nuovo Racing, '89 Bianchi Sport SX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the guy in my lbs says that columbus SL tubing, especially from the 80s is far far superior to anything being used today, including Reynolds 631. What he knows, I dont know. but he seems to know what hes saying. I tend to want to believe this, cause an 80s pinarello is what i ride
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 788
Bikes: Capo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It would be great to put a list together of all the companies and their bike models that are still made in the original country.
#19
a.k.a. QUADZILLA
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,505
Bikes: Super Pista, Basso, Big Dummy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the guy in my lbs says that columbus SL tubing, especially from the 80s is far far superior to anything being used today, including Reynolds 631. What he knows, I dont know. but he seems to know what hes saying. I tend to want to believe this, cause an 80s pinarello is what i ride
The only Japanese steel that matters is Hatori Hanzo.
#20
Fails at being impressed
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 378
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
With regards to the "superior in construction" part of the OP's question, that answer is easy: NJS.
NJS-certified frames have to be made to a near bulletproof standard to withstand the rigors of racing. Should more than one frame fail over the course of its professional life, then the builder's shop gets a stringent re-evaluation by the certifying board and potentially loses their ability to produce frames with the NJS stamp. Most recently, it happened to the Vivalo shop after two forks broke during a race.
Italian frames, on the other hand, even from good shops like DeRosa, are frequently inconsistent in their construction, both structurally and aesthetically. I've Cinellis, Colnagos, Pinarellos, etc that are perfectly made and some that are fine, save for an ugly file bite here or a small gap in the brazing there. It's not usually necessarily a bad thing but with most Italian frames, you just have to accept that it is not perfect.
It is still a pretty fair comparison, though, since NJS frames are willfully built with 'old-style' CrMo tubing and a good number of the Japanese framebuilders idolize/emulate/apprenticed with the old Italian masters.
NJS-certified frames have to be made to a near bulletproof standard to withstand the rigors of racing. Should more than one frame fail over the course of its professional life, then the builder's shop gets a stringent re-evaluation by the certifying board and potentially loses their ability to produce frames with the NJS stamp. Most recently, it happened to the Vivalo shop after two forks broke during a race.
Italian frames, on the other hand, even from good shops like DeRosa, are frequently inconsistent in their construction, both structurally and aesthetically. I've Cinellis, Colnagos, Pinarellos, etc that are perfectly made and some that are fine, save for an ugly file bite here or a small gap in the brazing there. It's not usually necessarily a bad thing but with most Italian frames, you just have to accept that it is not perfect.
It is still a pretty fair comparison, though, since NJS frames are willfully built with 'old-style' CrMo tubing and a good number of the Japanese framebuilders idolize/emulate/apprenticed with the old Italian masters.
Last edited by trelhak; 08-17-09 at 04:54 PM.
#22
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#23
King of the Hipsters
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,128
Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Steel production technology, and especially so in Japan and in some European and American low-volume mills, has improved dramatically and steadily over the years.
And I think Japan has a long tradition of producing the finest steel in the world.
From United Bicycle Institute's site:
"Kaisei tubing is a direct descendent of Ishiwata, a Japanese company that established a significant reputation in the market for high-end steel bicycle tubing in the 1970's and 1980's. When Ishiwata closed its doors in 1993, Kaisei became home to many of Ishiwata's most experienced employees and also took over its butted tube manufacturing process. Kaisei currently holds a 60 per cent share of Japan's elite Keirin frame building market."
4130 steel has existed in some form for probably over a hundred years, gaining initial use in the firearms industry because of its toughness and resiliance.
However, the process of producing, shaping and heat-treating steel, regardless of type or composition, has constantly improved.
Kaisei's bottom-of-the-line quad-butted 4130 tube set weighs 1970g, before cutting to dimension.
I can't find a weight for Kaisei's 8630 tube set, which corresponds to a Chrome-Moly-Nickel steel, and which, interestingly, the Germans also manufacture as an industrial knife steel, and which John Greco, an American knife-maker uses exclusively because of its toughness and resiliance.
As for Columbus sl, a quick google search found several sites that compared Columbus sl to Reynolds 531, a steel now considered obsolete for a variety of reasons.
From a highly respected technical site:
"Columbus is also a long-time maker of tubing. SL was very popular in the 80s and is similar in characteristics to Reynolds 531.
