Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

92 Cannondale R600 or 2012 Scott s40 for my first road bike

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

92 Cannondale R600 or 2012 Scott s40 for my first road bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-13, 12:39 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
92 Cannondale R600 or 2012 Scott s40 for my first road bike

Thinking about buying this bike to get into road cycling

https://tampa.craigslist.org/pnl/bik/3863809258.html

Wondering if a 56cm would be a little big for me. I'm 5'10". I wear 30" inseam pants.

Is this a quality bike, good for getting into cycling? I've read that these are a bit stiff.

Or should I spend a little more on this Scott s40 that is only a year old?

https://tampa.craigslist.org/hil/bik/3809508543.html

Thanks!
travelintim is offline  
Old 06-13-13, 02:52 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
BruceHankins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Charles Town, WV
Posts: 348

Bikes: Shogun 400 ('83), Kuwahara Newport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Test ride both and see what's better. I think I would go with the specialized based on pictures, but it may not be that nice in person.
BruceHankins is offline  
Old 06-13-13, 06:15 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
THSdrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 662

Bikes: '12 CAAD10 3, '88 Raleigh Talon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd love to buy that Cannondale... I want a Cannondale with downtube shifters and that paint scheme is pretty sweet.

As stated, I'd test ride both. I'm 5'9" with an inseam of 32" (I believe) and I ride a size 54. I could ride a 56, but it just felt a tad big under me. I would've had to shorten the stem, and I didn't want to do that.
THSdrummer is offline  
Old 06-13-13, 11:19 AM
  #4  
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
56 is probably about right... the Cannondale is overpriced, IMO. Scott seems kind of high for a Sora bike, but it's 20 years newer -- think about that.
Phantoj is offline  
Old 06-13-13, 12:08 PM
  #5  
Tour De French Fries
 
Elduderino2412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,251

Bikes: 2010 Cervelo R3 SL & 2013 Airborne Goblin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
out of those two def the scott. 500 doesnt seem that high. Bike was probably around 800-900 new(not including tax).
Elduderino2412 is offline  
Old 06-13-13, 12:22 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
I vote the Scott, as long as it fits okay. If it's too big then skip it. Nothing's worse than a bike that's the wrong size.
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 06-13-13, 12:23 PM
  #7  
Hogosha Sekai
 
RaleighSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STS
Posts: 6,669

Bikes: Leader 725, Centurion Turbo, Scwhinn Peloton, Schwinn Premis, GT Tequesta, Bridgestone CB-2,72' Centurion Lemans, 72 Raleigh Competition

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 15 Posts
The CDales clean, but IMO just too much money for that particular bike.

If the Scott is really Ultregra everything cept the shifters, it's probably close to the right price but seems a little high to me.
RaleighSport is offline  
Old 06-14-13, 08:11 AM
  #8  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies. I took a couple of bikes out for test rides at shops in Tampa yesterday. A 52cm Trek, felt too small. Then a 54cm Giant which felt perfect. So I think 56cm might be a little big.

What do you guys think of this 1989 Raleigh?
https://tampa.craigslist.org/hil/bik/3851901607.html
travelintim is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raoul_duke2k
Road Cycling
18
02-18-13 03:51 PM
Pierrre
Road Cycling
2
10-12-12 05:58 AM
buckeyefan
Road Cycling
19
08-06-10 07:37 AM
Ragin Cajun
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
1
06-26-10 07:03 AM
nycbianchi
Road Cycling
13
04-21-10 12:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.