Tire width proportioned to rider weight
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213
Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tire width proportioned to rider weight
Couldn't even try searching this, it's kind of "hard" to look this up..but......
I weigh 180-190#, and have been running 700x23 since I started riding newer bikes... the amount of deflection when I ride kinda scares me, so would going to 25 or 28 make any difference? I know they'd be a bit slower due to increased contact w/ the road....unless I"m wrong there too
I weigh 180-190#, and have been running 700x23 since I started riding newer bikes... the amount of deflection when I ride kinda scares me, so would going to 25 or 28 make any difference? I know they'd be a bit slower due to increased contact w/ the road....unless I"m wrong there too
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
How much pressure are you running?
Either get higher pressure tires for less deflection or get larger tires.
I switched from a 23 to a 28 in the back (and inflate the 28 to about 120 psi vs 145 for the 23) I honestly can't tell a difference at all.
I'm sure someone will say "If you're not getting pinch flats, there's nothing to worry about." which is probs true.
Either get higher pressure tires for less deflection or get larger tires.
I switched from a 23 to a 28 in the back (and inflate the 28 to about 120 psi vs 145 for the 23) I honestly can't tell a difference at all.
I'm sure someone will say "If you're not getting pinch flats, there's nothing to worry about." which is probs true.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213
Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I actually have been....more specifically 120 in the front and 130 in the rear. This is with wire-beaded Gatorskins...
#6
Goes to 11.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wichita, KS, USA
Posts: 2,547
Bikes: 2015 Soma Double Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
At 245 lbs., I've been running 700x23 tires for 8 months now. The ride is terribly harsh and I have to be very careful to make sure my tires are inflated before every ride, but my rims have stayed straight and true. I've only ever had to worry about deflection when hitting a crack or pothole, but I know how to "get light".
However, after finally finding a set of 28s locally, I can say the difference in ride quality is night and day.
However, after finally finding a set of 28s locally, I can say the difference in ride quality is night and day.
#7
I just wanna ride
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chico Califo
Posts: 1,155
Bikes: 2013 BMC Impec
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The actual contact patch on a 25 is probably smaller for you than a 23 would be because of your size. I read a great article about it last year some time that gave great reasons for why this worked. Something to do with your weight on a smaller tire is pushing the tire flat long ways more than the added contact patch of a wider tire which will be conpressed less because of the greater air volume.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213
Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ok, so 2 votes for 28s and one for staying w/ 23s....
stryper, is that article online somewhere?
stryper, is that article online somewhere?
#9
Fresh Garbage
That said, I have been using wide tires lately (28 and 35mm) and I don't see myself going back unless the frame limits me.
tandems with 23s come to mind
Last edited by hairnet; 05-22-11 at 07:10 PM.
#10
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
Use the following formulas to determine proper tire pressure as a function of rider weight and tire section:
Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 33.33
Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 26.67
Front Pressure = .9*Rear Pressure
For example, the OP weighs 185 lbs and uses 23mm wide tires, so Rear Tire Pressure = 0.33 x 185 + 53.33 = 114 psi. Front Tire Pressure = 0.9 x 114 = 103 psi.
Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 33.33
Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 26.67
Front Pressure = .9*Rear Pressure
For example, the OP weighs 185 lbs and uses 23mm wide tires, so Rear Tire Pressure = 0.33 x 185 + 53.33 = 114 psi. Front Tire Pressure = 0.9 x 114 = 103 psi.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 190
Bikes: Surly Steamroller
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I went from 32c vitt rando's on my steamroller to 35c schwalbe delta cruisers and the 35's actually feel faster becuase they absorb the road abuse so much better. I am 250lbs and 6'1" by the way. On my Big Block I run 28c randos and they have been fine so far.
#15
coasterbrakelockup
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 824
Bikes: surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I weigh about the same as OP. 28's all day.
#16
Painfully average.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 947
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate 2006, Litespeed Pisgah , Specialized Roubaix 2008, Trek Madone 2011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Check out yer weight distribution and use the Berto chart.
https://www.livestrong.com/article/37...tion-pressure/
https://www.livestrong.com/article/37...tion-pressure/
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213
Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tejano, do I need to recalculate for a given load every time I carry stuff (other than myself)...?? When I commute to work I sometimes bring a 4# netbook, sometimes my lunch and drinks for at work...
#19
Paste Taster
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,392
Bikes: , Jury Bike, Moto Outcast 29, Spicer standard track frame and spicer custom steel sprint frame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Use the following formulas to determine proper tire pressure as a function of rider weight and tire section:
Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 33.33
Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 26.67
Front Pressure = .9*Rear Pressure
For example, the OP weighs 185 lbs and uses 23mm wide tires, so Rear Tire Pressure = 0.33 x 185 + 53.33 = 114 psi. Front Tire Pressure = 0.9 x 114 = 103 psi.
Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = (0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 33.33
Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = (0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs) + 26.67
Front Pressure = .9*Rear Pressure
For example, the OP weighs 185 lbs and uses 23mm wide tires, so Rear Tire Pressure = 0.33 x 185 + 53.33 = 114 psi. Front Tire Pressure = 0.9 x 114 = 103 psi.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,691
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 430 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
318 Posts
I'm in the 180s myself and have ridden tires ranging from 23-32. I still rock race tires (23) on my go-fast road bikes (and pinch flats are never a problem as long as I inflate my tires to proper pressure) but for casual riding/commuting I prefer something wider. I find 25s and 28s to be good compromises between speed and comfort but lately I've been riding 32s on my Bianchi San Jose and I love the comfort and ability to ride over anything (well, almost).
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
1 Post
Tejano, where is that formula from?
I've been a low-pressure kind of guy for a while (most are surprised just how low), and your math is pretty close to my practice. there are all kinds of arguments for it.
OP, you're absolutely fine on 25c (@ maybe 95/105?)...but that's no reason not to run 28c, if that's what you like.
I've been a low-pressure kind of guy for a while (most are surprised just how low), and your math is pretty close to my practice. there are all kinds of arguments for it.
OP, you're absolutely fine on 25c (@ maybe 95/105?)...but that's no reason not to run 28c, if that's what you like.
#22
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
I don't remember, but another member here originally posted it. I've been using it for all my non-competitive road riding on clincher tires ranging from 23mm to 37mm, and it seems to work really well. Higher pressures just make the tires ride like rocks w/o any noticeable gains in performance or flat resistance. Also, cornering traction in the rain is reduced significantly at higher pressures.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 213
Bikes: 2009 SE Draft SS, 2001 Trek 1000 Alpha roadie, 1991 Diamondback mtb & 1976 KHS Gran Sport mixte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tejano, what about mismatched tire widths, say a 23 in front and a 25 out back or even vice versa?