Reynolds has made their "531" tubing for nearly forever, literally dating back to the 1920s or 1930s. It's not actually chrome-moly tubing, but the material properties are similar."
https://sfcyclotouring.blogspot.com/2...ke-frames.html
"One of the most successful older steels was Reynolds "531", a manganese-molybdenum alloy steel...Reynolds 531 has now been largely replaced in new frames by still-better steels...More common now is 4130 ChroMoly or similar alloys."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_frame
New and better manufacturing methods have made 4130, an otherwise older steel, superior to 531.
Further, Columbus sl corresponds to Reynolds 531 and not to Reynolds 631.
Reynolds 631 represents a major improvement over 531 and the other tubing steels of the 531 era.
Tubing from the 1970's and 80's has no relevance in comparison to modern tubing except for its nostalgic or historical value.
In terms of metallurgy, I doubt if any of the Japanese tubes compare in terms of strength-to-weight ratios to True Temper's, Reynold's and Columbus's best offerings, but they do compare favorably in quality of manufacture.
And I think Japan has a long tradition of producing the finest steel in the world.
From United Bicycle Institute's site:
"Kaisei tubing is a direct descendent of Ishiwata, a Japanese company that established a significant reputation in the market for high-end steel bicycle tubing in the 1970's and 1980's. When Ishiwata closed its doors in 1993, Kaisei became home to many of Ishiwata's most experienced employees and also took over its butted tube manufacturing process. Kaisei currently holds a 60 per cent share of Japan's elite Keirin frame building market."
4130 steel has existed in some form for probably over a hundred years, gaining initial use in the firearms industry because of its toughness and resiliance.
However, the process of producing, shaping and heat-treating steel, regardless of type or composition, has constantly improved.
Kaisei's bottom-of-the-line quad-butted 4130 tube set weighs 1970g, before cutting to dimension.
I can't find a weight for Kaisei's 8630 tube set, which corresponds to a Chrome-Moly-Nickel steel, and which, interestingly, the Germans also manufacture as an industrial knife steel, and which John Greco, an American knife-maker uses exclusively because of its toughness and resiliance.
As for Columbus sl, a quick google search found several sites that compared Columbus sl to Reynolds 531, a steel now considered obsolete for a variety of reasons.
From a highly respected technical site:
"Columbus is also a long-time maker of tubing. SL was very popular in the 80s and is similar in characteristics to Reynolds 531.
Reynolds has made their "531" tubing for nearly forever, literally dating back to the 1920s or 1930s. It's not actually chrome-moly tubing, but the material properties are similar."
https://sfcyclotouring.blogspot.com/2...ke-frames.html
"One of the most successful older steels was Reynolds "531", a manganese-molybdenum alloy steel...Reynolds 531 has now been largely replaced in new frames by still-better steels...More common now is 4130 ChroMoly or similar alloys."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_frame
New and better manufacturing methods have made 4130, an otherwise older steel, superior to 531.
Further, Columbus sl corresponds to Reynolds 531 and not to Reynolds 631.
Reynolds 631 represents a major improvement over 531 and the other tubing steels of the 531 era.
Tubing from the 1970's and 80's has no relevance in comparison to modern tubing except for its nostalgic or historical value.
In terms of metallurgy, I doubt if any of the Japanese tubes compare in terms of strength-to-weight ratios to True Temper's, Reynold's and Columbus's best offerings, but they do compare favorably in quality of manufacture.
#24
snob
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would totally believe this. I grew up around people who worked in steel mills, and would often hear tales of how steel is suffering from poor workmanship and cost cutting just like everything else. One of the things I remember hearing specifically is that Japanese steel (mind you, this is building-grade steel) is so cheap that all the American contractors are using it in skyscrapers, but when they use/cut it it practically falls apart compared to American steel.
The only Japanese steel that matters is Hatori Hanzo.
The only Japanese steel that matters is Hatori Hanzo.
#25
King of the Hipsters
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,128
Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Well, let's discuss this xenophobia, or, more specifically, in regards to the Japanese, Nipponphobia.
Some of this will fly in the face of what we have learned from the movies, from government propaganda (school), and "Uncle Joe."
Prior to WWII, Japan produced the finest machine tools and steel in the world, and very cost-effectively.
America and Britain could not compete with Japan on the world market, in terms of quality and price, but especially in terms of quality.
Following WWII, the Japanese literally had nothing except burned-out urban rubble and farms operated by surviving mothers, wives and daughters.
In order to rebuild, Japan needed cash flow, and with few production resources, Japan chose and filled the very bottom production niche of the cheapest goods possible (late 1940's and early 1950's).
That said, by the early 1960's, Japanese industry had regained its feet, and had re-established itself as the quality center of the planet.
Anyone who wanted a specific product produced to the absolutely highest standards would contract with Japanese manufacturers to produce that product.
In the American firearms industry, Browning, for example, contracted with Japanese machine shops to produce specialty firearms for the collector market (the Browning/Winchester Model 1892 comes to mind).
When it comes to Japanese quality today, I think it will suffice to simply say Honda, Acura, Toyota, Lexus, Subaru, and Mazda.
Regarding Japanese bicycle tubing, the Keirin NJS market requires lugged construction, and so the Japanese have not attempted to develop so-called "air-hardening" steels (which have no real use outside of the TIG-welding process) and, instead, have focused on very clean (low impurity and low inclusion) low-alloy (the best steels have less than 2% non-iron ingredients) steels; and, the Japanese have focused on the tubing fabrication process so as to make seamless tubing of very consistent and sophisticated dimensions (quad-butted, etc.).
Apart from "air-hardening" steel intended for TIG welding, the best bicycle tubing probably comes from Japan, although, I think the American manufacturer True Temper would hold up their flagship tubing, S3, as the best tubing for lugged and fillet-brazed construction.
I assume Columbus has a tubing comparable to True Temper S3 and the Japanese NJS steels, intended for lugged construction, but I don't know that much about Columbus tubing (I really only know what I read).
The Italians have thousands of years of good reputation as metal-workers and today many international manufacturers go to the Italians to have their metal prototypes made as proof of concept.
However, when it comes to quality of manufacturing, when quality matters most, the world goes to Japanese manufacturers and contracts with them.
Some of this will fly in the face of what we have learned from the movies, from government propaganda (school), and "Uncle Joe."
Prior to WWII, Japan produced the finest machine tools and steel in the world, and very cost-effectively.
America and Britain could not compete with Japan on the world market, in terms of quality and price, but especially in terms of quality.
Following WWII, the Japanese literally had nothing except burned-out urban rubble and farms operated by surviving mothers, wives and daughters.
In order to rebuild, Japan needed cash flow, and with few production resources, Japan chose and filled the very bottom production niche of the cheapest goods possible (late 1940's and early 1950's).
That said, by the early 1960's, Japanese industry had regained its feet, and had re-established itself as the quality center of the planet.
Anyone who wanted a specific product produced to the absolutely highest standards would contract with Japanese manufacturers to produce that product.
In the American firearms industry, Browning, for example, contracted with Japanese machine shops to produce specialty firearms for the collector market (the Browning/Winchester Model 1892 comes to mind).
When it comes to Japanese quality today, I think it will suffice to simply say Honda, Acura, Toyota, Lexus, Subaru, and Mazda.
Regarding Japanese bicycle tubing, the Keirin NJS market requires lugged construction, and so the Japanese have not attempted to develop so-called "air-hardening" steels (which have no real use outside of the TIG-welding process) and, instead, have focused on very clean (low impurity and low inclusion) low-alloy (the best steels have less than 2% non-iron ingredients) steels; and, the Japanese have focused on the tubing fabrication process so as to make seamless tubing of very consistent and sophisticated dimensions (quad-butted, etc.).
Apart from "air-hardening" steel intended for TIG welding, the best bicycle tubing probably comes from Japan, although, I think the American manufacturer True Temper would hold up their flagship tubing, S3, as the best tubing for lugged and fillet-brazed construction.
I assume Columbus has a tubing comparable to True Temper S3 and the Japanese NJS steels, intended for lugged construction, but I don't know that much about Columbus tubing (I really only know what I read).
The Italians have thousands of years of good reputation as metal-workers and today many international manufacturers go to the Italians to have their metal prototypes made as proof of concept.
However, when it comes to quality of manufacturing, when quality matters most, the world goes to Japanese manufacturers and contracts with them.