Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Member protaghiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Crank Arms 165mm vs 170mm

    I need some crank arms. Is it really that important to have 165mm vs 170mm arms? On Sheldon Brown's they hype 165mm for fixed riding. However, I can get some 170mm arms for much cheaper at a LBS. What length do you all run?

  2. #2
    Senior Member shishi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    brooklyn, NY
    My Bikes
    Sparton(custon track), Fuji
    Posts
    1,291
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    165mm no pedal strikes

  3. #3
    "Great One" 53-11_alltheway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
    Posts
    4,463
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think this depends on how high the BB is?

    On some road conversions you can have a frame with a 8cm BB drop (range is 8cm-6.5cm). On a dedicated track frame you are talking about a 5cm BB drop. That's a 15-30mm difference (which affects crank length maximum at the bottom of the pedal stroke)

  4. #4
    Radio Bemba 00.0 EnLaCalle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Rocking the spot.
    Posts
    866
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Agreed. E.g. sugino 75 cranks (and others) run from 165 to 175 in 2.5mm incements. What you get I think is dependent on your bike. If you have a real track bike with a raised BB, the difference between 165 and 170 shouldn't really matter as far as the pedal strike issue goes. If you're riding a conversion, maybe go with 165.

  5. #5
    Spoked to Death phidauex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
    Posts
    1,334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Conversions really beg for 165mm cranks... My Maserati conversion started with 27" wheels with big 1 1/4" tires. I switched to 700c wheels, which dropped the BB a little bit, and then 23mm tires, which dropped it a little farther still. I actually pedal strike quite a bit, and its a terrifying thing to have happen. I think the stock cranks are 172.5mm. I'm definately putting on a set of 165mms as soon as I can find a set for a price I want to pay.

    peace,
    sam

  6. #6
    jack of one or two trades Aeroplane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Suburbia, CT
    My Bikes
    Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB
    Posts
    5,635
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My conversion is currently bolted to a pair of ultra-cheap 170s. If I take a corner in town with any sort of speed, I get a LOT of pedal strike. So, I either slow down for corners or scrape the heck out of my Looks. Either way, I'm saving for a decent pair of 165s.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Irwin Goldstein
    Men should never ride bicycles. Riding should be banned and outlawed. It is
    the most irrational form of exercise I could ever bring to discussion.

  7. #7
    roll'em high shants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    columbus, ohio
    Posts
    2,392
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    one thing that might be helpful (it is for me) is to lean your body more than your bike when you take turns on conversions. it often requires getting out of the saddle to do it much, but it'll allow you to take sharper turns.

  8. #8
    I sing the body electric
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PHL
    My Bikes
    2006 CrossCheck, Fuji Track 2004
    Posts
    694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    other than pedal strike and clearance between foot and front wheel, are there spinning/pedalling advantages to 165 cranks?

  9. #9
    Spoked to Death phidauex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
    Posts
    1,334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Shorter cranks means your legs don't move as far forward and backward, which means you can spin faster. For two riders with the same gain ratio and different crank lengths, the one with the shorter cranks will be able to go faster, since they'll be able to spin their legs quicker.

    peace,
    sam

  10. #10
    Cornucopia of Awesomeness baxtefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    not where i used to be
    Posts
    4,847
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i run 175's on my conversion. so far so good. just slow for the corners. The Q of your pedals is going to make more of a difference in cornering clearance than 5mm on your cranks.
    my track bike is going to have 170's on a 42 degree baked track.

  11. #11
    "Great One" 53-11_alltheway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
    Posts
    4,463
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by baxtefer
    The Q of your pedals is going to make more of a difference in cornering clearance than 5mm on your cranks.
    Good point. Using something like an eggbeater would probably give you more clearance than toe clips for example.
    "The Iron never lies to you. The Iron will always kick you the real deal. It never freaks out on me, never runs. Friends may come and go, but 200 pounds is always 200 pounds." -Henry Rollins

  12. #12
    Senior Member TimArchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    My Bikes
    Zeus (Razesa) tarck, Giant TCR road, Eddy Merckx road, Fuji Touring Series IV for everything else
    Posts
    1,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the smaller the crank, the less distance your feet must travel per revolution (shorter radius gives smaller circumference). also, your feet will be traveling slightly slower for the same wheel speed on a shorter crank (probably not noticable with a 5mm difference)

    What you lose with shorter cranks is leverage which you may notice when climbing or starting a sprint. A longer crank gives more mechanical advantage.

    As for pedaling power in general, I heard somewhere that in a study of crank lengths between 110mm and 200mm, the really short cranks gave the most power overall (balancing leverage power with spin power). But I think that this study was really old and may have had some serious flaws.

    so, in the end, I think the overall impression is that shorter cranks are better for spinning, longer cranks are better for mashing. You may not notice the difference between 170 and 165mm or it may make all the difference in the world.

    tim
    Quote Originally Posted by Josh Frank
    I will derive power from their cries of despair. My crank a speedy dervish, spinning and spinning through the darkest night that anyone with the audacity to try and suck my wheel will ever see...

  13. #13
    Cornucopia of Awesomeness baxtefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    not where i used to be
    Posts
    4,847
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 53-11_alltheway
    That's what I think too. Using something like an eggbeater would probably give you more clearance than toe clips for example.
    yup, platforms are bulky. funny thing... I was in the LBS a while ago talking to their track frame designer (former dutch national champion - designs frames for Cramerotti) He specs a 7cm BB drop on their frames since "modern pedals are so much narrower than the things [he] raced on".

    eggbeaters are wider than you think. my cornering clearance actually dropped when i switched to eggs from cheapo SPDs.

  14. #14
    Senior Member TimArchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    My Bikes
    Zeus (Razesa) tarck, Giant TCR road, Eddy Merckx road, Fuji Touring Series IV for everything else
    Posts
    1,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    oh yeah, I run 170's but only b/c I can't afford another crankset. They're on a fuji track and I've only had pedal strike once or twice.

    tim
    Quote Originally Posted by Josh Frank
    I will derive power from their cries of despair. My crank a speedy dervish, spinning and spinning through the darkest night that anyone with the audacity to try and suck my wheel will ever see...

  15. #15
    "Great One" 53-11_alltheway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
    Posts
    4,463
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TimArchy
    As for pedaling power in general, I heard somewhere that in a study of crank lengths between 110mm and 200mm, the really short cranks gave the most power overall (balancing leverage power with spin power). But I think that this study was really old and may have had some serious flaws.
    They didn't adjust seat position at all when they changed crank length. That throws the whole study out the window IMO.

    When I go from 175mm cranks to 180mm cranks I have to change seat position or else I lose power with 180s. That's just a 5mm difference. The range of crank lengths in that study was huge.

    P.S. I'm not an advocate of "proportional cranks" or anything like that. Too long of cranks can in fact hurt your cycling.
    "The Iron never lies to you. The Iron will always kick you the real deal. It never freaks out on me, never runs. Friends may come and go, but 200 pounds is always 200 pounds." -Henry Rollins

  16. #16
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,913
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I converted a Centurion Le Mans 12. I had 175mmranks on it for a while with 40x14 ratio.

    This LeMans has a higher BB by 1" over my new Lemond Poprad. (Don't remember off hand what the drop or height actually is)

    I never had strike when I had 175mm cranks, but always worried about it and cornered conservatively. I changed cranks to Sugino 170mm (and changed ratio to 48x17), I opted for 170 over 165 as I am 6'2' and LBS strongly suggested 165 would be too short for me. I now corner much more agressively and still have no strike yet.

    I mention the ratios above because one thing I found counter to the idea one can spin easier with shorter cranks is that with the 175x40x14 I could spin faster (130rpm) consistently than now with 170x48x17 where 120rpm is my steady state limit. Note these overall combined ratios end up being only about 2% different.

    Al

  17. #17
    mountain troll deadly downtube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    santa cruz mountains
    My Bikes
    the hummer brand mountain bike
    Posts
    1,126
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i bet those 165mm fanatics don't even know how small 5mm is...

  18. #18
    Spoked to Death phidauex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
    Posts
    1,334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    5mm isn't much, but a 165mm crank has 3cm less travel per revolution than a 170mm, and that is a noticable amount.

    Also, a bike with 70mm of BB drop, and reasonably long platform pedals (shoe to shoe outer measurement of around 378mm) will strike at 25.6 degrees with 175mm cranks, 26.8 degrees with 170mm cranks and 28 degrees with 165mm cranks.

    velocity = sqrt(9.8 * radius * tan (lean angle)), in meters, seconds and degrees.

    That puts your max turn speed around a 12m radius at 16.75, 17.24 and 17.69 mph for 175, 170 and 165 mm cranks, respectively. Sure, 5mm isn't much, but that is a meaningful change in max turn speed, nearly 1mph between 175 and 165, all else being equal. You'd have to lower your Q by 20mm to equal the change achieved by lowering crank length by 5mm. Both methods will have the same effect, but crank length or BB drop gets you more turning speed per mm of change than Q.

    *puts away his engineering calculator*

    peace,
    sam

  19. #19
    Try my pork bun! Mercier666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    My Bikes
    70's Mercier
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My frame has a high track-style BB and i run a 165 mm which is a nice combo because you're practically guaranteed to avoid scrapin your pedals.

  20. #20
    LV 99 9999HP/9999MP Erich Zann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    West Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    crappy fake bike
    Posts
    245
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    165 are good because there is more room to avoid a pedal strike and there is more room to avoid toe overlap. However I chose 170 because I like the extra arm leverage. I think using 165mm ranks on a conversion is a good idea because of the lower bottom bracket height. On my track frames i use 170.

  21. #21
    無くなった HereNT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sci-Fi Wasabi
    My Bikes
    I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use 171's. They're purty.

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Custom Custom Custom
    Posts
    5,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i got a 170mm 105 crank for $29 shipped. not complaining. besides, the iro frame has a high BB

  23. #23
    pluralis majestatis redfooj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    DEN
    My Bikes
    blue fuji, black khs, yellow giant, and a little red 'Rosa
    Posts
    2,547
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    170s on a road convert--73.5 & 73.5... no overlap and havent struck ground yet... though sometimes during quick cornering pixies next to my head yell "WATCH OUT" and i uncontrollably understeer wide

  24. #24
    "Great One" 53-11_alltheway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Might as well be underwater because I make less drag than a torpedoE (no aero bars here though)
    Posts
    4,463
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nitropowered
    i got a 170mm 105 crank for $29 shipped. not complaining. besides, the iro frame has a high BB
    So you went with the IRO frame, huh? (I think that one has a 5.0cm BB drop)

    Have you decided on parts?
    "The Iron never lies to you. The Iron will always kick you the real deal. It never freaks out on me, never runs. Friends may come and go, but 200 pounds is always 200 pounds." -Henry Rollins

  25. #25
    Senior Member jordache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by shants
    one thing that might be helpful (it is for me) is to lean your body more than your bike when you take turns on conversions. it often requires getting out of the saddle to do it much, but it'll allow you to take sharper turns.
    This is what I do. I also know the cornering limit of my bike pretty well. On fast, tight corners I end up leaning the top tube against the leg that is at the outside of the turn to guarantee that the inside pedal won't scrape.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •