Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

cassette for racing (compact crank)

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

cassette for racing (compact crank)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-11, 03:03 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cassette for racing (compact crank)

Hello,

I plan on racing for the first time this year. So far I've only raced in tri's. Anyway...in addition to my triathlon races, I'd like to do one crit and one road race (hilly). I'm running a compact on my roadbike. Do I have to switch to a standard to keep up? Or are racers able to get by with a compact (I don't expect to win). Also...right now I'm running a 11-23 cassette. It has worked pretty good. I'm wondering though if a 11-25 or 11-27 might be better for hills? Can I just use a compact(50/34) crank plus a 11-27 cassette for just about any race I plan on doing? Or is that an awful compromise?

Thanks!
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 01-09-11, 03:22 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Locally, we have a couple race courses where a 50 x 11 is not high enough to stay in contention. One is an auto racetrack that often finishes down a dragstrip with a 25mph+ tailwind assist. Another is a hilly course where you can crack 50mph+ on an extended descent if you can deliver some power at those speeds. But if you're a first-time racer, start with your compact and see how it goes. Just don't give up your 11 in back.

As for cassettes, can you try out your existing setup on the racecourse? Personally, I like the 11-23 because it includes every cog from 11 to 17 before starting into multi-tooth jumps, so I can stay near my preferred cadence. But then again, you don't want to be halfway through a race and find that you've overextended yourself and need a lower gear to keep your head above water, either.

If you do get a wider-range cassette, plan to get a new chain for it. You'll need more length to handle a 27 or 28 for sure, and it's best to keep your chain and cassette at similar levels of wear.
mechBgon is offline  
Old 01-09-11, 03:25 PM
  #3  
Glimmers of form
 
esammuli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,542

Bikes: Cannondale SystemSix 3, Specialized Stumpjumper M4 Comp

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I went from 3->2 and 2->1 using a 50-34 with either a 11-23 or 11-26 cassette. You should be fine in the 5's.
esammuli is offline  
Old 01-09-11, 03:41 PM
  #4  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ohioland/right near hicville farmtown
Posts: 4,813
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by esammuli
I went from 3->2 and 2->1 using a 50-34 with either a 11-23 or 11-26 cassette. You should be fine in the 5's.
+1 (not that im a 1) you shouldnt worry about gearing, you'll almost always have more than enough of a gear.
jsutkeepspining is offline  
Old 01-09-11, 03:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks!
teamtrinity is offline  
Old 01-09-11, 04:39 PM
  #6  
impressive member
 
badhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: fort collins
Posts: 2,706

Bikes: c'dale supersix, jamis trilogy, spec. tricross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
if you really wanna cover your bases, i had good results as a 4 with a compact crank with a 52 and a 36, and a 11-23 and an 11-26 for steeper, longer efforts.
badhat is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 10:23 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
graphs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 856
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ that's my plan for this year. Going to order the chainrings this month.
graphs is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 11:26 AM
  #8  
BALM Co.
 
2005trek1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 331

Bikes: 2010 Aerocat rR350, 2010 Aerocat R750, 2014 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Bianchi Trofeo, 2013 Trek Ion Pro CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by badhat
if you really wanna cover your bases, i had good results as a 4 with a compact crank with a 52 and a 36, and a 11-23 and an 11-26 for steeper, longer efforts.
Is that what you used for Sunshine and Rist last year?
2005trek1200 is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 01:12 PM
  #9  
cmh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,910
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times in 161 Posts
I've used a 50x34, 11-23 for all my racing Cat 5 through Cat 2. I've been undergeared in 2 races. Big tailwind in one, big downhill in the other.
cmh is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 01:28 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Colorado Spring, CO
Posts: 652

Bikes: Vail Cycle Works - Ti

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use an 11-27; no problems.
wacomme is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 01:50 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
milliron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco Peninsula
Posts: 768

Bikes: 1997 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Should be noted that the 50x11 is actually a bigger gear then the 53x12 that a lot of people run.
milliron is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 02:19 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I use a 50/34 and 12-27 for everything except the Everest Challenge where I use a 12-30.
I've not had high enough gears once, in a race that featured a long slightly downhill section with a really stiff tail wind. Normally on descents I have to draft larger riders anyhow so not being able to pedal isn't a problem. But in this race the tailwind negated most of the effects of the draft. I can spin the 50x12 to 40 mph to get on someone's wheel but I can't do it for 20 minutes.

I'll bring an 11t cog next time.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 01-10-11, 03:37 PM
  #13  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
Depends on the terrain. I use a 53-39, with a 12-25. I would only use an 11 a few times a year. I'd rather stick with the 12 and have 1 more cog in the middle that would get used all the time.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 01-12-11, 04:05 PM
  #14  
impressive member
 
badhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: fort collins
Posts: 2,706

Bikes: c'dale supersix, jamis trilogy, spec. tricross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 2005trek1200
Is that what you used for Sunshine and Rist last year?
i think so, yeah.

i made the switch earlier in the season but i dont remember when.


as side note, i ended up with a full sized crank on my new bike this year and took it out for a group ride on saturday and realized, within an hour, without counting or checking, that the cassette was a a 12 instead of an 11. the 12 was a noticeable limter, even with the 53 vs the 52 i've been riding for a year. only on downhills obviously, but it was still annoying.
badhat is offline  
Old 01-12-11, 04:32 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
ttusomeone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 340
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Last year was my first year racing and used a compact crank with an 11-26 rear cassette. I felt like I did fine with this setup. However, I will say that I changed to a standard crank and can tell a big difference (I like it much better and fell like I can maintain a cruising speed in the pack easier). I don't know how much of this is in my head vs. actual difference. For your first year, you'll be fine...if you want to get more competitive in the following years, you may want to consider making the switch.
ttusomeone is offline  
Old 01-13-11, 07:07 AM
  #16  
fair weather cyclist
 
pjcampbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Green Mountains
Posts: 1,368

Bikes: Colnago c50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
1I use a 34-50 with 13-26 and never have been dropped do to spinning out.

Big downhill can be tough... usually end up tucking and coasting. 50x13 @ 120 rpm is 36mph on a flat .
pjcampbell is offline  
Old 01-13-11, 11:27 PM
  #17  
Gunner.
 
robncircus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 1,735

Bikes: Giant TCR, Spooky Skeletor, Pivot Mach 6

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
I race with a compact and it's not the crankset that makes me slow. I use an 11/27 casette.
robncircus is offline  
Old 01-14-11, 09:57 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
With an 11-23 cassette on a 50/34 compact crank, you are basically running similar to a 53/39 with a 12-25 cassette. The only problem with compact cranksets is they drop chains more easily because of the smaller diameter small ring. If you are into spending money, you'll be fine on a 53/39 and it'll be a bit more reliable, but you are probably just as well off keeping what you have and racing for a while.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 01-14-11, 02:11 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
RudeSiggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 718

Bikes: '07 Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL, DuraAce, Easton EA90 Aero Wheels (or MAVIC Carbone SLs)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by esammuli
I went from 3->2 and 2->1 using a 50-34 with either a 11-23 or 11-26 cassette. You should be fine in the 5's.
I went from 4->3 and 3->2 these past two years with 50-34 and those same two cassette ranges. That was 2 seasons, about 50-some races, including Green Mountain Stage Race, which has some of the most varied terrain/conditions you can get. You'll probably be fine with what you've got. I can also say that I only used the cassette with the 26 in three races - two local climbing competitions (one where I didn't need it) and also the queen climbing stage of GMSR where you head up App Gap.

If you find you need gears anywhere, it'll be a bigger cog in the back for uber steep climbs (climbs = longer than hills). That's a simple and relatively cheap cassette swap compared to new chainrings.


Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
The only problem with compact cranksets is they drop chains more easily because of the smaller diameter small ring.
Once you get used to it, it's not a problem. It's a user cognizance issue. You just have to shift either earlier or later on the hills than what you're used to with bigger rings. If the OP has always ridden compact, he'll be used to the shifting.

Last edited by RudeSiggy; 01-14-11 at 02:13 PM. Reason: added pablum
RudeSiggy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
revchuck
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
35
03-25-13 09:27 AM
newjunior
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
17
11-18-12 10:13 PM
Sean T
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
6
09-19-11 04:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.