Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Bike Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-15, 03:00 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bike Weight

Is the fixed gear bike weight really that important? If im a beginner and has only 500$ mark in terms the weight of my bike that Ill be buying shouldn't it have like a weight limit example dont buy fixies 25 pounds higher something like that? and frame wise? material? disadvantage and disadvantage of having a chromoly or hi-ten steel? Stuffs like that.
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-02-15, 03:04 PM
  #2  
pro in someone's theory
 
prooftheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3,236

Bikes: FTP

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Depends, are you carrying it or riding it?
prooftheory is offline  
Old 07-02-15, 03:06 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by prooftheory
Depends, are you carrying it or riding it?
of course im riding it man. u just want to know that advantages and disadvantages of such materials that will cut weight if it cut weight is it durable? something like that.
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-02-15, 03:13 PM
  #4  
pro in someone's theory
 
prooftheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3,236

Bikes: FTP

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tomalenn
of course im riding it man. u just want to know that advantages and disadvantages of such materials that will cut weight if it cut weight is it durable? something like that.
It was a serious question. You get people who are carrying their bikes up 4 flights of stairs and for them a 17 lb. bike is way better than a 24 lb. bike. Most of the difference you'll notice in bike weight is in rapid acceleration and not really as much in dealing with hills. Most people find that the weight in the wheels makes a bigger difference than the weight in the frame. Once you get to a chromoly frame the comparative advantage of lighter materials is less because steel can give a smoother ride. There aren't a whole lot of fixed gear weight weenies though. I'm not sure why that is.
prooftheory is offline  
Old 07-02-15, 03:25 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by prooftheory
It was a serious question. You get people who are carrying their bikes up 4 flights of stairs and for them a 17 lb. bike is way better than a 24 lb. bike. Most of the difference you'll notice in bike weight is in rapid acceleration and not really as much in dealing with hills. Most people find that the weight in the wheels makes a bigger difference than the weight in the frame. Once you get to a chromoly frame the comparative advantage of lighter materials is less because steel can give a smoother ride. There aren't a whole lot of fixed gear weight weenies though. I'm not sure why that is.
thats what i need to know man so steel is smoother ride? im like here in my home and i just want to ride like for exercise like theres a 10km park from my home that i want to go everyday for exercise and im not using much stairs if youre thinking about me carrying my bike all the time.
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-02-15, 03:58 PM
  #6  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 07-03-15, 12:45 PM
  #7  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,519

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4353 Post(s)
Liked 3,993 Times in 2,665 Posts
Originally Posted by prooftheory
It was a serious question. You get people who are carrying their bikes up 4 flights of stairs and for them a 17 lb. bike is way better than a 24 lb. bike. Most of the difference you'll notice in bike weight is in rapid acceleration and not really as much in dealing with hills. Most people find that the weight in the wheels makes a bigger difference than the weight in the frame. Once you get to a chromoly frame the comparative advantage of lighter materials is less because steel can give a smoother ride. There aren't a whole lot of fixed gear weight weenies though. I'm not sure why that is.
I want to be a fixed gear weight weenie someday. My goal is to build a sub 10lb bike at some point when I drop some serious weight and make some more serious cash. I figure if Rodriguez can build a 13lb steel framed geared bike, a ten pound fixed gear shouldn't be that hard.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 07-03-15, 05:25 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
SpeshulEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by tomalenn
thats what i need to know man so steel is smoother ride? im like here in my home and i just want to ride like for exercise like theres a 10km park from my home that i want to go everyday for exercise and im not using much stairs if youre thinking about me carrying my bike all the time.
If you're riding the bike for exercise, wouldn't a heavier bike provide you with a better workout?
__________________
Hey guys, lets go play bikes! Strava

SpeshulEd is offline  
Old 07-03-15, 06:23 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern San Diego
Posts: 1,726

Bikes: mid 1980s De Rosa SL, 1985 Tommasini Super Prestige all Campy SR, 1992 Paramount PDG Series 7, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1998 Trek Y-foil, 2006 Schwinn Super Sport GS, 2006 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by SpeshulEd
If you're riding the bike for exercise, wouldn't a heavier bike provide you with a better workout?

My experience is that my 18.5 lb Carbon Fiber bike climbs about 5-10% faster than my ~ 21.5 lb double-butted steel bike, configured similarly, with me as the rider, depending upon the gradient I'm climbing. For anything other than climbing, the performance difference is negligible. That 5-10% difference in climbing performance translates to maybe a 2% speed difference overall on the amalgam of all the terrain that I ride.
D1andonlyDman is offline  
Old 07-03-15, 06:55 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Noli Timere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: New York Metro Area
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's much cheaper to lose the weight off you instead of the bike and you'll get the same result.
Noli Timere is offline  
Old 07-03-15, 09:33 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Night_shift's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 388
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by D1andonlyDman
My experience is that my 18.5 lb Carbon Fiber bike climbs about 5-10% faster than my ~ 21.5 lb double-butted steel bike, configured similarly, with me as the rider, depending upon the gradient I'm climbing. For anything other than climbing, the performance difference is negligible. That 5-10% difference in climbing performance translates to maybe a 2% speed difference overall on the amalgam of all the terrain that I ride.
In other words, Weight wienies are as such because they need that 2% edge in a race. For me, you, the OP, the lurker, and the government shill reading this weight isn't too much of an issue. I would love to have a sub 15lb beast; That being said all my bikes are 20-24 lbs.
Night_shift is offline  
Old 07-04-15, 10:46 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
SpeshulEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,088
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I always thought weight weenies were just doing it for internet cred.
__________________
Hey guys, lets go play bikes! Strava

SpeshulEd is offline  
Old 07-04-15, 11:13 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,510 Times in 3,352 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeshulEd
If you're riding the bike for exercise, wouldn't a heavier bike provide you with a better workout?
The bike that is on the road gives a person a much better workout than the one stored in the basement.

Get a bike that you like and enjoy riding.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 07-04-15, 03:06 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
JeremyLC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 1,414

Bikes: 2008 Surly Cross Check, 2010 Fuji Track Comp

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 255 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Night_shift
In other words, Weight wienies are as such because they need that 2% edge in a race. For me, you, the OP, the lurker, and the government shill reading this weight isn't too much of an issue. I would love to have a sub 15lb beast; That being said all my bikes are 20-24 lbs.
Hi, government shill checking in. (okay, government employee...) Anyway, I bought my Cross Check without much concern for its weight. It's heavy. I took a hundred pounds or so off of me, and that made a huge difference. I bought my BMC Teammachine SLR02 with a bit more consideration for weight. I can definitely tell the difference a couple pounds makes.(*). Of course, the idea of me winning any kind of race is laughable.



*) They're both 105 groups, both 50/34 rings. The Surly has an 11-25 9sp, while the BMC has an 11-27(?) 10sp.
JeremyLC is offline  
Old 07-04-15, 03:08 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
JeremyLC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 1,414

Bikes: 2008 Surly Cross Check, 2010 Fuji Track Comp

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 255 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by veganbikes
my goal is to build a sub 10lb bike at some point and i'll need to drop some serious cash.

ftfy
JeremyLC is offline  
Old 07-04-15, 05:07 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Morris County, NJ
Posts: 1,102

Bikes: 90's Bianchi Premio, Raleigh-framed fixed gear, Trek 3500, Centurion hybrid, Dunelt 3-spd, Trek 800

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I haven't weighed my home-built fixed gear bike, but I can feel how much weight came off with the derailleurs, gear cluster, rear brake, etc. Fixies are lighter by their nature. I also replaced steel wheels and handlebars to alloy. It still has a cottered steel crank, but the fixie is lighter than my fairly light geared bike. It's also faster because the drive train is simpler - less drag.
habilis is offline  
Old 07-12-15, 01:22 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by habilis
I haven't weighed my home-built fixed gear bike, but I can feel how much weight came off with the derailleurs, gear cluster, rear brake, etc. Fixies are lighter by their nature. I also replaced steel wheels and handlebars to alloy. It still has a cottered steel crank, but the fixie is lighter than my fairly light geared bike. It's also faster because the drive train is simpler - less drag.
and more importantly your frame? because the frame is like the body and gets all the weight from the bike is yours chromoly or hi-ten? if talking about other gears such as wheel and bars i can change that easily but the body? thank you for your reply man!
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-12-15, 02:42 PM
  #18  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeshulEd
If you're riding the bike for exercise, wouldn't a heavier bike provide you with a better workout?
heavier bike means smoother ride? so you think if exercise wise i should get a not so light bike? you suggest?
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-12-15, 02:44 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D1andonlyDman
My experience is that my 18.5 lb Carbon Fiber bike climbs about 5-10% faster than my ~ 21.5 lb double-butted steel bike, configured similarly, with me as the rider, depending upon the gradient I'm climbing. For anything other than climbing, the performance difference is negligible. That 5-10% difference in climbing performance translates to maybe a 2% speed difference overall on the amalgam of all the terrain that I ride.
thank you for the reply sir so youre saying that if im going for a climbing style bike id go for much lighter? well theres no uphill much here in my place more road. so having a heavier bike around 21 to 23lbs is okay for me? you think?
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-12-15, 02:49 PM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thank you i will your replies enlighten me guys thank you all.
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-12-15, 02:52 PM
  #21  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JeremyLC
Hi, government shill checking in. (okay, government employee...) Anyway, I bought my Cross Check without much concern for its weight. It's heavy. I took a hundred pounds or so off of me, and that made a huge difference. I bought my BMC Teammachine SLR02 with a bit more consideration for weight. I can definitely tell the difference a couple pounds makes.(*). Of course, the idea of me winning any kind of race is laughable.



*) They're both 105 groups, both 50/34 rings. The Surly has an 11-25 9sp, while the BMC has an 11-27(?) 10sp.
so you mean its just not on the bike? and more on the person riding it too? but thats why im buying to cut me some weight.
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-12-15, 09:34 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern San Diego
Posts: 1,726

Bikes: mid 1980s De Rosa SL, 1985 Tommasini Super Prestige all Campy SR, 1992 Paramount PDG Series 7, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1998 Trek Y-foil, 2006 Schwinn Super Sport GS, 2006 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by tomalenn
thank you for the reply sir so youre saying that if im going for a climbing style bike id go for much lighter? well theres no uphill much here in my place more road. so having a heavier bike around 21 to 23lbs is okay for me? you think?
As far as climbing is concerned, lighter is certainly better, but not to the point that the frame flexes noticeably, because if you climb standing up on the pedals, significant flex means loss of pedaling power that is not transferred to the wheels. In the case of my personal carbon fiber bike, it is not only a few pounds lighter than my steel bikes, it is also somewhat stiffer laterally - those two criteria combine to make it a more efficient climbing machine than my other two bikes - but I certainly have not done any rigorous analysis to determine how much of the benefit is from weight, vs. stiffness. but my personal belief is that it's mostly the weight difference, because while it's stiffer than my best steel bikes, they are also pretty stiff too.
D1andonlyDman is offline  
Old 07-13-15, 07:01 AM
  #23  
T13
Senior Member
 
T13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: CLE-OH
Posts: 1,337

Bikes: '84 Basso Pista, Masi Heinz '57 SS beater. Couple Stingrays...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
You said yerself that you are a "beginner". You aren't even gonna know the difference in an 18lb bike and a 25lb bike. Get a ****ing bike, and go ride it.
T13 is offline  
Old 07-13-15, 07:05 AM
  #24  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by T13
You said yerself that you are a "beginner". You aren't even gonna know the difference in an 18lb bike and a 25lb bike. Get a ****ing bike, and go ride it.
okay man. lol whats with the hate? i just dont want to waste money on something im not sure of. chill dude.
tomalenn is offline  
Old 07-13-15, 07:07 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Okefenokee Swamps.
Posts: 577

Bikes: Rockhopper, Azor Oma cruiser

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The heavier the bike, the smoother the ride. My Dutch Azor weighs 50#, smooth riding, and is a b***h to life for mounting in my Feedback Sports bike repair stand. However, my 1992 Rockhopper isn't at all difficult to mount.
tjkoko is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.