What would you ask an LAB staff person at a conference?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
What would you ask an LAB staff person at a conference?
I am attending a conference soon where someone on staff of LAB will be speaking. I don't know if there will be time for Q&A or not.
If you had this chance, what question would you ask the LAB staff member?
Thanks!
If you had this chance, what question would you ask the LAB staff member?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your question is so open-ended, you are not going to get a response. How about "what are you doing to promote cycling in an urban area?" Or maybe, "If I'm supposed to share the lane with motorists, why won't they share it with me?". How about "why do cars hate me?", or "Please provide a good reason for lane-sharing". The rest is up to you...
#3
-=Barry=-
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My main gripe is why doesn't the Bicycle Friendly State Program ranking reflect how well a given state is in accommodating cyclists?
There are lots of answers (justifications) on why that is but I personally think they are all wrong. The short version is LAB's criteria only measures (inaccurately I might add) the POTENTIAL for a state to achieve bicycle friendless not to what degree the state is ACTUALLY committing to its policies (and other areas as well.) Or i.e. LAB does NOT look at how easy it is for a state to overlook its own bike friendly policies.
My main suggestion is to get rid of the yes and no questions and replace them with a scale from 1 to 10.
There are lots of answers (justifications) on why that is but I personally think they are all wrong. The short version is LAB's criteria only measures (inaccurately I might add) the POTENTIAL for a state to achieve bicycle friendless not to what degree the state is ACTUALLY committing to its policies (and other areas as well.) Or i.e. LAB does NOT look at how easy it is for a state to overlook its own bike friendly policies.
My main suggestion is to get rid of the yes and no questions and replace them with a scale from 1 to 10.
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
I am thinking of something along the lines of "is there any evidence that bike lanes with green paint or plastic pole separators actually increase safety?"
#5
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
you should be able to answer that yourself.
Physical separation with barriers and colored paint countermeasures reduce traffic conflicts.
Physical separation with barriers and colored paint countermeasures reduce traffic conflicts.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The stats I know of (but can't provide at the moment as my computer is just recovering from a major virus attack) suggest that the number of conflicts (registered as minor accidents) may go up, but the death rate goes down.
#9
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
meh.
2012 NIH journal - New York City bikelanes do not lead to greater conflicts
-that study wasn't even adjusted for the increasing ridership in NYC that has tripled in the last decade as well)
and this one, a much larger assay,
a 2009 meta analysis of 23 bicycle infrastructure studies
both provide compelling suggestions, if not cut and dried, double blind polar-bonded correlation that
"Evidence is beginning to accumulate that purpose-built bicycle-specific facilities reduce crashes and injuries among cyclists."
I'm sure the flat-earth society of bicycling drivers won't be able to accept facilities drive bicyclist safety, but their loss. If a person wants to look like a rube at a bicycling conference, all they have to do is ask if separated class bike facilities or painted pavement enhancements improve rider safety.
Last edited by Bekologist; 10-12-12 at 05:16 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by John Forester
Bek's claim is quantitative, referring to numbers of conflicts. OK Bek. Prove your claim by reference to traffic statistics.
Bek, you have not answered the challenge to your claim that "Physical separation with barriers and colored paint countermeasures reduce traffic conflicts." Neither of the sources which you provide contains any data on such conflicts, let alone comparing them with other facilities. You made this claim. Therefore you should provide the supporting evidence.
Bek's claim is quantitative, referring to numbers of conflicts. OK Bek. Prove your claim by reference to traffic statistics.
meh.
2012 NIH journal - New York City bikelanes do not lead to greater conflicts
-that study wasn't even adjusted for the increasing ridership in NYC that has tripled in the last decade as well)
and this one, a much larger assay,
a 2009 meta analysis of 23 bicycle infrastructure studies
both provide compelling suggestions, if not cut and dried, double blind polar-bonded correlation that
"Evidence is beginning to accumulate that purpose-built bicycle-specific facilities reduce crashes and injuries among cyclists."
I'm sure the flat-earth society of bicycling drivers won't be able to accept facilities drive bicyclist safety, but their loss. If a person wants to look like a rube at a bicycling conference, all they have to do is ask if separated class bike facilities or painted pavement enhancements improve rider safety.
2012 NIH journal - New York City bikelanes do not lead to greater conflicts
-that study wasn't even adjusted for the increasing ridership in NYC that has tripled in the last decade as well)
and this one, a much larger assay,
a 2009 meta analysis of 23 bicycle infrastructure studies
both provide compelling suggestions, if not cut and dried, double blind polar-bonded correlation that
"Evidence is beginning to accumulate that purpose-built bicycle-specific facilities reduce crashes and injuries among cyclists."
I'm sure the flat-earth society of bicycling drivers won't be able to accept facilities drive bicyclist safety, but their loss. If a person wants to look like a rube at a bicycling conference, all they have to do is ask if separated class bike facilities or painted pavement enhancements improve rider safety.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bek, you have not answered the challenge to your claim that "Physical separation with barriers and colored paint countermeasures reduce traffic conflicts." Neither of the sources which you provide contains any data on such conflicts, let alone comparing them with other facilities. You made this claim. Therefore you should provide the supporting evidence.
This is not so.
1: There is no count of the number of conflicts encountered. Nor, for that matter, any definition of conflict.
2: There has never been any analysis or demonstration of how it is, what is the mechanism, by which these facilities either reduce conflicts or reduce car-bike collisions.
3: There has never been a demonstration that changes in the general rate of car-bike collisions have been largely attributable to the presence of these facilities.
Only for those who have the presupposing superstition that these facilities have these results does the evidence seem reasonable.
1: There is no count of the number of conflicts encountered. Nor, for that matter, any definition of conflict.
2: There has never been any analysis or demonstration of how it is, what is the mechanism, by which these facilities either reduce conflicts or reduce car-bike collisions.
3: There has never been a demonstration that changes in the general rate of car-bike collisions have been largely attributable to the presence of these facilities.
Only for those who have the presupposing superstition that these facilities have these results does the evidence seem reasonable.
#13
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
the evidence is all from all over the place
about green emphasis zones
Green lanes increase ridership, and safety. Separated infrastructure has long been shown to be safer than roadway cycling.
.......but to a person dedicated to marginalizing progress towards normalizing the bicycle as everyday transport, of course there's aspersions to be cast.
about green emphasis zones
Green lanes increase ridership, and safety. Separated infrastructure has long been shown to be safer than roadway cycling.
.......but to a person dedicated to marginalizing progress towards normalizing the bicycle as everyday transport, of course there's aspersions to be cast.
Last edited by Bekologist; 10-12-12 at 05:36 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the evidence is all from all over the place
about green emphasis zones
Green lanes increase ridership, and safety. Separated infrastructure has long been shown to be safer than roadway cycling.
.......but to a person dedicated to marginalizing progress towards normalizing the bicycle as everyday transport, of course there's aspersions to be cast.
about green emphasis zones
Green lanes increase ridership, and safety. Separated infrastructure has long been shown to be safer than roadway cycling.
.......but to a person dedicated to marginalizing progress towards normalizing the bicycle as everyday transport, of course there's aspersions to be cast.
You repeat the claim that "separated infrastructure" has long been shown to be safer than roadway cycling. What studies do you offer to support your claim, Bek?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832
Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is not so.
1: There is no count of the number of conflicts encountered. Nor, for that matter, any definition of conflict.
2: There has never been any analysis or demonstration of how it is, what is the mechanism, by which these facilities either reduce conflicts or reduce car-bike collisions.
3: There has never been a demonstration that changes in the general rate of car-bike collisions have been largely attributable to the presence of these facilities.
Only for those who have the presupposing superstition that these facilities have these results does the evidence seem reasonable.
1: There is no count of the number of conflicts encountered. Nor, for that matter, any definition of conflict.
2: There has never been any analysis or demonstration of how it is, what is the mechanism, by which these facilities either reduce conflicts or reduce car-bike collisions.
3: There has never been a demonstration that changes in the general rate of car-bike collisions have been largely attributable to the presence of these facilities.
Only for those who have the presupposing superstition that these facilities have these results does the evidence seem reasonable.
I am, of course, absolutely unable to answer back in any way. I might start pointing out your total failure to address the issue I bring up and your formalistic ramblings about things that are irrelevant to my post, but that wouldn't cover even a small fraction of the mass of idiocy contained in your text, so it's futile to even start.
Thoroughly ******.
Last edited by hagen2456; 10-12-12 at 06:56 PM.
#16
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I'm not sure why the OP doesn't think paint emphasis, or barrier separated lanes, don't make cycling safer.
I think it's long been established paint and emphasis zones enhance bicyclist safety. Studied in test cities, proven effective, and allowed by the federal highway administration.
is this comedy hour at the flat earth club? people screaming and yelling about the lack of proof about designs allowed by the federal highway administration? These guys don't move lightly in adding design enhancements for bicyclists.
FHWA press release
I like the way San Francisco uses barrier separation along Market Street.... i think there's continued improvements there.
it's funny to see bicyclists complaining these types of enhancements don't improve cyclist safety...
hilarious! "the barriers and the green paint, the effects aren't proven".....
I think a good question to ask a LAB representative is
"What specifically is the LAB doing in my city to create more bicyclist friendly conditions?
"Are there any programs being introduced by the LAB that provide a script of local level asks that can be taken to city or county government agencies to increase viability of bicycling here?"
I think it's long been established paint and emphasis zones enhance bicyclist safety. Studied in test cities, proven effective, and allowed by the federal highway administration.
is this comedy hour at the flat earth club? people screaming and yelling about the lack of proof about designs allowed by the federal highway administration? These guys don't move lightly in adding design enhancements for bicyclists.
Originally Posted by Federal Highway Administration 2011
The FHWA has issued an Interim Approval for the use of green coloring in bike lanes. Citing multiple experiments that demonstrated positive operational effects for both bicycle riders and other road users, with no notable negative effects, this approval allows states to apply for approval to use coloring in bike lanes and bike lane extension, and States may request approval for all jurisdictions in that State. This Interim Approval does not make the use of green-colored pavement mandatory.
I like the way San Francisco uses barrier separation along Market Street.... i think there's continued improvements there.
it's funny to see bicyclists complaining these types of enhancements don't improve cyclist safety...
hilarious! "the barriers and the green paint, the effects aren't proven".....
I think a good question to ask a LAB representative is
"What specifically is the LAB doing in my city to create more bicyclist friendly conditions?
"Are there any programs being introduced by the LAB that provide a script of local level asks that can be taken to city or county government agencies to increase viability of bicycling here?"
Last edited by Bekologist; 10-12-12 at 07:17 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not sure why the OP doesn't think paint emphasis, or barrier separated lanes, don't make cycling safer.
I think it's long been established paint and emphasis zones enhance bicyclist safety. Studied in test cities, proven effective, and allowed by the federal highway administration.
is this comedy hour at the flat earth club? people screaming and yelling about the lack of proof about designs allowed by the federal highway administration? These guys don't move lightly in adding design enhancements for bicyclists.
FHWA press release
I like the way San Francisco uses barrier separation along Market Street.... i think there's continued improvements there.
it's funny to see bicyclists complaining these types of enhancements don't improve cyclist safety...
hilarious! "the barriers and the green paint, the effects aren't proven".....
I think a good question to ask a LAB representative is
"What specifically is the LAB doing in my city to create more bicyclist friendly conditions?
"Are there any programs being introduced by the LAB that provide a script of local level asks that can be taken to city or county government agencies to increase viability of bicycling here?"
I think it's long been established paint and emphasis zones enhance bicyclist safety. Studied in test cities, proven effective, and allowed by the federal highway administration.
is this comedy hour at the flat earth club? people screaming and yelling about the lack of proof about designs allowed by the federal highway administration? These guys don't move lightly in adding design enhancements for bicyclists.
FHWA press release
I like the way San Francisco uses barrier separation along Market Street.... i think there's continued improvements there.
it's funny to see bicyclists complaining these types of enhancements don't improve cyclist safety...
hilarious! "the barriers and the green paint, the effects aren't proven".....
I think a good question to ask a LAB representative is
"What specifically is the LAB doing in my city to create more bicyclist friendly conditions?
"Are there any programs being introduced by the LAB that provide a script of local level asks that can be taken to city or county government agencies to increase viability of bicycling here?"
#18
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Wait, the federal highway administration's reliance on several studies on green paint is propoganda because they summarized countermeasures as 'positive operational effects'? the positive operational effects are detailed in each study, John. Playing first chair in the obtuse section again, wot?
it's more this, FIFY
I'd imagine if the original poster wants to troll for laughs she could ask at the conference, "I've heard on the internet that green lanes and barrier separation countermeasures are not safety driven, but are nothing more than a propaganda campaign- any comments?"
it's more this, FIFY
I'd imagine if the original poster wants to troll for laughs she could ask at the conference, "I've heard on the internet that green lanes and barrier separation countermeasures are not safety driven, but are nothing more than a propaganda campaign- any comments?"
Last edited by Bekologist; 10-13-12 at 08:01 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wait, the federal highway administration's reliance on several studies on green paint is propoganda because they summarized countermeasures as 'positive operational effects'? the positive operational effects are detailed in each study, John. Playing first chair in the obtuse section again, wot?
it's more this, FIFY
I'd imagine if the original poster wants to troll for laughs she could ask at the conference, "I've heard on the internet that green lanes and barrier separation countermeasures are not safety driven, but are nothing more than a propaganda campaign- any comments?"
it's more this, FIFY
I'd imagine if the original poster wants to troll for laughs she could ask at the conference, "I've heard on the internet that green lanes and barrier separation countermeasures are not safety driven, but are nothing more than a propaganda campaign- any comments?"
#20
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
We are presented with what are supposed to be serious traffic-engineering studies, for which the only conclusion is that "positive operational effects" were observed. That is, nothing was observed that could be described and quantified. Science since the time of Galileo has demanded accurate descriptions and quantitative measurements; what we get for bikeway studies ain't science, but no more than propaganda by advocates of suspect scientific reputation.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Please be specific. What were the roadway modifications studied in this act of 1956, and in what way did these lack scientific substantiation?
#22
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Like i said earlier,
if the original poster was interested in trolling for laughs she could ask at the conference, "I've heard on the internet that green lanes and barrier separation countermeasures are not safety driven, but are nothing more than a propaganda campaign- any comments?"
if the original poster was interested in trolling for laughs she could ask at the conference, "I've heard on the internet that green lanes and barrier separation countermeasures are not safety driven, but are nothing more than a propaganda campaign- any comments?"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Human Car
Advocacy & Safety
37
06-15-11 02:25 PM