Cranksets - Rotor 3d vs. Cannondale SiSL vs. Ultegra
#1
Cycliste sérieux
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 466
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cranksets - Rotor 3d vs. Cannondale SiSL vs. Ultegra
Rotor 3d vs. Cannondale SiSL vs. Ultegra 6700
Which would you choose and why? Thanks for your opinions.
Which would you choose and why? Thanks for your opinions.
#2
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I chose the Rotor, primarily for Power2Max compatibility (which I haven't gotten to yet, but that's beside the point). I also have Q-rings on it, and think it's the most attractive of the options.
#4
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
See, I liked the original SiSL, but not the new one.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Does the Rotor crank cost like 3x as much as the Ultegra one?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 780
Bikes: Argon18 Gallium 2016, Trek Emonda SL6 Pro 2018, Salsa Beargrease
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Out of these I'd pick the hollowgram SISL2
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 1,155
Bikes: Helix, HonkyTonk, NailTrail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
6700 or Rotor due to forged construction for stiffness. 6700 is likely heavier by some single digit percentage. Dunno about price, I go with whichever cheaper. Or if I wanted to match drivetrain, I'd go 6700.
Dunno about Cannondale. Some SRAM chainrings weren't so stiff and Rotor was a common easy upgrade.
Dunno about Cannondale. Some SRAM chainrings weren't so stiff and Rotor was a common easy upgrade.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
Holmes, that's like asking Caddy, F-150, or a Tercel....there is a big cost divide
#10
Cycliste sérieux
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 466
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have the Ultegra now, but getting the itch to change up the bike and am considering 3d or SiSl. Cost is not the issue. Looking for opinions excluding the cost factor.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bangkok: hottest average temperature :(
Posts: 628
Bikes: *1998 GT Forte Ti 700c, Totem KDS-D 26" fatbike, BirdyGT 18", Brompton M2LX 16"
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I might be wrong but weren't the old SiSL cranks claiming to be the lightest and stiffest cranks?
So one would guess they only got better.
I would guess the Shimano shifts best, they have the most experience there.
If I won the lottery, SiSL2.
So one would guess they only got better.
I would guess the Shimano shifts best, they have the most experience there.
If I won the lottery, SiSL2.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If cost is not an issue, buy the one that you think looks the best. You always hear people talking about "stiffness" but my bet is that most people won't even be able to tell the difference between the three you listed. I personally have the rotor 3d w/ Q rings.... they look super trick on the bike.
#13
Senior Member
Spindle size is different so all may not fir on your bike. Shimano has a 68mm dia spindle, Cannondale is BB30, Rotor I think makes both. Cannondale won't fit in any frame that is set up for threaded BBs/press fit for Shimano.
#14
Falls Downalot
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 3,103
Bikes: Now I Got Two
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
OP, what is the point of such a question, phrased as "which one would you pick"? I bet you have a preference already and are hoping to get validation for it. That is very unlikely. Don't you know you will get a distribution of answers that will make a decision impossible? On the 41 there are proponents for every reasonable choice. Better to say that you are leaning toward XYZ and want to know the pros and cons.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 279
Bikes: Lynskey Helix OS and R330, Parlee Z1, Anderson 953 Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have to admit that I got the Cannondale SISL on my Helix OS for looks. After riding it for almost two years, I really fell in love with the no nonsense stiffness and lightness and the complete lack of problems with the PF30 shell.
When I was choosing components for my Parlee, I wavered back and forth between the old SISL + SRM and the new SISL2 Spiderring. But, since only the SISL2 Spiderring was described as being 11-speed compatible, I choose it plus eeBrakes to round off my DA9070 plus internal battery build.
I also have the SRAM Quarq on my Lynskey R330. And, although it is has a GXP BB, it is still stiff enough. Since it is the PM build, the crankset weight and appearance became secondary to functionality and stiffness. According to Fairwheelbike's latest crank review, the SRAM Red cranks are stiff enough.
Mark
When I was choosing components for my Parlee, I wavered back and forth between the old SISL + SRM and the new SISL2 Spiderring. But, since only the SISL2 Spiderring was described as being 11-speed compatible, I choose it plus eeBrakes to round off my DA9070 plus internal battery build.
I also have the SRAM Quarq on my Lynskey R330. And, although it is has a GXP BB, it is still stiff enough. Since it is the PM build, the crankset weight and appearance became secondary to functionality and stiffness. According to Fairwheelbike's latest crank review, the SRAM Red cranks are stiff enough.
Mark
#18
Cycliste sérieux
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 466
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I decided to stick with my Ultegra and just ride more. What I have works just fine. It's too easy to get sucked into spending $ on cool-looking bike stuff. I was trying to justify buying some eye candy for my bike, but in the end I couldn't make the justification. I'm sure I will eventually succumb to my OCD, but for now I'm content.
#19
Falls Downalot
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 3,103
Bikes: Now I Got Two
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, the cannondale SL crankset fits in the PF 30 bottom bracket on my Parlee, so I guess that is within the parameters you describe...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
karlmalone1
Road Cycling
23
03-06-11 01:05 PM