Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Fork Faceoff!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-11, 09:55 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fork Faceoff!

For my first full season of mountain biking, I have decided to purchase a 29er. Due to price range, test riding, and availability my favored local bike store I have decided I am going to purchase a Cannondale Trail SL 29'er.

Right now, I am leaning toward the SL 2 model - This guy here. For reference, this is the other model I am considering.

The question here is whether I'm going to, with my weight (280-300ish), destroy the air fork (really, an air fork in general) on the nicer model. I'd really rather have the 9-speed setup, hydraulic brakes, etc...but I'd also rather not blow my fork apart on the trail.

(If there's a primer on this, I would super appreciate a link - I've been doing a bit of googling/forum searching and have not found it.)
GetHerned is offline  
Old 02-23-11, 11:11 PM
  #2  
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Posts: 11,758
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
Only thing I've seen on that was in the past, I had downloaded Cannondale's catalog, and it has maximum rider weights in it. But they're basically the same for all of the same style of bike (likely, all the mountain bikes would have the same rating, for example.)
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
StephenH is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 12:45 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
JohnA42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 186
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I assume you rode the SL-2? Hit any good bumps on it? How did it feel? How did the bike react when braking?

I'm in your weight class and you're right to be concerned about air shocks in general. I test rode a bunch of bikes that had low-budget air shocks on them and it was like riding a rocking chair. (Plus major front wheel dive when braking.) I ended up with a Kona Hoss which has an air shock on it -- no issues.
JohnA42 is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 07:19 AM
  #4  
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
You say you test rode. I assume that means at least one of these bikes. How did the fork perform? Did you get it out into conditions similar to what and where you plan to do your riding? Did it bottom out frequently, or at all? Is it adjustable, or does it have a complete lockout setting?

FWIW, I got my Fisher when I was just under 300 lbs and while it exhibited a bit of nose dive under hard braking at that weight, the fork has really never been much of an issue, at least for the pavement riding I do with it. I've never taken it off road.
CraigB is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 08:07 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by GetHerned
For my first full season of mountain biking, I have decided to purchase a 29er. Due to price range, test riding, and availability my favored local bike store I have decided I am going to purchase a Cannondale Trail SL 29'er.

Right now, I am leaning toward the SL 2 model - This guy here. For reference, this is the other model I am considering.

The question here is whether I'm going to, with my weight (280-300ish), destroy the air fork (really, an air fork in general) on the nicer model. I'd really rather have the 9-speed setup, hydraulic brakes, etc...but I'd also rather not blow my fork apart on the trail.

(If there's a primer on this, I would super appreciate a link - I've been doing a bit of googling/forum searching and have not found it.)
Suspension forks in general are not made for 300lb riders, the way an air-shock works is that it uses air pressure to hold up the weight, the problem is that there are seals to hold the air pressure where it should be, and those seals have a maximum pressure rating. If you exceed that pressure, then the seals could blow, and you may find that it's not covered by warranty. The SL-2 has a Deuce Air fork, which is one RST makes for Cannondale. If you look at the fork manual you will find a table where for weight X the pressure that should be used is Y, that number tops out at 260lbs, you can probably push it a little past that, but you can't be sure by how much. Of course you could always lose 40lbs....
Wogster is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 11:09 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GetHerned
The question here is whether I'm going to, with my weight (280-300ish), destroy the air fork (really, an air fork in general) on the nicer model. I'd really rather have the 9-speed setup, hydraulic brakes, etc...but I'd also rather not blow my fork apart on the trail.
The forks on both bikes appear to be entry-level equipment. Heck, you could spend as much money on some Fox forks as it would cost to buy a base-model SL29er! As such, I would expect that you're outside the recommended weight range. In your situation, I would ask your LBS two questions: 1) what sort of fork problems does the bike's warranty cover and how are they addressed, and 2) how much does it cost to rebuild the fork if the seals blow after the warranty expires? I'd be especially concerned if your shop can't work on the fork in-house, or if the fork has to be sent back to the factory for warranty work.

Unfortunately, there just aren't a lot of great suspension options for Clydes. If you buy a coil-spring fork, it'll be difficult/impossible to find a spring matched to your weight. Air springs are a better bet, but many models aren't designed to handle Clyde-type weights. If I were in your shoes, my strategy would be to start saving now for a replacement fork and make sure that your LBS will stand behind the fork you're going to get with the bike. You might even negotiate this into the purchase: tell them you think you'll want to upgrade the fork within 6-12 months and ask what sort of deal they'll guarantee on that future purchase. Have them make a note about the discount ("New fork for cost+15% within 12 months of purchase") on the paperwork you get with the bike, so they don't forget.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 12:44 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you, everyone, for your input.

I think that at the end of the day, I'm going to go with the SL 4 (the lower-priced model with the coil fork) - simply because everything on the bike seems pretty decent to begin with (for entry-level gear, that is) and is able to be ridden until it breaks and then upgraded if necessary.

For reference, last season I put about a thousand miles on a lowest-of-the low Suntour fork, split between street and trail riding and it's still in pretty decent shape. This fork looks to be of higher quality, so I'd imagine I'll be able to put at least that amount of punishment on there.
GetHerned is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 03:33 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
If it were me, I'd go with the SL2. Hydraulic brakes and a 9-speed drive-train combined with Deore shifters, Deore rear derailleur, and a Shimano crank would be a big plus for me. In addition, with an air spring fork you're probably more likely to be able to achieve the proper amount of sag, or at least get close, and thus suspension response.

If you want a coil spring fork to work well, it is imperative that you acquire and install a spring matched to your weight. This may be difficult, especially on a low-end fork. Pounding around on a under-sprung fork is a great recipe for breaking something.

Have you ridden both bikes on your local trails? Was the suspension setup so that it didn't bottom out? If so, then there's probably nothing to worry about...
sstorkel is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 04:37 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The test-riding I did was on suburban streets behind the store, as that was what I was able to do at the time. HOwever, I did make sure to go up and down a few curbs to test the suspension and neither fork bottomed out.

If I can use the air fork and not demolish it, I'm all for the SL2 - the other components on there are a very nice package.

Last edited by GetHerned; 02-24-11 at 04:38 PM. Reason: (Poor word choice)
GetHerned is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 05:58 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GetHerned
If I can use the air fork and not demolish it, I'm all for the SL2 - the other components on there are a very nice package.
I have to admit: this is usually what I do... an it's not a terribly good test. A single bump is usually pretty easy for the suspension to handle. The problem is when you have multiple bumps in quick succession. If the suspension doesn't have enough rebound, it can start to "pack" with each successive bump to the point where it is fully compressed after several bumps.

I'd ask your LBS for their guidance on whether the bike is appropriate for the riding you intend to do. Cannondale's on-line manuals seem to suggest that most of their bikes are rated for riders of up to 300lbs, so you're probably fine. Still, it wouldn't be a bad idea to budget for having the fork re-built once or twice per year. That's why I suggested asking the shop how much a rebuild would cost. The parts are usually cheap; it's a question of how much labor is involved.
sstorkel is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlatFender
Mountain Biking
11
11-06-16 03:57 PM
corrado33
General Cycling Discussion
46
06-14-15 04:05 PM
bakerjw
Bicycle Mechanics
8
10-12-14 08:26 AM
wapiti
Mountain Biking
2
09-22-11 04:38 PM
helmut
Mountain Biking
16
12-08-09 09:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.