Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 60
  1. #1
    The Silver Hammer emayex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, Specialized Hardrock, Lynskey Cooper
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Poor man's hubs vs ...

    so we all know about the junky hubs (aka quando, suzue)...

    in this corner: IRO/Formula Hubs

    in the other corner: Phil, Paul, Campy, DA, Level

    what is the difference?

    everybody with IRO hubs seems to love them....would they love the higher end hubs more?

    is it a feedback issue, efficiency, or is it just a label thing...which i guess is understandable?

    thank you kindly,
    max

  2. #2
    無くなった HereNT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sci-Fi Wasabi
    My Bikes
    I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know there was a huge difference between Surly and DA for me - I thought I was coasting when I put my new wheel on...

  3. #3
    Senior Member filtersweep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,615
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't speak for the specific hubs you mentioned, but there is such a thing as a wheel that becomes "too nice" for everyday use. I don't know what you use your bike for, but I'd save top shelf hubs for race day only wheels- if for no other reason than a top shelf hub needs a top shelf rim needs top shelf spokes... needs good supple (get shredded on the streets) tires, blah, blah, blah...

    If you are locking your bike up, you might want a worry free hub. If you don't want to be afraid of the weather, you might want a low maintenance hub. I don't want my equipment to dictate when and where I ride.

    Frankly, when you reach a certain level in quality, you'll feel more of a difference from your tires than your hubs... or even tire pressure.

    That's my three and a half cents...

  4. #4
    Iguana Subsystem dolface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    san francisco
    Posts
    4,016
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    that's an interesting question. i usually follow the 'buy the best you can afford' philosophy, so i went from suzue basics (cr4p) to phils and campys.

    i was able to tell the difference easily, but from what i've heard of formula/iro hubs, i'n not convinced i could differentiate between them and phils/campys based purely on the way they ride.

    i look forward to hearing other folk's opinions/experiences.

  5. #5
    hang up your boots ostro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    My Bikes
    84 Pinarello, Trek Liquid 30, Torker CX 24, Gromada Track
    Posts
    1,574
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    havent ridden the phils, but i bought Phil spec'd bearings for my IRO's. The IRO bearings are not bad, but the Phil spec bearings seem to roll a bit smoother.

    I honestly dont think anyone would notice a performance difference in the hub itself. There are too many variables that would affect your judgement. Spokes, wheels, tires, airpressure, spoke tightness road conditions. (EDIT: have to add lacing pattern, faulty lacing could destroy a hub)

    However, one aspect off phils that i have noticed that is better, is the overall craftsmanship. I think they are definetly manufactured to higher specification then are the IRO hubs.
    Last edited by ostro; 05-07-05 at 09:54 PM.

  6. #6
    The Silver Hammer emayex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, Specialized Hardrock, Lynskey Cooper
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    more answers like dolface and ostro.....no wheel is "too good to rid," and that has nothing to do with the question...

    the best you can afford rule is nice...but i think a lot of it must be in the name..no? i mean you dolface of all people know of the crap thet goes for a fortune on ebay because it is branded campy or has a little clover on it

    ive heard as much ranting with joy abour the iro sets as i have for phils...is that because the people who have iro's are reaplcing incredible crap and anything is an upgrade? or are they really basically equivalent?

    ~me

  7. #7
    Cornucopia of Awesomeness baxtefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    not where i used to be
    Posts
    4,847
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've never seen or ridden high end hubs like phils, but in the past 2 days I've played with 3 sets of hubs of varying degrees of quality: sovos (?) crap hubs off a KHS that I just sold, my IRO hubs on my commuter, and the ProMax set that replaced the Sovos'
    I would rank them: Sovos<IRO<Promax (and I sure 99% of everyone here would agree)
    The difference between the Sovos and the IRO/ProMax is night and day. The bearings felt square and chunky and the hub body itself was crap. Cheap weak threads.
    The differences between the IROs and ProMax were more subtle. duh! you say, they're both mid-range hubs.
    But I doubt that my riding skill would be able to distinguish between a midrange hub and phil or a DA, or campy.....
    {o,o**
    |)__)
    -"-"-

    O RLY?

  8. #8
    The Silver Hammer emayex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, Specialized Hardrock, Lynskey Cooper
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hmmm i forgot ProMax...i guess ive been kinda jaded by my basic hub

  9. #9
    nothing: lasts forever ink1373's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    minneapolis
    Posts
    1,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well, i have a couple wheelsets with IROs, and i am soon building a set with phils.

    my IRO hubs have been wonderful. i don't have a bad thing to say about them. however, phils have passed the test of time, and durability is what i'm most concerned about.

    the fact that phil now makes cogs is a big plus to me, too. perfect hub/cog/lockring compatibility is a good thing.

  10. #10
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a wheel with a Pro Max and a wheel with an IRO hub, I can't say I notice any practical difference between them. On the other hand, when I first tossed my old Suzue basic hub for the Pro Max wheel, there was a pretty huge difference.

    So the cheapest stuff out there rides noticeably worse but this plebe can't tell the difference between adequate and primo.

  11. #11
    Aluminum. justin79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I bought Phils because I don't want to have to think about the reliability or performance of my hubs. Good results so far.

  12. #12
    Iguana Subsystem dolface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    san francisco
    Posts
    4,016
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by emayex
    more answers like dolface and ostro.....no wheel is "too good to rid," and that has nothing to do with the question...

    the best you can afford rule is nice...but i think a lot of it must be in the name..no? i mean you dolface of all people know of the crap thet goes for a fortune on ebay because it is branded campy or has a little clover on it

    ive heard as much ranting with joy abour the iro sets as i have for phils...is that because the people who have iro's are reaplcing incredible crap and anything is an upgrade? or are they really basically equivalent?

    ~me
    to be sure, there is a lot of overpriced crap out there, and people who are willing to pay for it based on name alone, and that's the way it is for anything.

    riding performance isn't the only variable i pay attention to though, things like durability, useful lifetime, manufacturing processes, and community involvement also figure into the equation.

    for frames, since i like classic lugged steel i'm a little constrained, likewise for the campy high-flange stuff.

    for modern stuff though, i have a choice, and i chose phils. i ride them almost every day, and i can't think of a reason why i would ever need to replace them. sure,they'll need new bearings at some point, but unless i get into a truely horrendous accident i should be able to ride those hubs for the rest of my life.

    also they're made within fifty miles of where i live, and when i called them up to ask if they wanted to donate anything for prizes for the alleycat that judah is putting on (basically, a race put on by one guy with no track record, and a bunch of his friends), they kicked down a bunch of stuff, including a hubset.

    that kind of community support is valuable to me, and is one more (non-performance) reason, i'm happy to give them my money, even if i'm paying a premium.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    718
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    some of the $$$ for phil's goes towards paying people in the US a decent wage for a decent day's work. I think that's a good thing.

  14. #14
    hang up your boots ostro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    My Bikes
    84 Pinarello, Trek Liquid 30, Torker CX 24, Gromada Track
    Posts
    1,574
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I totally agree with Dollface and potus. The money we spend on local manufacturers and vendors goes right back to the community. And, it makes a good thing better!

  15. #15
    Total Hack labratmatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think the IRO's can be beat for the money. I would put my IRO's against most any hub. I haven't ridden Phil's, but I bet I couldn't tell the difference. I can see however, that Phil's might have a longer lifetime or something like that.
    My brain: it's my second favorite organ. - Woody Allen (Sleeper)

  16. #16
    Sheldon Certified Jaminsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    San Francisco And Crimebridge
    My Bikes
    '81 Bianchi road/track conversion, certified by Sheldon
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I basically bought Phil for the simple design, bearings, domestic factory/ non-slave labour and reputation for strength and durability. I'm going to leave these things to my kids when I die. I dont understand why/how you could actually feel the difference between hubs though, that doesn't make sense to me. Can others actually tell a difference in stiffness and whatnot on hubs? Are we talking about bearings? Because you can buy as set of Phil bearings for cheaps and slap them right into you current hubset no prob...

  17. #17
    Senior Member jordache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I stripped an IRO hub. Besides feeling remarkably smoother, I quickly realized that with a Phil I didn't have to worry about anything going wrong. Riding brakeless puts a lot of strain on your hub, and you don't want to suddenly find out that you can coast. Well worth the extra cash.

  18. #18
    BIG RING Bikeophile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hamilton (Formerly Toronto)
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The IRO Hubs are nice for the money, but put against any other hub? Not a chance. They are smooth, but not as smooth as Phil, Campy, Dura Ace, Promax, Level, or even Woodman in my experience. As well, try them in a year of regular use and you will see the difference continues.

    Please don't misunderstand me though. For the money I would place the IRO Hubs (as well as Miche Hubs) as the best value for the money in the entry level to mid range hubs.

    As well as paying for locally built Hubs costing a little more (not only because of salaries, but also because of lack of importing, duties etc), Campy, Phil, Paul, Level Hubs are better. Are they THAT much better, my opinion is definitely yes. Does everyone care about THAT much better? Definitely not.

    If EVERYONE wanted the BEST or could afford the BEST, our streets would be lined with sports cars and BMW's and no Echo's and Sunfires!

  19. #19
    Senior Member filtersweep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,615
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by emayex
    no wheel is "too good to rid," and that has nothing to do with the question...
    Hey, I'm just saying a $300-400 hubset in a $800 to $1300 wheelset? A Formula set for $85? Or a Campy Pista set for over $400? Of course there is a difference. My point is you won't notice the difference nearly as much (if at all) on a street with flat-resistant clinchers as on a track with silk tubulars... that the application of a hub has some influence on the perceived value of its strengths or weaknesses. You ask if the difference is worth it- it may well be worth it to a racer. There truly is a law of diminishing returns when it comes to equipment.

  20. #20
    The Silver Hammer emayex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, Specialized Hardrock, Lynskey Cooper
    Posts
    787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah dude...sorry to snap.......i just did not want the thread to tunr noward people talking about their "sweet 5th tuesday of the month track day wheelsets." i definately know what you are saying

    as for made in usa....don can tell you...i fully support slave labor...hurah for capitalism!

    toodles

  21. #21
    Jonnys ilegitimate Father cavernmech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    toronto
    My Bikes
    too many too list
    Posts
    2,994
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Campy and Dura -Ace both use a "loose"bearing in their hubs. Generally these run smoother and a little easier than any stock cartridge bearing hub. Cartridges have a fair bit of hydraulic resistance to them and whether or not you can feel it with your legs, there is a difference. Zipp uses very high end ceramic bearings in their hubs for this reason. You can gewt ceramic replacement cartridges for just about any hub....and these will roll easier than stock bearings. I had an old (80's) Dura-Ace hub that I rode the hell out of when I was on the road and with regular re-packing lasted me for 5 years upon which time I sold it too a German Messenger who then rode it for another 4 years. The biggest downside to the Suzue basic is the smaller bearing size in the fixed side. Why they do this I will never know.

  22. #22
    I need more bikes!!! Mr. Shadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Durham, NC
    My Bikes
    2 roadies, 7 fixed-gears, 1 hardtail, 1 full suspension mtb, and 1 hybrid...so far.
    Posts
    472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by filtersweep
    I can't speak for the specific hubs you mentioned, but there is such a thing as a wheel that becomes "too nice" for everyday use....
    I have Campy Record on my commuter.
    "We are few now, but one day we will rule." That's what one of my fixies whispered as I walked by. I nodded in agreement, and thanked it for not waking the others.

  23. #23
    Senior Member filtersweep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,615
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Shadow
    I have Campy Record on my commuter.
    I do too- with Armadillos- and my point is, it is ridiculous. Beautiful hub, but with those tires, on city streets, it feels no better than my Nashbar hub.

  24. #24
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    brooklyn
    My Bikes
    GTtrack,MajorTaylor track,R900
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    switching da hubs for phil woods adds 1.5lbs to ur bike...

  25. #25
    SuperstitiousHyperrealist jinx_removing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Boston
    My Bikes
    unknown road conversion, half built Benotto track
    Posts
    433
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just wanted to add that I don't really see how my IRO's could roll any smoother. If there is a difference between them and other hubs that are $200 more I don't think I'd be able to tell. While it is true that you get what you pay for in a lot of cases, a lot of times the American consumer believes that if they spend more money the product will be far superior. I think what you are paying for on some of the higher end products is reputation. I'm willing to take the gamble with my cheapo hubs that work great and we'll see how long they last. If I get three years out of them I'll be happy, by that point I will probably have the itch to build an entirely new wheelset anyway.

    My $.02

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •