Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Lesson Learned About Climbing

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Lesson Learned About Climbing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-09, 10:17 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lewisburg, PA
Posts: 129

Bikes: Giant FCR 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lesson Learned About Climbing

So today the weather was finally nice. I had a rough day and was really looking forward to riding and as I started, I felt really good. I was thinking that there was a good chance I was going to crush my best time on my normal 18-mile route. So living in central PA, I regularly run into hills. This one in particular has some meaning to me because I had my first fall on it (my own mistake, I learned that your front derailleur doesn't like it when you're climbing and you try to downshift). So anyway, I'm 6'5 and 265 lbs. I currently ride a Giant FCR 2 and I really want to get a "real" road bike this winter/spring. I'm planning to go with a compact crank on a double chainring as opposed to the non-compact/triple that I currently have. With that being said, I'm trying to stay away from my smallest chainring so that I can try to get used to not having all those lower gears.

I was really putting a lot of torque into this short, yet steep, climb. I got to the top and started to head down the other side only to find out that in about 50 feet, PennDOT had oiled and graveled the road. I slowed down and decided that I'd ride slowly across the 150 yards or so until it passed. About halfway through, I started to notice that my pedals felt weird...my left one especially. I looked down and the crank was halfway off! I started to slow down to figure out what was going on and it came completely off...just dangling there by my shoe! Since I carry a multi-tool, I was able to get the crank back on and I decided to take the "back way" home so that I could go real easy. Now, my local LBS said to come back in for a free "tune up", so I figure this is as good a time as any. I trust them, so it should work out fine.

Anyway, since I'm really into the idea of a dedicated road bike, this brings up some concerns for me. Like I said, I'm riding a Giant FCR 2 and so far my top two bikes for consideration are a Giant TCR Alliance 1 and a Trek 2.3 (this LBS sells Giant, Trek, and Masi). The Giant uses the same wheels that are on my FCR and they haven't let me down yet, plus I really like the way the Giant looks, so I'm leaning a bit that way. I also don't have much experience with Trek. Anyway, the crankset on my FCR is an FSA Omega. Here are my questions:

1. Does it sound like it's an issue with the crankset, or just my weight or riding style?
2. I know the FSA Omega is toward the bottom of the line, so would a "higher up" FSA give me more strength, or is there another crankset to consider on a new bike?
3. Being Clydes...we all know that there's more to consider than just potholes...at least I think that sometimes when I'm really spinning fast that I'm a bit harder on my frame. With that being said, is a carbon/aluminum mixed frame going to support my weight/torque? Would an aluminum frame with carbon seat stays (Trek) support it as well? Or do I need to stick with all aluminum?

Sorry for such a long post, but there seems to be a wealth of knowledge here, so I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this for me.

Thanks!
markdavid570 is offline  
Old 08-21-09, 10:35 PM
  #2  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Well, at 240, I snapped an aluminum frame.

ON your crank, I think you need to view a gearchart. You don't use the small chainring to avoid using smaller gears. NOT WISE! If you knew what the gear combos were, you'd see it's not wise to avoid the small ring. If you view the chart, you will notice that the small ring and the 4th tallest cog is about he same gear as a double crank with a 12/25 cassette.

Only thing you did was destroy your equipment by crosschaining for no reason....If you use th small chainring and the 21'ish cog, you have a starighter chainline while applying the torque of climbing.

My current frame is a carbon/CF mix. It hasn't snapped yet and I do plenty of climbing (5,000 -10,000 footers)
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 08-21-09, 10:47 PM
  #3  
staring at the mountains
 
superdex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560

Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times in 112 Posts
Originally Posted by markdavid570
1. Does it sound like it's an issue with the crankset, or just my weight or riding style?
2. I know the FSA Omega is toward the bottom of the line, so would a "higher up" FSA give me more strength, or is there another crankset to consider on a new bike?
3. Being Clydes...we all know that there's more to consider than just potholes...at least I think that sometimes when I'm really spinning fast that I'm a bit harder on my frame. With that being said, is a carbon/aluminum mixed frame going to support my weight/torque? Would an aluminum frame with carbon seat stays (Trek) support it as well? Or do I need to stick with all aluminum?
1) it's a crankset issue. I had the same problem with an FSA Gossamer crank and bottom bracket
2) I now run an FSA Carbon octalink crankset and have had zero issues. Note I'm no longer using the FSA external bearings bb.
3) If the Giant fits you, stay with it. That's more a determining factor than anything. If the Trek fits, and test rides give you warm fuzzies, do it. It's safe enough (I ride an AL with carbon seat stays and carbon seat post)

Granted, I'm a clyde-emeritus (194 now), I've ridden the above setup as heavy as 220 with no probs. I would stay with an aluminum seatpost in your case though (it's a little unnerving looking down at a flexing seatpost)
superdex is offline  
Old 08-22-09, 07:02 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lewisburg, PA
Posts: 129

Bikes: Giant FCR 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Beanz
Well, at 240, I snapped an aluminum frame.

ON your crank, I think you need to view a gearchart. You don't use the small chainring to avoid using smaller gears. NOT WISE! If you knew what the gear combos were, you'd see it's not wise to avoid the small ring. If you view the chart, you will notice that the small ring and the 4th tallest cog is about he same gear as a double crank with a 12/25 cassette.

Only thing you did was destroy your equipment by crosschaining for no reason....If you use th small chainring and the 21'ish cog, you have a starighter chainline while applying the torque of climbing.

My current frame is a carbon/CF mix. It hasn't snapped yet and I do plenty of climbing (5,000 -10,000 footers)
I've not viewed a gearchart. I've only gone by what feels easier to pedal...with less resistance...and that has been the smaller chainring. I've been using the larger two more...which has also mean not using the largest on my cassette because it doesn't keep the chainline very straight...especially when climbing. On this particular climb, the chainline was straight and I don't think I was in too high of a gear, especially seeing as I wanted to maintain some speed up the hill.

My issue is that the actual left crankarm came right off my bike. I guess what I'm trying to determine is whether it's an issue with it being a lower quality crankset and therefore with a better crankset I'll most likely avoid the issue. Or is it a problem that I'll have with just about any crankset?
markdavid570 is offline  
Old 08-22-09, 07:31 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Sacramento
Posts: 4,886
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Your cranks were probably just not torqued down tight enough.
__________________
-------

Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.
JoelS is offline  
Old 08-22-09, 08:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by markdavid570
I guess what I'm trying to determine is whether it's an issue with it being a lower quality crankset and therefore with a better crankset I'll most likely avoid the issue. Or is it a problem that I'll have with just about any crankset?
Sounds like lack of maintenance or improper assembly to me. As such, the problem could potentially happen with any crankset...
sstorkel is offline  
Old 08-22-09, 09:54 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lewisburg, PA
Posts: 129

Bikes: Giant FCR 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Does anyone ever worry about exceeding the weight limit on their crankset/arm?
markdavid570 is offline  
Old 08-22-09, 10:09 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Hill-Pumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In Oregon looking for more hills to ride
Posts: 834

Bikes: 2016 Niner RLT Steel, 2015 GT Grade Carbon 105, 2014 NS Bikes Eccentric, 2013 Norco Sight Killer B-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just a couple of observations, first, don't sweat the gearing the on the compact double. I have both, a compact double on my road bike, and a standard triple on my cross bike. Honestly, I can climb and hill that I have tried to date with my double. I very seldom use my lowest gear on my triple, but I may need it for pulling a trailer or a trail-a- bike later.

Second, don't sweat the toughness of the Giant Alliance frames. My road bike is a Giant OCR Alliance 1, and you won't be breaking it. They have a lifetime warranty and no weight limitations, so if that is what you want, then by all mean, go get one.
Hill-Pumper is offline  
Old 08-22-09, 12:19 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Herbie53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm not familiar with the FSA Omega, but I had an FSA SLK-Light carbon for awhile. After much re-adjustment, re-installation using the recommended fixes (some super secret yellow locktite), I finally gave in and bought DA 7800 crank on eBay.

I sold the FSA one to a non-clyde buddy and he's been very happy with it. I think the way the left crank arm fastens with the little spring washer and reliance on loctite is less than optimal for high torque applications (aka clydes).

