Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

Powermeters - Crankset type vs Powertap (hub)

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Powermeters - Crankset type vs Powertap (hub)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-13, 03:41 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
CanadianBiker32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,006

Bikes: Maxim, Rocky Mountain, Argon 18, Cervelo S2 Team

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Powermeters - Crankset type vs Powertap (hub)

I been looking at powermeters again. I noticed for a lower price one can get those power tap power meters that are in the rear hub.
Now how accurate are the power tap compared to the crankset types?
What problems in readings would i get getting a power tap over the crankset type?

What is more accurate etc?

Do the powermeters make any unusual noise? thanks
CanadianBiker32 is offline  
Old 07-21-13, 05:26 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 1,916

Bikes: Look 585

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Both the hub-based and crank based power meters are as accurate as you can get. I'm sure the specific products web site will provide the accuracy for their power meters.

In theory, the hub based power meter would be more accurate since they measure the power at the rear hub. Those that measure at the crank set don't consider the drive train losses. In practice, the real difference is probably inconsequential.

Power meters make no noises.

Power Tap pretty much owns the hub based market. SRM and Quarq are popular crank based power meters. Crank arm and pedal/cleat based systems have recently come to market but their reliability and accuracy have not been established.
bikepro is offline  
Old 07-22-13, 06:49 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by bikepro
...In theory, the hub based power meter would be more accurate since they measure the power at the rear hub. Those that measure at the crank set don't consider the drive train losses. In practice, the real difference is probably inconsequential...
I'd turn that around if the intent is to measure the power output of the rider. That said, I agree that the difference is inconsequential for the purposes power meters are general put to.
Looigi is offline  
Old 07-22-13, 12:54 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 1,916

Bikes: Look 585

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Looigi
I'd turn that around if the intent is to measure the power output of the rider. That said, I agree that the difference is inconsequential for the purposes power meters are general put to.
I was thinking in terms of power delivered to the rear wheel -- hairsplitting in any case.
bikepro is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colombo357
Road Cycling
6
05-25-18 08:09 PM
sdmc530
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
13
02-14-18 11:57 AM
rzhunemagu
Road Cycling
8
02-26-17 05:46 PM
ppg677
Classic & Vintage
2
07-01-15 05:44 PM
dykim90
Road Cycling
38
07-25-11 02:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.