'87 C'dale ST400, what should I do first
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
'87 C'dale ST400, what should I do first
I still have my very first real bike, an '87 ST400.
The bike has been neglected by me but still rides fine. Most everything is original even the cables and housing. The only thing that isn't original are the saddle, pedals, handlebar tape, brake shoes and the Wheels, I switched over from 27" to 700c wheels after I was t-boned by a Harley and taco'ed my rear wheel.
My question is what should I do to it first besides replace the cables. Everything still works ok, despite never being taken in for a tune.
Is it worth the expense to upgrade the drivetrain or leave as is?
The bike has been neglected by me but still rides fine. Most everything is original even the cables and housing. The only thing that isn't original are the saddle, pedals, handlebar tape, brake shoes and the Wheels, I switched over from 27" to 700c wheels after I was t-boned by a Harley and taco'ed my rear wheel.
My question is what should I do to it first besides replace the cables. Everything still works ok, despite never being taken in for a tune.
Is it worth the expense to upgrade the drivetrain or leave as is?
#2
Senior Member
Ride it first, upgrade it later.
Whether or not "Its worth it" is a matter of opinion, however, I like mine.
Whether or not "Its worth it" is a matter of opinion, however, I like mine.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
Last edited by canopus; 05-27-11 at 01:31 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got an '87 ST400 in the stand myself right now. The catalog shows two colors, white and 'banana'. I've got the 'banana' with red decals, 100% original. I plan to upgrade the drivetrain in the future but for now it'll remain mostly original. I did however order a new 7 speed Shimano freewheel to replace the shot 6 speed SunTour. I've got indexed 7 speed downtube shifters to go with the new freewheel. Also have new chain, cables/housing, bar wrap, tires, tubes, and brake pads ready to install also.
I haven't ridden it yet but when I sat on it I smiled because the fit is near perfect. And with those long chain stays I think I'm going to like the way it rides. I already have plenty of 'race' bikes. So I'm thinking 'yeah', it'll be worth upgrading.
~kn
I haven't ridden it yet but when I sat on it I smiled because the fit is near perfect. And with those long chain stays I think I'm going to like the way it rides. I already have plenty of 'race' bikes. So I'm thinking 'yeah', it'll be worth upgrading.
~kn
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I do ride it although mostly on the trainer when the weather stinks, but I'm thinking of using it for commuting to work. I have an R800 as my main bike, although that is only about 10 years newer than the '87
Mine is white with the orange-ish lettering. I liked the Yellow Imron paint they used back then too, but they only had the white in my size. I really wanted the SR-400, but now I'm glad I ended up getting the ST-400 instead.
Mine is white with the orange-ish lettering. I liked the Yellow Imron paint they used back then too, but they only had the white in my size. I really wanted the SR-400, but now I'm glad I ended up getting the ST-400 instead.
#5
Godbotherer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hermitage, TN
Posts: 1,255
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR300 (full SRAM Apex) 1996 Cannondale R800 (Full SRAM Rival), 1997 Cannondale R200 (Shimano Tiagra), 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10-5, 1992 Bridgestone RB-1 (SRAM Force)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I wish I had left mine alone. . . then again I was working on my second bent rear axle due to the freewheel setup. . . if bent axles become a problem you might could look at the rear wheel as first target. Verify that your rear spacing is 128mm or not. Mine is.
#6
Godbotherer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hermitage, TN
Posts: 1,255
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR300 (full SRAM Apex) 1996 Cannondale R800 (Full SRAM Rival), 1997 Cannondale R200 (Shimano Tiagra), 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10-5, 1992 Bridgestone RB-1 (SRAM Force)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh, yeah, I forgot I did that too a long time ago. SACHS 7 speed 12-21T. . . I've long since worn that out. So that along with the bent axle, I'm in three times the cost of the bike on a 100% SRAM Rival redeux.
#7
Senior Member
I bought an old ST 400 at a fleamarket and it looks like the rear wheel is off center because it is closer to one chainstay near the crankbox. Is this normal for this frame? Sorry for a stupid question but I am quite perplexed by this frame. If it is straight I could use modern 130 mm rear wheels and I have an old Record Normal reach brakeset that allows me to use 700 cc wheels instead of the 27" set it was made for.
#8
Senior Member
My ST is the bike I do my longer distances on. Very rarely does it do less than 60 miles on a ride.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lucky you... I read this in rccardr's thread and thought 'great, I can use some modern wheels'. Upon measuring I find mine at actually 125mm which seems to much to spread an aluminum frame to put my modern 130mm wheel in there.
I don't know if it's normal but I've noticed that with mine also.
~kn
~kn
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Senior Member
If yours is spaced at 125 I would check it for any bending and alignment. All of mine have been 127 to 127.5. I don't remember any new ones back then having small spacing issues either.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
#14
Godbotherer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hermitage, TN
Posts: 1,255
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR300 (full SRAM Apex) 1996 Cannondale R800 (Full SRAM Rival), 1997 Cannondale R200 (Shimano Tiagra), 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10-5, 1992 Bridgestone RB-1 (SRAM Force)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,733
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
Even 125 is OK to take a 130 axle. Could be one of the dropouts is a little bent. No worries.
Anybody who wants replacement Suntour freewheels, Cyclone RD's or Accushift downtube shifters for these bikes, let me know. I have a bunch of them, yours for the cost of postage.
Anybody who wants replacement Suntour freewheels, Cyclone RD's or Accushift downtube shifters for these bikes, let me know. I have a bunch of them, yours for the cost of postage.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
On a side note... Anybody with one of these late 80's ST400 frames find them a bit odd. I mean the frame is all decked out 'touring' ready with double eyelets front and back, lowrider mounts on the fork, long chainstays. But yet it's outfitted with a double crank with 52/42 rings. And I'm looking at the clearance after mounting only 25mm tires on the stock 27" rims thinking fenders would be a SQUEEZE, if they fit at all.
~kn
#17
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,733
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
ST = sport/touring. Not intended for fat tires or fenders, more like relaxed geometry for credit card touring. If you go to 700's you canusually mount something a little thicker.
The higher end 600 and up ST's had triple rings, but so did many of the 400's even though they were not in the catalog. I've picked up two in the past six months that had SR Apex half step + grannies.
The higher end 600 and up ST's had triple rings, but so did many of the 400's even though they were not in the catalog. I've picked up two in the past six months that had SR Apex half step + grannies.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#18
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,524
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
+1 New bearings and grease. You risk destroying bb cups and hubs if you ride it as is. Assume those haven't been serviced in 25 years.
#19
Senior Member
It doesn't take long to service a bike, if the special tools are handy. A LBS can service a bottom bracket and freewheel and shouldn't be too expensive.
Brad
#20
Senior Member
A set of 700x32 and some 45mm fenders is the max you stuff under them. And you aren't taking that through any mud since the clearances are in the 2mm range.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
#21
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any suggestions on what currently available brakes might work with this frame and 700c wheels? The current/original brakes no longer stay centered and pull to one size when actuated.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
Lucky you... I read this in rccardr's thread and thought 'great, I can use some modern wheels'. Upon measuring I find mine at actually 125mm which seems to much to spread an aluminum frame to put my modern 130mm wheel in there.
I don't know if it's normal but I've noticed that with mine also.
~kn
I don't know if it's normal but I've noticed that with mine also.
~kn
#23
Senior Member
Henry - it didn't happen to be a blue T400 did it? I noticed your location and my son bought a T400 a few weeks ago in Neenah. I'm doing a few tweaks on it for him and I had to chuckle at your comment because I thought the downtube was huge too. I never knew they were that oversized.
__________________
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride - JFK
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride - JFK
#25
Senior Member
Yeah that's him. I rode it a little but the plastic on the cable housing in front of the RD kind of shattered so the indexing was off. I replace that and am waiting for a new cartridge BB. The spindle was fairly pitted and the cups had a little to so I decided to replace the whole thing. I'm anxious to give it another spin and see how stiff that huge frame is. It should make a sweet tourer for him.
__________________
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride - JFK
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride - JFK