Last edited by Herbie53; 08-22-09 at 01:15 PM.
Herbie53 is offline  
Old 08-22-09, 10:41 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lewisburg, PA
Posts: 129

Bikes: Giant FCR 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Herbie53
I'm not familiar with the FSA Omega, but I had an FSA SLK-Light carbon for awhile. After much re-adjustment, re-installation using the recommended fixes (some super secret yellow locktite), I finally gave in and bought DA 7800 crank on eBay.

I sold the FSA one to a non-clyde buddy and he's been very happy with it. I think the way the left crank arm fastens with the little spring washer and reliance on loctite is less than optimal for high torque applications (aka clydes).
That's the same thing I'm wondering. With that in mind, I want to look into other cranksets that maybe have a stronger "connection" and just ask the LBS to switch it out when I buy the bike. I figure if I'm going to spend some money on a new bike that I want to last for awhile, I might as well spend just a bit more to get it up to the components that will work/last for me.

Just a couple of observations, first, don't sweat the gearing the on the compact double. I have both, a compact double on my road bike, and a standard triple on my cross bike. Honestly, I can climb and hill that I have tried to date with my double. I very seldom use my lowest gear on my triple, but I may need it for pulling a trailer or a trail-a- bike later.

Second, don't sweat the toughness of the Giant Alliance frames. My road bike is a Giant OCR Alliance 1, and you won't be breaking it. They have a lifetime warranty and no weight limitations, so if that is what you want, then by all mean, go get one.
Thanks for that. The carbon/aluminum mix of the TCR Alliance makes me a bit nervous, but I've read about a lot of good experiences so far.

Thanks!
markdavid570 is offline  
Old 08-23-09, 09:01 AM
  #11  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by markdavid570
With that being said, I'm trying to stay away from my smallest chainring so that I can try to get used to not having all those lower gears.

I was really putting a lot of torque into this short, yet steep, climb.

Originally Posted by markdavid570
I've been using the larger two more...which has also mean not using the largest on my cassette because it doesn't keep the chainline very straight...especially when climbing. On this particular climb, the chainline was straight and I don't think I was in too high of a gear, especially seeing as I wanted to maintain some speed up the hill.

You are 265 lbs and can crank up a "steep" climb in the mid-ring without touching the tallest cog in back? That's great!....You should skip the compact and go with a standard double!
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 08-23-09, 10:33 AM
  #12  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by markdavid570
That's the same thing I'm wondering. With that in mind, I want to look into other cranksets that maybe have a stronger "connection" and just ask the LBS to switch it out when I buy the bike. I figure if I'm going to spend some money on a new bike that I want to last for awhile, I might as well spend just a bit more to get it up to the components that will work/last for me.
Your problem isn't with the crank but, as others have said, with the torque on the crank bolt. The connection is strong enough but it has to be at the proper torque to get the proper strength. I always torque crank bolts. I haven't had a crank come off a spindle in 20+ years of riding and wrenching

There may be an issue with this crank, however. On square tapers, a crank that loosens enough to come off is ruined. On splined cranks, you may or may not have the same issue. The interface is different but you could have damaged the splines. Best to have it looked at before you ride much more.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 08-23-09, 06:09 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lewisburg, PA
Posts: 129

Bikes: Giant FCR 2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Beanz
You are 265 lbs and can crank up a "steep" climb in the mid-ring without touching the tallest cog in back? That's great!....You should skip the compact and go with a standard double!
Haha...well thanks. At 265 keep in mind that I'm also 6'5. I guess I'm built like a linebacker (even though I was a soccer player...but a keeper at that). So while I have some weight that I definitely want to lose, I have a decent amount of muscle that I worry can cause more wear and tear on a bike. I guess that's what I really worry about with being a clyde. Not just the excess weight, but also the extra force that comes with the weight combined with the muscle. Ugh...I don't know.

I'm planning to look at the crank arm again tonight and get it all tightened up, but I think it's definitely time to take it out to the shop for my first free tune up. It'll give me some peace of mind.
markdavid570 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.