I hate Cyclistats*********!!!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 380
Bikes: Peugeot something 1975
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I hate Cyclistats*********!!!
Well, I'm sure it's a very good program but, dang it, it listed my BMI as 39.5! My system of denial just wasn't ready for that. Too much information if you ask me!!
Last edited by Little Darwin; 08-21-09 at 04:05 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 380
Bikes: Peugeot something 1975
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
It's supposed to say, "I HATE cyclistats". But I misspelled it and now the edit won't let me change it. What a day!!!!!
#3
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Changed the title for you.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#5
Senior Member
i've been following your posts, turtlewoman.
i find them thoughtful, kind, and entertaining......thankyou!
gotta ask: Whats BMI?
Best,
Cyril
i find them thoughtful, kind, and entertaining......thankyou!
gotta ask: Whats BMI?
Best,
Cyril
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 380
Bikes: Peugeot something 1975
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Thank you, Cyril, for the kind words. One thing I really like about the C/A forum is how supportive everybody is. I know I can always get a good word and a helping hand and that's what makes me keep coming back! Thanks everyone.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 93
Bikes: Trek 7.3FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All it is saying is you need a grow a couple more inches ;-)
Keep at it. We all have our daze. Keep pedaling.
Keep at it. We all have our daze. Keep pedaling.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 380
Bikes: Peugeot something 1975
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Grow---a----couple----more-----inches? That's a great idea. I think there's a doctor in Taiwan who will stretch you for the right price.
#15
Lone Star
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm on Livestrong.com (not .org) I'm using their tools like Daily Plate and Lances Loops and the advice I'm getting on diabetes is pretty good. Only problem is I've got all this stuff to keep track of. I'm way low on calories, but I'm probably not doing so hot with my sodium and carb intake. I know having a couple of eggs in the morning seems to shoot my cholesterol all to heck. Maybe I need more of those "empty calories" I keep hearing about. Do they make those with just the calories but with out the sodium, carbs and cholesterol? I know last Wednesday when I did my 25 miles my total calorie intake for the whole day was 350-ish.
Yeah, there is a BMI thing but I refuse to do it. I'm sure I'd be a svelt eight foot tall guy.
Yeah, there is a BMI thing but I refuse to do it. I'm sure I'd be a svelt eight foot tall guy.
#16
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 279
Bikes: 1992 Trek 950, 1994 Canondale M600, 2000 Cannondale C300, 2004 Santa Cruz Juliana, 2010 Salsa Vaya, 2013 Jamis Dragon - Team Issue, 2019 Salsa Timberjack, 2020 Tern Vektron
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times
in
6 Posts
BMI is a very simplistic indicator of fitness/health, and while it is very popular these days, IMHO it is widely overused and is rarely qualified in literature as the "ballpark" indicator of fitness that it is; nor does it mention in any literature that I've found, that the BMI indicator is exclusive of a substantial population of people. Any indicator of fitness that only considers height and weight, will not account for body type, muscle mass, muscle and fat distribution, etc. A more accurate indicator of overall health in relation to body "mass" is body fat %.
I know from personal experience... my body type is an outlier when it comes to BMI calculations. Given my height, sex,and age, my lean body mass (total body mass (weight in lbs) - body fat (weight in lbs) is expected to fall between 70 and 95 lbs. In other words, this is the "normal" range of lean body mass for someone of my sex and height. Each time (over the course of 25yrs) I've gotten my % body fat measured, I've have had a consistent lean body mass of 119-120lbs. That means, at whatever level of fitness (or how old I am), my total body weight - the weight of my fat, has consistently come in around 119-120lbs. (As I get older and my excercise levels decline, I should lose muscle mass...but so far I've remained fairly constant.) So, ... if my % body fat were 14% (equivalent to an elite female athlete) ( I wish ), by BMI would be 24.9 - or just under the "overweight" category. Two more lbs would put me up to a 14.5% body fat and a BMI of over 25... which is considered "overweight". And trust me...if I were anywhere near 14.5% body fat, I would not be overweight. A similar argument could have been made in the late 70's when I so desperately tried to attain the American Heart Association target weight for my height, which was 125. I would be dead if I weighed 125
There is nothing wrong with knowing one's BMI - and in fact it can be an inspiring factor to track while attaining health/weight loss goals. Just keep in mind that it does not take into account muscle mass. It's easy to get caught up in "the numbers"...and when I find myself getting discouraged by them, I try to focus on my strength...and all the amazing things my body is capable of doing.
Stay strong Turtlewoman, and enjoy the strength in you emerging...
I know from personal experience... my body type is an outlier when it comes to BMI calculations. Given my height, sex,and age, my lean body mass (total body mass (weight in lbs) - body fat (weight in lbs) is expected to fall between 70 and 95 lbs. In other words, this is the "normal" range of lean body mass for someone of my sex and height. Each time (over the course of 25yrs) I've gotten my % body fat measured, I've have had a consistent lean body mass of 119-120lbs. That means, at whatever level of fitness (or how old I am), my total body weight - the weight of my fat, has consistently come in around 119-120lbs. (As I get older and my excercise levels decline, I should lose muscle mass...but so far I've remained fairly constant.) So, ... if my % body fat were 14% (equivalent to an elite female athlete) ( I wish ), by BMI would be 24.9 - or just under the "overweight" category. Two more lbs would put me up to a 14.5% body fat and a BMI of over 25... which is considered "overweight". And trust me...if I were anywhere near 14.5% body fat, I would not be overweight. A similar argument could have been made in the late 70's when I so desperately tried to attain the American Heart Association target weight for my height, which was 125. I would be dead if I weighed 125
There is nothing wrong with knowing one's BMI - and in fact it can be an inspiring factor to track while attaining health/weight loss goals. Just keep in mind that it does not take into account muscle mass. It's easy to get caught up in "the numbers"...and when I find myself getting discouraged by them, I try to focus on my strength...and all the amazing things my body is capable of doing.
Stay strong Turtlewoman, and enjoy the strength in you emerging...