Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

A step backwards in traffic signal automation

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

A step backwards in traffic signal automation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-14, 04:37 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,528

Bikes: 2009 Trek 520

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 130 Posts
A step backwards in traffic signal automation

The city I live in uses pole mounted microwave vehicle detectors on practically every signaled intersection, as harsh winters would destroy the in ground variety. Even on a bike they work like a charm, just move left into the driving lane as you approach the intersection and the light changes.

However over the past year I've been encountering more and more intersections where I never get detected. A traffic engineer got back to me to say that they started using "true-presence" sensors that can eliminate false positives caused by the pole bouncing in the wind. It would seem cyclists falls within the threshold of a false positive and are duly ignored.

It creates a bit of a dilemma, if I know the intersection I'm approaching will never go green should I even bother waiting at the red at all. Some of these detectors are at intersections with dedicated left-turn lanes so there isn't even a pedestrian button to press. The problem will only get worse as old model detectors are swapped out.
gecho is offline  
Old 08-03-14, 05:23 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times in 1,423 Posts
Since the engineer is talking to you (a rarity in itself) try to get him to consider seeking a balance between false positives and bicycle detection. It's possible that some fine tuning can work acceptably for all interests..

The answer might involve tuning and aiming to a standard "sweet spot" which bicycles can move into to be read. If that works, painting a marker on the pavement would be the next step.

If dialog and experimantation doesn't yield a solution, then it's a matter of speaking to the city council (or whoever's in charge) and seeing if they'll give bicycle needs some priority and build it into the plan.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 08-03-14, 05:58 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 139

Bikes: Trek Madone4.5, Fuji Newest, DaVinci Joint Venture, Pacific Dually, Kuota K Factor Thruster

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
My city does a pretty good job of adjusting for bicycles when I notify them of lights that won't trip. The few lights that still won't recognize me, I just go when the traffic allows.
jhazel is offline  
Old 08-03-14, 08:09 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Perhaps a tin foil helmet would do the job
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 08-03-14, 09:23 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,528

Bikes: 2009 Trek 520

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 130 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
Perhaps a tin foil helmet would do the job
It just might, need to google "how to increase radar signature".

edit: I gotta try and find one of these: https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdviso...adar-Reflector a 3" radius disc gives a 1 square meter radar signature, still kind of big.

Last edited by gecho; 08-03-14 at 09:34 PM.
gecho is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 07:45 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Doesn't help with your microwave sensors, but some of the newest traffic signals around here use cameras, which have worked reliably for me on my bike.

For a radar reflector on the front of a bike, you need the apex cut off a cube (corner plus three sides) facing forward. This would be like 1/8 of the westmarine reflector which is intended to be omnidirectional. Corner reflector - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The material needs to be conductive. Effectiveness depends on its size compared to the wavelength of the radar. For K and X bands, 5 cm along an edge should be adequate.
Looigi is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 09:01 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: antipodes
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
"True-presence" doesn't sound like a very meaningful term for an engineer to be using. Are they microwave based too or something different entirely? Either way its a failing on the behalf of the engineers/planners involved - bicycles are vehicles and they all need to catered for. Point out that failing to do so could encourage cyclists to run red lights - thats a safety issue. For the same reason I don't think suggestions as to how to make you own personal bike pick up the signal are very helpful - I mean they are helpful to you, but they don't help other riders much.
yugyug is offline  
Old 08-05-14, 10:05 PM
  #8  
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Locally, I don't get detected, either.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 08-06-14, 08:47 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by yugyug
"True-presence" doesn't sound like a very meaningful term for an engineer to be using. ...
Sounds like a term one might use when trying to respond to (or blow off) a lay inquiry.
Looigi is offline  
Old 08-06-14, 09:07 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,528

Bikes: 2009 Trek 520

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 130 Posts
Originally Posted by Looigi
Sounds like a term one might use when trying to respond to (or blow off) a lay inquiry.
I got search hits for that term in various patent applications, DOT documents and product literature, so it is probably an industry term to differentiate different types of sensors.
gecho is offline  
Old 08-06-14, 09:17 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 456

Bikes: Trek 4900, Cannondale Cx-4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
Perhaps a tin foil helmet would do the job
Does the foil go inside or outside the helmet?
Mvcrash is offline  
Old 08-06-14, 04:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,528

Bikes: 2009 Trek 520

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 130 Posts
Gave building my own reflector a try just for kicks. I figure unidirectional will be sufficient so I wouldn't need a sphere. Used a compass to draw a 3" radius circle on a piece of non-corrugated cardboard. Then carefully drew lines dividing the circle in 4 and cut out one quadrant. Prefolded it inwards, then applied foil HVAC tape.

I'll take it for a test ride tomorrow.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
reflector.jpg (92.5 KB, 12 views)
gecho is offline  
Old 08-08-14, 01:06 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,528

Bikes: 2009 Trek 520

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 155 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 130 Posts
First test inconclusive but promising. I did a tour of various problem intersections, but other vehicles were present at most of them even waiting a cycle or two to see if it would clear. But there was one intersection I've never been able to trigger, that gave me an arrow when no cars were present. I'm going to have to get out very early in the morning to make multiple approaches with and without the reflector to see if it has any effect.

I noticed the sensors are in two different types of configurations. Pole mounted on the opposite side of the intersection pointing toward the traffic lane. And pole mounted on the same side of the intersection pointed downward at the lane. A single direction reflector might not work on that second type.
gecho is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
asmac
Advocacy & Safety
4
09-01-13 03:43 PM
seafood
Advocacy & Safety
3
07-21-13 10:08 PM
Daves_Not_Here
Advocacy & Safety
65
09-12-12 02:15 PM
t595
Road Cycling
4
06-02-10 06:57 AM
Timber_8
Commuting
11
03-08-10 11:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.