Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Reverend
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    My Bikes
    2005 Trek 2100, Iro Angus Fixed Gear
    Posts
    530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    How do I decide on my crank length?

    I am new to fixed gear riding, and I am looking at the IRO Mark V as a first fixie. Anyway, I have been noticing that a lot of fixed gear bikes have shorter cranks than stndard road racing bikes. I am 6'0 and ride a 175 mm. How should I decide what size I want to ride?
    2005 Trek 2100
    IRO Angus

    Check out my music: www.myspace.com/thereverend

  2. #2
    Armageddon wasted.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Leucadia, CA
    My Bikes
    Cinelli 84, Masi 83, Bareknuckle, GT Mach 1
    Posts
    244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're riding a 175 you run the risk of clipping an inside pedal on a turn. A friend was badly injured this way! Shorter cranks will lose you a bit of torque, but keep you out of the hospital. May I suggest 165s, or 170s with yer pedals filed down (or track pedals).

  3. #3
    無くなった HereNT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sci-Fi Wasabi
    My Bikes
    I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Shorter crank arms are better for avoiding pedal strike. On the conversion I'm riding now, I have 175s and big huge BMX platforms. I've never had a problem with pedal strike on it, so I don't know how much of an issue it really is... I've used 165, 171, and 175 on fixies and never really noticed a difference...

    I think it's all pretty much personal preferance.

  4. #4
    live free or die trying humancongereel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    where i lay my head is home.
    My Bikes
    bianchi pista workhorse, cannondale r1000, mountain bike fixed conversion
    Posts
    6,999
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you don't lean into turns much you might be okay. but i'd go with 170s. 172.5 if you want that extra 2.5...heh. but yeah, also go with clipless pedals. since they don't stick out as much, they greatly reduce the chance of pedal strike. nowadays, even on my geared road bike i pedal around corners, and with 172.5 cranks and clipless, i haven't had any problems. 175 might be asking for trouble, though.

  5. #5
    Reverend
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    My Bikes
    2005 Trek 2100, Iro Angus Fixed Gear
    Posts
    530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok, I will look for something smaller. For learning, I will use track pedals/clips and then possibly go to clipless after I am more comfortable on the machine.
    2005 Trek 2100
    IRO Angus

    Check out my music: www.myspace.com/thereverend

  6. #6
    The Red Lantern Rev.Chuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    5,967
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Shorter is good for your spin, if you are using for winter training as well as reducing the chance of clipping(Which is very not pretty)
    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
    Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.

    I am in the woods and I have gone crazy.

  7. #7
    如果你能讀了這個你講中文 genericbikedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,542
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^Good for spin and makes it easier to use a smaller gear. the difference between 165 and 170 in my opinion is about 4-5 gear inches.

  8. #8
    live free or die trying humancongereel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    where i lay my head is home.
    My Bikes
    bianchi pista workhorse, cannondale r1000, mountain bike fixed conversion
    Posts
    6,999
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev.Chuck
    Shorter is good for your spin, if you are using for winter training as well as reducing the chance of clipping(Which is very not pretty)
    the one time i did that, my seat nearly took out my boys. instead, i just ended up with a strange cut on my inner thigh. not to mention skinned up where i hit the road, but i was pretty concerned with the guys down there at the time.

  9. #9
    kill -9 1337 Revit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    My Bikes
    old raleigh conversion
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cmcenroe
    I am new to fixed gear riding, and I am looking at the IRO Mark V as a first fixie. Anyway, I have been noticing that a lot of fixed gear bikes have shorter cranks than stndard road racing bikes. I am 6'0 and ride a 175 mm. How should I decide what size I want to ride?
    the height of ur bottom bracket too, i mean mine is 175 and i barely strike, although it is quite scary

    just be careful

  10. #10
    The Red Lantern Rev.Chuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    5,967
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have pedaled down a couple of times. It is pretty spooky, throwing the whole bike into the air. Kinda like the first time you forget to keep spinning and the bike tries to toss you over the bars.
    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
    Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.

    I am in the woods and I have gone crazy.

  11. #11
    ... tlupfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    q factor is equally important to pedal strike and almost never mentioned. kids running around with 165mm bmx cranks aren't much* better off than someone with tight** 175mm road cranks.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Placid Casual's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    942
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you measure from below the balls, it's cheating.

    Now, what's all this about q factor?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    dallas
    My Bikes
    busted trek510, hotrock mt bike, iro angus
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i've clipped my shoe in clips with 165 mm cranks so ymmv

  14. #14
    ... tlupfer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Placid Casual
    If you measure from below the balls, it's cheating.

    Now, what's all this about q factor?
    the further your pedal is from the center of the bike the less the angle of lean will have to be for it to hit the ground. example--tilt your bike slightly to the side and imagine your crankarm is 1/2" further from the center of the bike.

  15. #15
    Lunigma
    Guest
    it's easier to spin down hills with shorter cranks. it's kinda like the difference between swinging your arms in big circles and swinging them in small circles.

    a lot of clipless pedals keep your feet really close to the frame, this makes it easier to pedal and makes it easier to corner.

    not many cranks mention q factor, but i have found that usualy when they do, it's cause it's a low q factor, which is good. i would stay away from bmx and mountain bike cranks if you want better cornering/q factor. when the cranks are really far away like those found on cranks with triples it's almost like your walking bow-legged.

    you should read what sheldon brown has to say about fixies. im pretty sure this is addressed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •