Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    無くなった HereNT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sci-Fi Wasabi
    My Bikes
    I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ? on computer and tires

    So I broke down and bought a real computer because my GPS just wasn't doing the trick for me, and I've got a quick question :

    If I'm running 700x23c Conti Ultra 2000's, should I still be using the 23c setting in the computer? Or do these tires run fatter or slimmer than normal 23c? They look a little fatter.... Actually, when I went to check the specs on them just now, I noticed that my front fork has been wearing away the rubber on the front tire! Time to dremel again, I guess...

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    23c uses 23 setting.... I don't get it.

  3. #3
    Cornucopia of Awesomeness baxtefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    not where i used to be
    Posts
    4,847
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    not all 23's are 23's
    do a roll out to measure the *real* circumference of your wheels and input that number.

  4. #4
    ... tlupfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1.) You could not fret over the ridiculously marginal difference
    2.) You could measure your rollout distance on a daily basis before riding (this is especially applicable if you're riding brakeless). Don't forget to properly weight the bike at the intended psi so that you can take into account tire deformation.

  5. #5
    Shadow Member simple312's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn (chicago until july07)
    My Bikes
    bareknuckle fixed, cannondale track, nishiki conversion
    Posts
    189
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ***scratches head*** sorry im still a bit new (after reading/lurking for a while) but does this belong in a diffrent subsection? this is the first question i have heard about computers for a bike here (the ss/fixed section).

    seems like there would another section that uses bike computes more.

  6. #6
    Lone Fixie 80sMutRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Providence, RI
    My Bikes
    Fixie/SS: Specialized "Langster", Hobo SS: Schwinn World Sport
    Posts
    209
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd say repost this one in the Road Cycling forum, you'll probably get more/better/less sarcastic) answers there, maybe.
    Marla, the little scratch on the roof of your mouth that would heal, if only you could just stop tounging it, but you can't

  7. #7
    jab
    jab is offline
    Ride more. jab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HereNT
    So I broke down and bought a real computer because my GPS just wasn't doing the trick for me, and I've got a quick question :

    If I'm running 700x23c Conti Ultra 2000's, should I still be using the 23c setting in the computer?
    You could start out with the 23c setting in the computer (rolling diameter 2097mm, per Sheldon), and use your GPS to fine-tune it.

    -JAB
    Not so fast boy-o! Well, if it was up to me, I'd let ya go. But the lads have a temper, and they've been crankin' all day!

  8. #8
    無くなった HereNT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sci-Fi Wasabi
    My Bikes
    I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 80sMutRider
    I'd say repost this one in the Road Cycling forum, you'll probably get more/better/less sarcastic) answers there, maybe.
    Yeah, but since the computer is on a track bike, I figured I'd post here... I guess I'll go ask them

    Quote Originally Posted by jab
    You could start out with the 23c setting in the computer (rolling diameter 2097mm, per Sheldon), and use your GPS to fine-tune it.
    My GPS told me I hit 147mph the other day. I'm not really trusting it anymore - that's why I got the computer. The chart that came with it said 2096mm - I doubt it makes much difference, but I just kinda want to know how slow I really am...

  9. #9
    LF for the accentdeprived
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    3,550
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If I were you, I'd be more worried about the "front fork wears the tire away" bit. That sounds bad.
    Just set the computer according to the 23c value they give and fine-tune it later to the milestones (?) on a country road.

  10. #10
    無くなった HereNT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sci-Fi Wasabi
    My Bikes
    I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If I were you, I'd be more worried about the "front fork wears the tire away" bit. That sounds bad.
    I think a lot of that was from riding in the rain the other day - lots of sand and grit getting inbetween the fork and the tire. It doesn't look to be rubbing when I just spin the wheel, but I think the clearance is tight enough that I could only fit about four sheets of 20# paper between the wheel and the crown... Got the battery for my dremel tool on the charger as I type...

  11. #11
    Spoked to Death phidauex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
    Posts
    1,334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just do a rollout test... I always do them, since I don't trust the charts. Pump your tires up, put a mark on the front tire, and a mark on the ground on a long flat place. Line the marks up, and then roll the bike forward for 10 revolutions, stopping with the mark right at the ground. Make another mark on the ground there, and then measure the distance between the two marks, and divide by ten. The long rollout will reduce your error, and you'll get a veeery close circumference measure. It only takes a few minutes, and is easier than trying to line up to road markers (which aren't always accurate either).

    peace,
    sam

  12. #12
    jab
    jab is offline
    Ride more. jab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HereNT
    My GPS told me I hit 147mph the other day. I'm not really trusting it anymore - that's why I got the computer.
    Yes, I've been up to around 800mi/hr myself, the same way. In my experience, GPS units get sketchy when enough satellites are obstructed, or coming around a corner in a mountain pass when the unit is "switching" between two groups of satellites. It seems that the units will "fake it" for a few seconds, before either being able to properly re-acquiring signals or giving up and deciding that they don't know where they are anymore.

    That doesn't render GPS totally untrustworthy; one just needs to keeps its limitations in mind.

    Two ways come to mind to get good GPS data for calibration: 1) on a straight, flat course with a good signal, make waypoints (and some sort of visual markers) at the ends of the course. Then, ride that course a few times with the bike computer. The GPS distance between the waypoints should be really accurate for comparison against the bike computer. 2) set the GPS up on the bike so that it holds a good signal while riding, reset the GPS and bike computer odometers, and ride for a few miles. I used #2 over several short (3-10mi) trips to convince myself that my bike computer was giving reasonable values. I kept an eye on the satellite signal display during tests.

    -JAB
    Not so fast boy-o! Well, if it was up to me, I'd let ya go. But the lads have a temper, and they've been crankin' all day!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •