Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member rvabiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    798
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Steamroller riders, help me...

    I'm ordering a Surly Steamroller tommorow but I can't decide on a size. I'd get a 57 or 58 and be fine but the only come in 56 and then jump to 59. I know people say that they like there track frames a little smaller than normal but I just want to make sure. Anyone close to my height (6 foot) ride either of those sizes? What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    psn
    psn is offline
    Physics Junkie
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, GT Pulse, Specialized S-Works E5
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6 feet exactly. I ride the 56 - it has a 56.8 cm top tube (that's probably the most important dimension to get right), and that's even a tad (like 0.5 cm) bit long for me, but I have a short torso and long arms.

  3. #3
    best-dressed mess gnatthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SF -> BK
    My Bikes
    2 Unicycles duct taped together
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Steamrollers tend to run a bit long. I'd go for the 56.

  4. #4
    Senior Member andrew young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis
    My Bikes
    Trek road bike, schwinn fixed conversion
    Posts
    505
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just gotna Steamroller frame a couple of weeks ago but have yet to put it together. I think it's the largest or close to it, maybe it's a 61 or 62. I'm 6'2", so I figured it would be a perfecr size. My current rig, an 04' Pista, is a 61cm frame, and it fits me perfectly. I think you should go with a 59cm frame, but that's just my opinion. Roll with it, baby.......
    Wire Will Break, but I don't have any cables right now.........

  5. #5
    Yay!11! I has!!!1 ImOnCrank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastcoast
    My Bikes
    Cocaine the white stallion, Custom Witcomb pista, (Being restored) 80's Pogliaghi Track, (destroyed) RAP Round Breeze NJS, Cannondale Jekyll 900, 84/5 Pinarello Montello (all italian)
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If it doesn't look like it's your size, why bother?
    Bloodstains, speed kills, fast bikes, cheap thrills, French girls, fine wine...

  6. #6
    griffin_ griffin_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    phila
    My Bikes
    raliegh "too lazy to make my own" rush hour
    Posts
    728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the guy at the lbs i don't go to anymore says they are pretty heavy
    any truth to that?
    he is also an *******

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    No Va but ride also in So Md
    My Bikes
    Cervelo SLC-SL, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
    Posts
    8,442
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I believe that size is measured center to top. So a 56 is more like a 54.5 or 55 and the 59 is more like a 58. As another poster said, the top tube length is more important. I think a 56.8 cm top tube would fit a 6'0" rder well. So I would go with the 56 if I were you.

  8. #8
    troglodyte ryan_c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    the tunnels
    My Bikes
    Soma DoubleCross, Surly Steamroller, various others
    Posts
    1,284
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'm 6'1" or 6'2" ish, with long legs, and ride a 56cm steamroller. and it doesn't look goofy or undersized at all. very comfortable.

  9. #9
    Senior Member andrew young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis
    My Bikes
    Trek road bike, schwinn fixed conversion
    Posts
    505
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, my Steamroller seems a little heavy, but then again I'm compairing it to my Pista, which is slightly lighter, but who cares at this point?
    Wire Will Break, but I don't have any cables right now.........

  10. #10
    psn
    psn is offline
    Physics Junkie
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    My Bikes
    Surly Steamroller, GT Pulse, Specialized S-Works E5
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tell your LBS ******* about my Steamroller. It's plenty light.

    http://web.mit.edu/psn/www/step2/IMG_0713.jpg

    [Edit: Ok, I concede that the frame is hardly the lightest thing ever, but unless you want to blow through the 15 lbs. barrier, you can still make a Steamroller pretty light, i.e. less than 16.5 lbs when I'm done.]
    Last edited by psn; 09-16-05 at 06:59 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •