Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    vegan straightedge
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    a thread about frames

    everyone seems to be all about steel, lugged track frames and scoffs at the idea of aluminum frames but no one can tell me why. durability vs. weight? are aluminum frames not as durable (even these days)? do lugged frames spread out the stress on the welds more?

    Just playing devil's advocate.

  2. #2
    hullo. drac_vamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    san francisco
    My Bikes
    74 paramount track, 80s maruishi track, 70s chesini track.
    Posts
    1,458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you dent a steel frame it's fine. and if you **reallllly dent a steel frame you can replace a tube. plus there's that totally ambiguous and obligatory catch phrase: "steel is real", and to that i say try to disprove! impossible.
    t.h.r.

  3. #3
    Iguana Subsystem dolface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    san francisco
    Posts
    4,016
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    aluminum frames fatigue, steel frames do not, and so last pretty much forever.
    steel frames can be repaired if they're crashed or bent, aluminum frames pretty much can't.

    lugs are pretty, lugs are classic, steel feels nice to ride.

    aluminum feels kinda jittery to me.

    i don't think everyone scoffs at alu, there are a number of peeps here who rock alu frames, and seem to be pretty happy with them.

  4. #4
    we're here, we steer!! mrRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,412
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i really like my aluminum frame, althought it is jittery, its also super responsive, being that it really has very little flex. Its a much choppier ride than the steel steeds i've ridden.

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    each his/her own.

    I like steel for reasons Dolface stated.


    S/F<
    CEYA!
    steel is REAL!

  6. #6
    Senior Member Surferbruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles/Aveyron France
    Posts
    5,308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i actually prefer alu for my geared road bikes. stiff, light, inexpensive. i figure in a couple-few years they're gonna be replaced(read: out of date) anyway. now for my fixed gear bike(s) it's more about aesthetics and feel. timeless stuff. my lugged pinarello sits on one end, my new cervelo on the other side.

  7. #7
    GG + Wendy O. 4EVA raygunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Blatz To The Future
    Posts
    1,482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Anyone else having THREAD DEJA VU ?!??!!?

  8. #8
    Skidmaster teadoggg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    don walker, redline, TBD
    Posts
    1,627
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    dude, aluminum (al-loo-MIN-e-ummm) sucks. what kind of idiot would ride an aluminum (al-loo-MIN-e-ummm) frame??? Especially an AMERICAN BUILT one.

    MORONS

  9. #9
    sometimes it hurts...
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    2006 DeBernardi Track, Home-made Tall Bike, Custom 3-Speed Schwinn? Road Bike.
    Posts
    187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah, lugs are pretty...

  10. #10
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by raygunner
    Anyone else having THREAD DEJA VU ?!??!!?


    YEAH, almost every thread has that feeling now. go with the flow.lol

    S/F,
    CEYA!

  11. #11
    I like turtles mascher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Philly
    My Bikes
    Pink Nightmare (RIP), Kona Smoke fixed conversion, Surly Steamroller, Schwinn hardtail, Raleigh singlespeed mtb conversion (soon to be RIP), Green Road Biest
    Posts
    898
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, after 3 550 200 miles on my steel frame, it's still going strong, but my Cannondale blew out from fatigue after only 778 996 miles.

    Me, I prefer bikes to frames.

  12. #12
    Beausage is Beautiful Fugazi Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    My Bikes
    2006 Langster, which I actually like.
    Posts
    5,456
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride an aluminum Basso frame and love it. Not jittery at all, but stiff and responsive and it rides great. There isn't a damned thing inherently wrong with aluminum frames, and anyone who says there is is talking out of his ass.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Kiecker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Redondo Beach
    My Bikes
    '05 Lemond Fillmore, '05 Surly 1x1, '04 Fuji Track Pro, '02 Specialized Stumpjumper, '92 GT Tequesta
    Posts
    533
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think it you also need to consider what your intended purpose for the bike not base desision solely on material alone. Lets say you take to identical geo bikes but one is made of steel and one is made of Al. If you were going to ride in a rougher environment you may want to take the steel bike due to steel's natural damping effect to help soak up the rougher environment. Now let's say you were going to spend an entire day just climbing or riding a track you may prefer a stiffer frame so the power is being transmitted directly from you to the ground and not being lost within the frame while also typically riding a lighter frame. There are pluses and minus to steel and Al, as well as Ti, Carbon, Scandium, and/or any sort of composite in between. Weigh them out with your intended purposes....and preferences...and then your decision should be easier.

  14. #14
    move along seasponge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    nothing to see here
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Surferbruce
    i actually prefer alu for my geared road bikes. stiff, light, inexpensive. i figure in a couple-few years they're gonna be replaced(read: out of date) anyway. now for my fixed gear bike(s) it's more about aesthetics and feel. timeless stuff. my lugged pinarello sits on one end, my new cervelo on the other side.
    how does a bike go out of date?

  15. #15
    Matthew Grimm / Flunky Kogswell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    656
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donotpanic
    everyone seems to be all about steel, lugged track frames and scoffs at the idea of aluminum frames but no one can tell me why. durability vs. weight? are aluminum frames not as durable (even these days)? do lugged frames spread out the stress on the welds more?

    Just playing devil's advocate.

    Aluminum gets used in frames because it is easy to weld in production settings. You can literally crank out more frames using ALU than using steel.

    The krazy part is that it is only marginally cheaper. So it only makes sense for high-volume runs.

    ALU is also perceived as being lighter. So that lead to its adoption as a marketing tool. And welded ALU has its own aesthetic that looks good on suspension frames. So for frames where cost needs to be low and where suspension provides the ride quality and where the industrial quality of big, ugly welds adds to the macho look of a frame, TIG'd ALU works.

    In hardtail frames, the only components that have any free range of motion are the fork blades. The rest of the frame is one big cantilevered truss. So if you ride a hardtail (built of ALU or steel) that feels good, it's the fork.

    For really low cost production, like bikes for kids, steel is used. But that's a whole different story.

    Lugs are interesting because their use has come full circle. They pre-date the development of shielded arc welding. And now they are the best way to join thin-walled, heat treated steel tubes; the amount of heat needed to make a good silver soldered joint is very low. What's old is new again.

    And in the single/fixed segment, the minimalist nature of steel seems to work well.

    And in regards to the durability of lugged frames, I'll quote the dean of the lugged school, e-richie:

    …if you try to do destructive testing in the true meaning of the term, the lugged frame will last longer. However, by the time you've wrecked the former, the latter will be on it's way too.

  16. #16
    LF for the accentdeprived
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    3,550
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Alu is lighter. Full stop. A very high-tech butted steel frame can be lighter than a thick-ass straight-tube Al frame, of course, but among comparable frames Al is quite a bit lighter. And that does matter. To me, it certainly does. Aluminium is good. Not that I wouldn't give away both my Al bikes for a Ti frame
    Quote Originally Posted by dutret
    Do you deny that you are clueless or do you just think that "moron" didn't need to be tacked on there?
    Bike on flickr and on FGG

  17. #17
    Senior Member Surferbruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles/Aveyron France
    Posts
    5,308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    a bike doesn't really go out of date, but compare bikes from 5 years ago and frame materials and components have changed a lot. scandium(and carbon of course), 10 speed, threadless stems, wheel technology, etc. it's why i can't see paying 6-8k for a bike when it's gonna be yesterdays news in a couple years. i love steel and vintage bikes, but i like my geared roadie machines to be current.

  18. #18
    irrational devotion InVeloVeritas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Waterloo, ON
    My Bikes
    SoBe hardtail, GF Cake, Trek 1200, "Italian Cruiser", Ishwata Aerosteel (Fixed), Fetish Cycles Position (track)
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just to make a point: both steel and aluminum fatigue, the difference being the latter does not have an endurance limit (meaning it will weaken until it fails). Steel will do the same if the minimum fatigue strength is less than the loads you apply to it. So.... frame designers use more material to guarentee that in it's weakest state the frame won't fail in regular use. This makes a robust, but heavy steel frame.

    I think a lot of the percieved ride quality comes from the frame constuction more than the materials. Aluminum has a high specific stiffness allowing designers to opt for large diameter, thin wall tubes. These large moment of area tubes create a really rigid structure adding to the "sharpness" or "resposiveness" of the frame.

    Steel, on the other hand does not boast this quality, and hence requires thicker wall tubes to maintain structural integrity. In order to keep weight under control (4130/cuft=488lb, 6061/cuft=165lb) frame designers are forced to keep the OD small. This decreases the stiffness of the tube, creating a more compliant "smooth" or "noodly" feel, depending on your opinion.

    Now, if only we could hydroform some some martensitic tubing for the bike industry, then you'd have a light, super stiff steel ride

    I guess it really boils down to preference and priorities. My hardtail racer is aluminum (and with beautifully smooth TIG welds, btw, on par with some of the fillet brazing work I've seen), while my commuter fixing is steel. I like the smoothness on the road and I like the snappy power and responsiveness of the Al in the woods. To each his own. I don't think you'll see either disappear from the market.

  19. #19
    Skidmaster teadoggg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    don walker, redline, TBD
    Posts
    1,627
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i love aluminum. always have, always will. my cannondale rocks my body and I love it.

    screw fatigue. when it breaks, I'll buy another one.

  20. #20
    Matthew Grimm / Flunky Kogswell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    656
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Scot (Ibis) Nicol put together this little gem on frame materials:

    http://www2.sjsu.edu/orgs/asmtms/artcle/articl.htm



    Spartans!

  21. #21
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Of course Al doesn't corrode as readily as steel, that's not unimportant for many people.

    The thing that steel has going for it, hands down, is durability. As others have noted, it can be dented or dinged without concern, if it cracks those tend to grow more slowly, it can be readily and safely repaired. Some say it rides better and others don't notice.

    The things working against it are corrosion and weight. Reynolds 953, anyone?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •