tire doesn't fit frame
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: Springfield, IL
Bikes: Trek Allant 9.9s
tire doesn't fit frame
I dunno what's goin' on. Have a 700c rim, tried to put new Gatorskin 700c x 25 tires on the bike (Nishiki Olympic). Tire's rubbing on the brake bridge/thing that the brake attaches to on the bike (seen in pic). Is the rim not really a 700c? Rim says "avaya 7000". I could have sworn the inside of the rim said 700c. Tire itself fits on the rim. Has a low spot though where the bead doesn't seem to meet up with the edge of the braking surface. Doesn't rub too bad, just a little 'nic'.
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: Springfield, IL
Bikes: Trek Allant 9.9s
It's a Nishiki Olympic. I think it's an '88. I don't know if it's the original rims, bought it from someone. He may have replaced teh rims. It's a freewheel setup. The rims were tireless when I bought it. Bought it for 40 btw... probably got screwed.
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: Springfield, IL
Bikes: Trek Allant 9.9s
#7
Really Old Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,687
Likes: 1,928
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3
A 27x1" tire would be SLIGHTLY bigger than a 700x25c.
Most 27" tired bikes used a larger tire then 27x1".
27" rim = 630 MM
700c rim - 622 MM
1" = 25.4 MM
25MM = 25MM
Is the rear axle seated fully in the drop outs?
Most 27" tired bikes used a larger tire then 27x1".
27" rim = 630 MM
700c rim - 622 MM
1" = 25.4 MM
25MM = 25MM
Is the rear axle seated fully in the drop outs?
#9
If your doing a 700c conversion from 27", you should have a huge gap and need long reach brake calipers or to file your calipers down to move the brake pads further down. If you fit a 700c tire on the rim, it's 700c. My guess is that your bike doesn't take 27" or 700c wheels.
Maybe it's 26" or 650?
What size is on the front? Is the fork original?
Maybe it's 26" or 650?
What size is on the front? Is the fork original?
Last edited by ScottNotBombs; 02-18-12 at 06:38 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
There are 25 mm tires and there are 25 mm tires and some are a lot bigger than others despite the sidewall markings. I've seen tires marked 700-25 that were smaller than 700-23's and others that were as large as 700-28's. If you have a true or oversize 700-25 on a frame built around 700-23 or even 700-20 tires, that may explain the mis-fit.
#12
Guest

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,768
Likes: 6
From: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
There aren't too many bikes 'designed around' 20mm tires. Modern road bikes tend to have extremely tight clearance - certainly tighter than any Nishiki Olympic from the 80s - and you'd have to search pretty hard to find a 25mm tire that would not fit on most. 28mm tires are a different story.
That is almost definitely a frame designed around 650c or b wheels. Perhaps the previous owner swapped to 700c and used 20mm tires.
That is almost definitely a frame designed around 650c or b wheels. Perhaps the previous owner swapped to 700c and used 20mm tires.
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: Springfield, IL
Bikes: Trek Allant 9.9s
There aren't too many bikes 'designed around' 20mm tires. Modern road bikes tend to have extremely tight clearance - certainly tighter than any Nishiki Olympic from the 80s - and you'd have to search pretty hard to find a 25mm tire that would not fit on most. 28mm tires are a different story.
That is almost definitely a frame designed around 650c or b wheels. Perhaps the previous owner swapped to 700c and used 20mm tires.
That is almost definitely a frame designed around 650c or b wheels. Perhaps the previous owner swapped to 700c and used 20mm tires.
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: Springfield, IL
Bikes: Trek Allant 9.9s
If your doing a 700c conversion from 27", you should have a huge gap and need long reach brake calipers or to file your calipers down to move the brake pads further down. If you fit a 700c tire on the rim, it's 700c. My guess is that your bike doesn't take 27" or 700c wheels.
Maybe it's 26" or 650?
What size is on the front? Is the fork original?
Maybe it's 26" or 650?
What size is on the front? Is the fork original?
#15
Guest

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,768
Likes: 6
From: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
If the rubino tires are labelled as a 23mm tire then I bet they would fit. You don't need much more room.
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 2
From: Springfield, IL
Bikes: Trek Allant 9.9s
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
650C tires and ultra-skinny tires (down to 19 mm) were popular on triathlon-inspired road bikes in the late '80s or so. However, pictures of other Olympics (I used the Google) from the mid-'80s show 700C tires with moderate brake clearance. I couldn't find anything about 650B Olympics from that era (although that's still the best explanation we have).
One very unlikely possibility is that the bike was built around 700C wheels and the previous owner replaced them with 27" wheels, and you had the arm strength to wrestle the slightly too small tires onto the old rims. (The difficulty of getting the tires on is what makes this almost impossible.)
How's the clearance between the front tire and the front brake/fork crown, and between the rear tire and the chainstays? Any chance you could post a few more pictures?
EDIT: Sounds like you do have plenty of room at the front. This all sounds weird!
One very unlikely possibility is that the bike was built around 700C wheels and the previous owner replaced them with 27" wheels, and you had the arm strength to wrestle the slightly too small tires onto the old rims. (The difficulty of getting the tires on is what makes this almost impossible.)
How's the clearance between the front tire and the front brake/fork crown, and between the rear tire and the chainstays? Any chance you could post a few more pictures?
EDIT: Sounds like you do have plenty of room at the front. This all sounds weird!
Last edited by dave35; 02-18-12 at 08:27 PM. Reason: people posted useful info before I clicked 'submit'
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
those are probably "Araya 7000" rims, not avaya.
As far as I can tell, 7000 probably means 700c, not 27"
As far as I can tell, 7000 probably means 700c, not 27"
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 4
From: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
my latest bike purchase, i am sure, will not permit a 25mm tire. 23mm is tight already.
i'm not too surprised that an decent '88 road bike doesn't have clearance for a 25mm tire. i think it was the zenith of OE skinny tires. IIRC one could stroll down the row of new bikes at the LBS and group them pricewise by the width of the tires.
and as someone already mentioned, maybe you can just mount the rear axle in those short horizontal dropouts a little toward the opening to give you a bit more room and get that 25mm tire in there.
i'm not too surprised that an decent '88 road bike doesn't have clearance for a 25mm tire. i think it was the zenith of OE skinny tires. IIRC one could stroll down the row of new bikes at the LBS and group them pricewise by the width of the tires.
and as someone already mentioned, maybe you can just mount the rear axle in those short horizontal dropouts a little toward the opening to give you a bit more room and get that 25mm tire in there.
Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 02-18-12 at 10:32 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
If the bike was intended for 650c wheels, the brake reach would have to be a lot longer than for 700c wheels as the radial difference is 25.5 mm. So if any common reach (either long or short) brakes line up with the current 700c wheels, that almost certain what it was made for.
The probability of it being intended for 650b wheels is remote. That size was obsolete for many decades and only made it's niche reappearance a few years ago. No major maker I know of builds for this size and certainly didn't when this bike was made.
The probability of it being intended for 650b wheels is remote. That size was obsolete for many decades and only made it's niche reappearance a few years ago. No major maker I know of builds for this size and certainly didn't when this bike was made.
#22
Guest

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,768
Likes: 6
From: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
I found this 1987 Nishiki catalogue scan and (almost at the bottom where the details specs for each bike are) you can see the original tire size on the 'Olympic 12' was 700X25C...
I originally figured the bike originally had 650 c wheels, which used to be semi-common on small framed road bikes. But the swap to 700C would put the braking surface 25.5mm higher, which means that if it now works with 39-47mm (standard 'short reach' brakes), it would have had to have used brakes that could reach 65mm or more - which are not commonly spec'ed on many bikes. So that seems unlikely.
I originally figured the bike originally had 650 c wheels, which used to be semi-common on small framed road bikes. But the swap to 700C would put the braking surface 25.5mm higher, which means that if it now works with 39-47mm (standard 'short reach' brakes), it would have had to have used brakes that could reach 65mm or more - which are not commonly spec'ed on many bikes. So that seems unlikely.
#23
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
The "C" on those Araya labels looks an awful lot like another "0". Any chance you got a 700x28 tire by accident? Continentals are known for being a little too small, not too big.
- Scott
- Scott
#24
my latest bike purchase, i am sure, will not permit a 25mm tire. 23mm is tight already.
i'm not too surprised that an decent '88 road bike doesn't have clearance for a 25mm tire. i think it was the zenith of OE skinny tires. IIRC one could stroll down the row of new bikes at the LBS and group them pricewise by the width of the tires.
and as someone already mentioned, maybe you can just mount the rear axle in those short horizontal dropouts a little toward the opening to give you a bit more room and get that 25mm tire in there.
i'm not too surprised that an decent '88 road bike doesn't have clearance for a 25mm tire. i think it was the zenith of OE skinny tires. IIRC one could stroll down the row of new bikes at the LBS and group them pricewise by the width of the tires.
and as someone already mentioned, maybe you can just mount the rear axle in those short horizontal dropouts a little toward the opening to give you a bit more room and get that 25mm tire in there.
My 1989 Trek 1500 came stock with 20mm tires. The '89 catalog states that the 5000 came with 18mm tires! Now the 'standard' has settled on a slightly more reasonable 23mm size.
I'm not surprised a 1988 road bike would not fit 25mm tires. IIRC the Gatorskins run true to their size, so maybe they are a little fatter than other tires labeled 25mm that really aren't. It's not the brakes, it's not the rim, it's the design of the frame.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 4
If a 700C cant fin in there you have 3 options.
1 the frame is for 650C wheels or 26.
2 the rear brake bridge was modified but doesnt looks like it was, no idea if what u have there is a nishiki anyways.
3 You did not mention anything about the fork so i will assume the fork works fine.
Between the 3 my fav is number 1.
Sure a 700x23 will fit. The rims are 700C or you would not have been able to put the tires on the rim.
My theory, you have a 650 frame in there, the fork might not be the original either.
1 the frame is for 650C wheels or 26.
2 the rear brake bridge was modified but doesnt looks like it was, no idea if what u have there is a nishiki anyways.
3 You did not mention anything about the fork so i will assume the fork works fine.
Between the 3 my fav is number 1.
Sure a 700x23 will fit. The rims are 700C or you would not have been able to put the tires on the rim.
My theory, you have a 650 frame in there, the fork might not be the original either.



