Can anyone comprehensively explain the Joe Friel triangle to me?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,317
Bikes: Type of horse.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Can anyone comprehensively explain the Joe Friel triangle to me?
I've read the training bible's explanation of this multiple times, but have never been able to grasp the connection between 1) these words and race/training situation and 2) these words and some physiological metric.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From what I recall, he uses the triangle to illustrate how the training activities (corners of the triangle) drive the results (lines of the triangle). For example, Friel would say it takes the combination of speed and strength work to drive better sprinting ability (let's say the metric is 10 second power). That said, I'm not sure I understand (or completely agree with) aerobic endurance + speed work = anaerobic endurance. It seems like it's saying if I do huge base miles and speed work, I'll have great 3 minute power? That doesn't seem right. It's been a while since I've read the book, I'm probably way off base on the entire thing.
#5
impressive member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: fort collins
Posts: 2,706
Bikes: c'dale supersix, jamis trilogy, spec. tricross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
im at work too but from memory isnt the primary triangle speed/skills, endurance, and strength?
and then the secondary triangle where each of those intersect:
speed and strength = power
strength and endurance = muscular endurance (related to climbing and TT in particular)
endurance and speed = sprint endurance (holding high cadence sprint)
the advanced triangle isnt really scientific, just a way of thinking about the relationships between the basic components.
the basic triangle makes a lot of sense as a way to identify and develop your limiters.
and then the secondary triangle where each of those intersect:
speed and strength = power
strength and endurance = muscular endurance (related to climbing and TT in particular)
endurance and speed = sprint endurance (holding high cadence sprint)
the advanced triangle isnt really scientific, just a way of thinking about the relationships between the basic components.
the basic triangle makes a lot of sense as a way to identify and develop your limiters.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,317
Bikes: Type of horse.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
im at work too but from memory isnt the primary triangle speed/skills, endurance, and strength?
and then the secondary triangle where each of those intersect:
speed and strength = power
strength and endurance = muscular endurance (related to climbing and TT in particular)
endurance and speed = sprint endurance (holding high cadence sprint)
the advanced triangle isnt really scientific, just a way of thinking about the relationships between the basic components.
the basic triangle makes a lot of sense as a way to identify and develop your limiters.
and then the secondary triangle where each of those intersect:
speed and strength = power
strength and endurance = muscular endurance (related to climbing and TT in particular)
endurance and speed = sprint endurance (holding high cadence sprint)
the advanced triangle isnt really scientific, just a way of thinking about the relationships between the basic components.
the basic triangle makes a lot of sense as a way to identify and develop your limiters.
Usually I think of myself as a reasonably smart guy, but Friel's concepts have been continuously testing that theory.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,317
Bikes: Type of horse.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I like that and will study it, but the missing link is where training contributes. I believe that's the importance of Friel's triangle, that it tells you more about which drills to do - though I might be wrong.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
And with the diagram, I think the intent is the corners are kind of basic, non-specific training modes; racing happens in area in the middle of the triangle, with most race efforts grouped in a circle in the center that touches the three sides. In the off-season, you work at the corners, and you move your efforts towards the center and become more specific as you progress to and through the race season.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#12
Senior Member
It makes no sense to me. I can't get past even the basic definitions. For instance: "Speed". Speed of what? It can't be riding speed. I'll assume it's leg speed i.e. cadence - but that's why we have gears, to make sure no matter what velocity we want to ride the bike we can stay in a very narrow range of cadences. So how is it that better "speed" increases any performance on the bike - exception to track racing.
Usually I think of myself as a reasonably smart guy, but Friel's concepts have been continuously testing that theory.
Usually I think of myself as a reasonably smart guy, but Friel's concepts have been continuously testing that theory.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,317
Bikes: Type of horse.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Mr. Madison, what you've just said ... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
#14
SkinnyStrong
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin, Tejas
Posts: 1,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The "Speed Skills" corner of the triangle confused me too, when I first read it. It doesn't quite fit.
But basically, what he was getting at with the triangle, is that there are basic abilities and advanced abilities, and the advanced abilities are dependent on the basic ones.
For example, pedaling for a long time is endurance, pounding a big gear is force. You need to work on both of those independently before you start to work on pounding a big gear for a long time, which is muscular endurance.
Anaerobic endurance, to me, would seem to be a combination of all three corners.
But basically, what he was getting at with the triangle, is that there are basic abilities and advanced abilities, and the advanced abilities are dependent on the basic ones.
For example, pedaling for a long time is endurance, pounding a big gear is force. You need to work on both of those independently before you start to work on pounding a big gear for a long time, which is muscular endurance.
Anaerobic endurance, to me, would seem to be a combination of all three corners.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,317
Bikes: Type of horse.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This is a start. So endurance = long easy miles. force = standing starts/low cadence climbs? Then what does "muscular endurance" get you in a race? repeatability? Like sprinting out of a crit corner 100x/hr without muscle contraction force declining over the repeats? This would be irrelevant to aerobic/anaerobic systems IMO. would it not?
#16
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
This is a start. So endurance = long easy miles. force = standing starts/low cadence climbs? Then what does "muscular endurance" get you in a race? repeatability? Like sprinting out of a crit corner 100x/hr without muscle contraction force declining over the repeats? This would be irrelevant to aerobic/anaerobic systems IMO. would it not?
#17
fuggitivo solitario
why you guys spend so much time to delve into some mnemonic? That chart is intrinsically flawed at representing exercise physiology the same way lewis dot structures is flawed at representing molecules (actually, the former is even more flawed) as they aren't detailed enough.
that said, aerobic endurance is the capability to generate power by aerobic means, which means lots of oxidative glycolytic and lipolytic enzymes. Significant recruitment of fast twitch muscle fibers occur at threshold to generate higher force, but there will be lactate produced, and your muscles will have to deal with the clearance of them (which, btw, doesn't need to go to the Cori cycle). Muscular endurance is ability to generate high power for extended period of time (think time trials & FTP) all the while that your muscles are operating further away from ideal physiological conditions, which is basically putting out power when fatigued.
Sprinting 100x out of corners have everything to do with aerobic & anaerobic. Whatever the aerobic can't cover has to be covered by anaerobic during the burst. So higher aerobic capacity means less reliance on anaerobic system for power generation. Furthermore, muscle lactate generated anaerobically can be aerobically cleared. Anaerobic work capacity is limited and only recharges when there's not a lot of demand.
If you really want to learn about this, read textbooks on exercise physiology and the two articles below. Reading Friel for exercise physiology makes as much sense as asking exercise physiologist for race strategy.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15131240
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22382171
that said, aerobic endurance is the capability to generate power by aerobic means, which means lots of oxidative glycolytic and lipolytic enzymes. Significant recruitment of fast twitch muscle fibers occur at threshold to generate higher force, but there will be lactate produced, and your muscles will have to deal with the clearance of them (which, btw, doesn't need to go to the Cori cycle). Muscular endurance is ability to generate high power for extended period of time (think time trials & FTP) all the while that your muscles are operating further away from ideal physiological conditions, which is basically putting out power when fatigued.
Sprinting 100x out of corners have everything to do with aerobic & anaerobic. Whatever the aerobic can't cover has to be covered by anaerobic during the burst. So higher aerobic capacity means less reliance on anaerobic system for power generation. Furthermore, muscle lactate generated anaerobically can be aerobically cleared. Anaerobic work capacity is limited and only recharges when there's not a lot of demand.
If you really want to learn about this, read textbooks on exercise physiology and the two articles below. Reading Friel for exercise physiology makes as much sense as asking exercise physiologist for race strategy.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15131240
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22382171
#18
soon to be gsteinc...
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nayr497's BFF
Posts: 8,564
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#19
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
I guess a better question is, how is it supposed to be used?
Also, it seems to leave out the type of bar tape you have.
#20
Senior Member
Not a mnemonic. It's a model. Albeit, oversimplified, maybe.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#21
Senior Member
Mr. Madison, what you've just said ... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Or, rather, you could instead constructively address my statements' flaws and point out its failings.
In the end, he who spins the biggest gear fastest, wins. Outside of tactics, tell me how this is wrong.
#22
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
And unless that's what you're making reference to, then the equation is meaningless.
#23
Senior Member
Talking about the utility of leg speed: training leg speed will make your pedaling motion smoother by improving your neuromuscular control, even if you never spin at 120+rpm in a race.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#24
Senior Member
While my statement was not addressing the OP, I was trying to address this sub-topic the OP brought up:
It makes no sense to me. I can't get past even the basic definitions. For instance: "Speed". Speed of what? It can't be riding speed. I'll assume it's leg speed i.e. cadence - but that's why we have gears, to make sure no matter what velocity we want to ride the bike we can stay in a very narrow range of cadences. So how is it that better "speed" increases any performance on the bike - exception to track racing.
Usually I think of myself as a reasonably smart guy, but Friel's concepts have been continuously testing that theory.
Usually I think of myself as a reasonably smart guy, but Friel's concepts have been continuously testing that theory.