Performance of single speed X fixed gear
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
2 Posts
Performance of single speed X fixed gear
sorry if this was asked before (could't find anything).
So, I just got one bike, fixed gear. Been using it for some time, and love the feel of a single gear. But, I also got a freewheel wich came with the bike, and it got me thinking...
There is any loss of performance in ss comparing to fg? Specially in hill climbing? 'm asking with rides like 80, 90 km, with 1000m or more of ascension (what I usually do on the weekends) in mind. I suppose fg would be more efficient in climbing (to me, it seens easier on hard climbs because of the moving cranks, wich make me suppose one do a bit less force to overcome the dead spots on pedal movement), but it never hurts to ask to people with way more mileage than me Using road shoes, if it changes anything.
so, can you guys feel a performance difference in the switch? I know I can just coast on the downhills and get a bit of refreshment for the next climb, so maybe I can climb fresher and overcome any advantages of FG?
thanks in advance
So, I just got one bike, fixed gear. Been using it for some time, and love the feel of a single gear. But, I also got a freewheel wich came with the bike, and it got me thinking...
There is any loss of performance in ss comparing to fg? Specially in hill climbing? 'm asking with rides like 80, 90 km, with 1000m or more of ascension (what I usually do on the weekends) in mind. I suppose fg would be more efficient in climbing (to me, it seens easier on hard climbs because of the moving cranks, wich make me suppose one do a bit less force to overcome the dead spots on pedal movement), but it never hurts to ask to people with way more mileage than me Using road shoes, if it changes anything.
so, can you guys feel a performance difference in the switch? I know I can just coast on the downhills and get a bit of refreshment for the next climb, so maybe I can climb fresher and overcome any advantages of FG?
thanks in advance
#2
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
431 Posts
The difference is insignificant. Either way you have to apply force to the pedals and keep your legs turning.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
Last edited by TejanoTrackie; 04-17-15 at 06:34 AM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
no. its simple physics. you are doing the same amount of work either way. The only difference in efficiency would be if the freewheel was less mechanically efficient than the cog, by say having more friction between it and the chain. Which it doesn't. and anything like that would be negligible and probably not measurable.
unless its powered by something other than you, a bike will never push you.
unless its powered by something other than you, a bike will never push you.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
This is pretty much the answer to about 95% of the questions asked anywhere on this message board, doesn't matter what subforum you're in.
#7
Pirate/Smuggler
#9
Senior Member
on some hills-a lot faster and easier to keep up with other riders on the downhill if that matters. If I ride fixed a lot when I get on a geared bike my spin in the saddle is good, but I have a dead spot while standing on hills. After I climb several hills and concentrate on pulling up I get rid of the dead spot, but I have to work at it. Don't know if that goes into the easier or harder of just different category.
#10
Fresh Garbage
#12
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,006
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
The OP has described ~50 mile, ~55 feet/mile elevation gain rides. This is smack dab in the middle between "flat" and "seriously hilly" riding. Will either FG or SS make a difference, really? Likely not. But selection of gearing might matter, depending on how strong a climber he is. Higher GI and more manageable descents in FG. Dunno...
#13
Fresh Garbage
#14
Senior Member
It just means the fixed gear masked the dead spot in your pedaling and the geared bike revealed it.
you're right hairnet. I get lazy on the fixed bike and let the pedal come up and the geared bike makes it really clear quickly! I would think it would be a bit easier to climb a short steep hill fixed than SS for this reason, but I don't know for a fact and have no intention of testing that out-far too lazy.
you're right hairnet. I get lazy on the fixed bike and let the pedal come up and the geared bike makes it really clear quickly! I would think it would be a bit easier to climb a short steep hill fixed than SS for this reason, but I don't know for a fact and have no intention of testing that out-far too lazy.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
2 Posts
https://www.strava.com/activities/272342196
this is my "benchmark" training. It shows a lot more ascension, but it's a mobile Strava thing. Running 46X16 in this ride.
So not huge steep hills, but a lot of smaller ones.
T13, take a virtual hug, man. You look nervous
this is my "benchmark" training. It shows a lot more ascension, but it's a mobile Strava thing. Running 46X16 in this ride.
So not huge steep hills, but a lot of smaller ones.
T13, take a virtual hug, man. You look nervous
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: CLE-OH
Posts: 1,337
Bikes: '84 Basso Pista, Masi Heinz '57 SS beater. Couple Stingrays...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I think most of the time, some of you guys take me as I'm being way more serious than I really am.
#19
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
If you allow the flywheel effect of the fixed gear to push your pedals through the dead spots, then it's stealing that power from forward momentum of the bike. This is something that cannot happen with a freewheel.
#20
Fresh Garbage
The bike is moving forward regardless fixed vs freewheel,tThere is no power input unless you're pedaling. Or are you saying fixed gears are perpetual motion devices? I would like that very much though
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,830
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4745 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,510 Posts
My experience is that when I am riding fixed and I can hit the bottom of a hill with speed (esp in rolling hills) I have so much more invested in my energy and muscular resources that I pedal much harder while my RPMs are high than I ever do with a freewheel. As a result, I often climb hills much faster fixed. I pay for that later. I estimate fix gear rides are roughly 25-335 harder than geared and a real amount harder than SS for mostly that reason.
I do have to confess I haven't done a side by side comparison of FG vs SS for 39 years. I only did it once and it wasn't a good test as I never pushed it on the fix gear. That was my first fix gear ride. Never rode SS again. I was sold.
Ben
I do have to confess I haven't done a side by side comparison of FG vs SS for 39 years. I only did it once and it wasn't a good test as I never pushed it on the fix gear. That was my first fix gear ride. Never rode SS again. I was sold.
Ben
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,830
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4745 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,510 Posts
Ben