Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29
  1. #1
    Barbieri Telefonico huhenio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    My Bikes
    Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger
    Posts
    3,522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Fixed gear advantages - beyond "anecdata"

    This past weekend I rode with a friend who was sporting an abundantly geared road bike. It was not a race by any means, but it was interesting to see him drop like a brick when terrain got a little steep. The only time I had a problem keeping up with him was on a slight downhill over 22 mph ... but not a real difference.

    He was riding on a Felt (lighter than my Schwinn) with 23 mm tires, and I was riding my monstrosity Scwhinn conversion with 32 mm tires. Rolling resistance was on his side, weight was on his side, and even fitness level was on his side ... yet I observed that his percieved effort increase was substantially greater than mine on the said uphill sections of the ride.

    1) Other than the PDF on "Holomonic ... " in the FGG, does anyone has access to an actual study of the advantages of FG over multigear in a controled environment?

    2) ... or is it impossible to measure by the common layman, and I have just to enjoy the ride and stop asking stupid questions?

    3) Would be possible to do a team ride riding fixed and hanging with my geared friends, so they can draft me on the uphills and downhils, whilst I would be drafting them on the flats? Agreed that I have to train a lot to be at their level, or would it be a useless endeavor?

    Flame on
    Giving Haircuts Over The Phone

  2. #2
    cxmagazine dot com pitboss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    WI
    My Bikes
    Titus road, Fort CX
    Posts
    8,270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    your answer lies within this URL:

    http://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/
    Deathlap - cyclocross, training, beer,...escape hatch

  3. #3
    Barbieri Telefonico huhenio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    My Bikes
    Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger
    Posts
    3,522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I said beyond anecdotal data .... geez.
    Giving Haircuts Over The Phone

  4. #4
    we're here, we steer!! mrRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,412
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    beware!! pdf link. A Theory of Holonomic Scleronomous Gyrators, or The Virtues of Riding Fixed

    http://www.fixedgeargallery.com/articles/lee/lee.pdf

  5. #5
    cxmagazine dot com pitboss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    WI
    My Bikes
    Titus road, Fort CX
    Posts
    8,270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by huhenio
    I said beyond anecdotal data .... geez.
    If you actually look around here, there are contributors to a lot of websites that show this "proof" you are searching for (Sheldon Brown, Ceya, Tomity are three good examples of people with a wealth of knowledge on fixed gear. Some of the frame builders in here may be able to shed more light on your quest too)

    Bike Forums SS/FG = Pudding, look deep. The proof is here

    Read through the threads. There is a variety of non-anecdotal info - and your question has come up before. Plus, the Search is half the fun.
    Deathlap - cyclocross, training, beer,...escape hatch

  6. #6
    we're here, we steer!! mrRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,412
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Above article copied and pasted so you don't have to open the PDF.

    A Theory of Holonomic Scleronomous Gyrators,
    or
    The Virtues of Riding Fixed
    by
    James Bernard Lee
    Portland, Oregon
    Prepared for
    1st International Fixed Gear Symposium
    Traverse City, Michigan
    August 2005

    If it’s broken, fix it.

    My first local fixed gear street ride on FGG 2219 was a
    familiar route, in a 66 inch gear. Climb like that in 66
    inches? Must be some mistake! So I re-rode the route in my
    nice 27 speed Campy equipped road machine...yes, 44 inch gear
    for the same climbing ability as the fixer!
    Now Dick DiGennaro, Mr. Solo Velo, who had built the frame
    and persuaded me to try riding fixed on street and road, is a
    very nice guy. Besides being a master frame builder he works
    every day with crazy physicists at Lawrence Berkeley
    Laboratory, which is why we get along well. To return some
    part of the great favor he had shown me I decided to work out
    the peculiar and perplexing physics of fixing. It took two
    years of meditating on the subtleties of classical mechanics
    to ascertain a set of simple truths:
    All cyclists are biomechanical gyrators. Fixed gear bicycles
    operate under a scleronomous holonomic constraint. Free gear
    bicycles operate under a rheonomous holonomic constraint.
    Gibberish, yes, but here are two real examples:
    Watch Lance climb out of the saddle: he jackhammers the
    bottom of the stroke just as every tyro does; this is because
    human anatomy of itself cannot rotate the cranks at constant
    angular velocity. The presence of a free wheel in the drive
    train allows this by decoupling the forward rotation of the
    rear wheel from the forward rotation of the cranks. The
    effect is not so apparent when the rider is seated, but
    riding a freebie, seated or standing, a roadie’s--or anyone
    else’s--legs cannot catch up to the rear wheel until the
    leading crank is about at two o’clock.
    Then watch world class trackies, say the Uruguayan Olympic
    team at Alpenrose Velodrome in 2004: their smooth loping
    cadence is perfectly even, seated or standing, because their
    cranks always are synchronized with the rear wheel; there is
    no dead spot at the top and bottom of their stroke.
    This is a very big deal!
    It means that the fix rider can apply force to the crank
    wherever she or he chooses, and the human system of optimal
    adaptive control soon will figure out how best to do so. The
    fix rider can get into the power stroke at 12 o’clock, or a
    little before, and so utilize the entire downward stroke for
    propulsion. Way strong!
    The free rider can apply downward force beginning only at two
    o’clock, and so has wasted fully one-third of the downward
    stroke. This is not good!
    Looked at the other way, the fixer has a 50% longer power
    stroke than the freebie, which equates to 50% more torque
    and therefore 50% more power at a given cadence.
    I’m all steamed up.
    There is another effect working here.
    A cyclist’s legs operate like the two opposed pistons of a
    steam locomotive: both generate greater forces at lower
    speeds, and maximum force at “stall,” or zero revs.
    As a fixed gear rider begins to climb he or she necessarily
    slows, and so can apply more force to the cranks. But at
    some speed the knee joints protest, and then the rider rises
    out of the saddle; this is less efficient than being seated,
    but more forceful. Given the 50% torque advantage of riding
    fixed, one can climb grades with surprising ease and
    quickness this way. Of course a lower gear allows one to
    climb a steeper grade either seated or standing; this is a
    matter of terrain and ability for every rider.
    But a free gear rider has a necessary decision upon beginning
    to climb that we fixers do not: way down in torque, she or he
    wants to shift to a lower gear, usually several times; the
    tendency is to chase lower and lower gears, because the lower
    gearing is more than offset by the decreasing torques at the
    higher cadence after each shift. Therefore she or he applies
    progressively less force to the road and continues to slow.
    This process stops only when the rider’s cadence has slowed
    enough to regain useful torque in some lower gear; depending
    upon the grade, that gear can be far removed from the initial
    gear.
    (Trained road-racers know about this trap: when beginning an
    ascent they shift up a cog or two and stand, staying in the
    big ring; when reaching terminal speed they sit, shift to the
    small ring and climb efficiently--but not so smoothly and
    easily as a fixer in a considerably higher gear.)
    Loss of a third of one’s power stroke is a big price to pay
    for fitting a free wheel! So if one fits a free wheel one
    needs lots of gears, and needs to know how to use them
    effectively. I estimate that a single fixed gear is the
    equivalent of three or four widely spaced gears on a generic
    freebie, and about six or seven gears on a close ratio road
    setup.
    Racing fixed?
    Fixers rule on the track because they are faster when geared
    appropriately for restricted circumstances. Specifically,
    their 50% torque advantage means 50% greater acceleration in
    the appropriate gear, and acceleration is nearly everything
    in track racing.
    Fixers would be great for criterium racing too, if it were
    not for those nasty pedal strikes in tight corners. The
    field likely would not complete a single lap, much to the
    consternation of riders and promoters!
    Not good at all for road racing, where slow ascents must be
    followed by blazing descents. But if the speed range on any
    day of a stage race were not great the fixer’s high and wide
    torque range could conquer a multitude of conditions. Might
    be good for time trials, especially team time trials, for
    pace lines would be easier to maintain and probably faster
    too.
    Early every summer in Portland we have six weeks of racing on
    a closed course at Mount Tabor, a (very old) local volcano:
    137 feet of climb and descent for each 1.3 mile lap. The
    descent is continuous for 3/4 mile, followed by a short flat
    straight, a 4.3% climb, a very short flat straight, and a
    7.5% climb. As the only tight turn is at the top of the 7.5%
    grade and so is very slow, pedal strikes are not a problem
    and the venue is suitable for racing fixed, which we do for
    four laps at the beginning of each weekly session.
    There are several really strong fixers (I not one) whose laps
    are in the 3:05-3:30 range, which is about the same as the
    Cat 1-2 riders later in the evening. The freebies clearly
    are faster on the descent, which means that the fixers are
    faster on the climbs. The strong guys ride about 75 inch
    gears, climbing the lesser grade seated, standing on the
    steeper grade, and spinning 150 revs or more downhill.
    Fixing the rest:
    The same high torque and wide range of the fixed gear that
    make it a viable racer for certain events, even on the road,
    make it a more than viable utility bike as a daily driver on
    the street. As a daily driver it simply is the best!
    After all, few of us ascend long steep grades, speed along in
    a peleton, and make harrowingly fast descents on our daily
    grinds. Even if ordinary riders knew how to operate 20 or 30
    speed machines, only 5 or 6 would be useful to them, for
    which a planetary hub shifter is more than adequate and much
    easier to work.
    Most street riding is at 10-15 mi/hr, which on a fixer with a
    63 inch gear means cadences of 60-90 rev/min. This just the
    “sweet spot” for smooth spinning, easy climbing, and great
    acceleration. Once one gets the hang of riding fixed on the
    street it actually is much easier and more convenient all
    around. And there is the bonus of exquisite control at low
    speed: one can control one’s position as well as one’s speed.
    What do those horrid words in the title mean?
    “Gyrator:”
    This is akin to an electrical “transformer,” which converts
    one cyclic voltage into another cyclic voltage, and one
    cyclic current into another cyclic current; proportionality
    is determined by the numbers of windings on the primary and
    secondary; higher voltage always means lower current, and
    vice-versa.
    But a gyrator converts a cyclic voltage into a proportional
    cyclic current, and vice-versa; for example, a garden variety
    electrodynamic loudspeaker converts the cyclic voltage from
    an amplifier into an acoustic current, or “volume velocity”.
    (Gyrators are very tricky to analyze, which is why it is hard
    to design good loudspeakers.)
    A bicycle converts the cyclic forces from our leg muscles
    into progressive speed, so it is only a “quasi-gyrator,” and
    let’s leave it at that.
    Except! Ever thought about how big, how really really big,
    the crank torques on a bicycle can be? I weigh 170 pounds,
    so when I stand on a 6 inch crank arm in the horizontal
    position I produce 85 pound-feet of torque. This is about
    the same as the engine of a Harley-Davidson, or even a small
    car! We produce our torques at low speed, and so do not
    generate much power; an internal combustion engine produces
    its torques at very high speed and so generates much more
    power.
    An internal combustion piston engine must be geared down to
    generate useful torque at the road, and even then needs some
    kind of clutch to get its load moving, for it has zero torque
    at zero speed.
    We gear our bikes up to get useful speeds from our very
    strong but slowly moving legs. And because, like steam
    locomotives, our greatest torque is at zero speed, we need no
    clutch at all.
    Unless we need to shift gears, and who would want to do that?
    (Archibald Sharp, who designed a two speed fixer, with a
    neutral for coasting, in 1896, that’s who.)
    “Scleronomous:”
    According to Cornelius Lanczos (who got it from Ludwig
    Boltzmann) a “scleronomous kinematic condition,” or
    “constraint,” is one that does not involve time. In our case
    it simply means that our fixed gears require the cranks to
    rotate at constant speed throughout one complete cycle.
    Unless the rear wheel is accelerating or decelerating, which
    causes the cranks to slowly follow suit.
    (“Rhenomous” describes the opposite kinematic condition, in
    which the cranks are determined to rotate at varying speed
    during a complete cycle. Here the constraint is imposed not
    by the mechanics of the bicycle but by the physiology of the
    rider.)
    “Holonomic:”
    If our wheels roll on a surface without slipping they obey a
    holonomic constraint, able to move only forward or backward.
    (But if a ball rolls on a surface without slipping its motion
    is non-holonomic, because it can move in any direction.) All
    bicycles are holonomic unless something nasty has happened.
    A few more words on stroking!
    I noted above that fitting a freewheel means one needs more
    gears, because the power stroke is much shorter. Fast
    roadies learn to pull back at the bottom of the stroke to
    extend it a little; this works, for one can feel the bike
    accelerate slightly in response. But there is little more
    one can do to improve what is fundamentally a short stroke,
    so the stroke tends to change little and one modulates speed
    by changing gears. This is basically mechanical modulation.
    Also I said that the fixed rider learns to modulate the
    stroke in response to changing conditions. I am not certain
    how we do this: do we keep the longest possible stroke and
    modulate the force; do we use a constant force and modulate
    the length of the stroke? Probably a mixture of both. In
    casual riding on the street I feel that I am modulating the
    length of the stroke while keeping the force pretty much
    constant, but I really would like to get the opinions of
    other fixers on this matter.
    A coach at Alpenrose Velodrome taught me that the best way to
    finish off a power stroke is to drop the heel at the bottom.
    This is just the opposite of finishing the stroke on a
    freebie, but it has a similar effect, causing a noticeable
    acceleration.
    I think it is this direct physiological modulation of power
    to the bicycle which is at the core of the feeling that
    riding fixed is simply an wonderful extension of the rider:
    the intimate cyclist!
    A modest dissent:
    As a cyclist and a physicist I am dismayed that I have been
    required to do all this! After all, the bicycle has been
    around for well more than a century and many smarter riders
    than I have thought about its propulsion.
    Near the beginning there was the redoubtable Archibald Sharp.
    Now there is Mike Burrows. Both Brits, and both well worth
    reading.
    I cannot in good faith recommend other authors, for many seem
    to violate my basic principle of physics: do not worry about
    what is happening in the second decimal place until you
    understand what is happening in the first! There are
    infinitudes of disquisitions upon the niceties of the pedal
    stroke, and further infinitudes of odd mechanical devices
    portending to optimize it. But has anyone ever delimited the
    gross difference between the stroke of a fixer and the stroke
    of a freebie?
    Particularly I am perturbed by what many consider the
    cannonical work in the field: “Bicycling Science,” by Whitt
    and Wilson, in its several editions. Books of this sort
    address the extreme aspects of competitive cycling as if such
    were the chief interest of all of us. Certainly less than 5%
    of the world’s cyclists race. 95% care only about safe,
    efficient, and comfortable transportation.
    Read Whitt and Wilson if you wish to enter HPV competitions.
    There are many other books if you wish to train for racing.
    An essential disclaimer:
    Racers and HPV people are interested in generation and
    application of high power over artifically defined distances
    and times. Whitt and Wilson and their ilk address this
    problem admirably, but treat the subject of development of
    torque tangentially, if at all. But it is torque, not power,
    that determines how a bicycle is built, why it works as it
    does, and ultimately, how it is ridden!
    Dick DiGennaro and I agree that a graph of torque versus
    cadence begins high at zero cadence and decreases to zero at
    some cadence above 100 rev/min that depends upon the ability
    of the rider. We also agree that it is not a straight line.
    But we have no solid experimental evidence for its actual
    shape. So crucial parts of this discussion are based on
    “anecdata.”
    I would very much like to see good experiments that measure
    torque versus cadence for fixed gear and freewheel bicycles
    under well controlled conditions.
    A couple of final minor points: a rear brake reduces stresses
    on the knees; a fixer’s chain wears more quickly because it’s
    always moving and routinely transmits larger forces.
    Enough said!
    ©
    James Bernard Lee
    2005

  7. #7
    hell's angels h/q e3st ny brunop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    boston area/morningside heights manhattan
    My Bikes
    surly steamroller, independent fabrication titanium club racer, iro jamie roy--44/16, independent fabrication steel crown jewel--47/17, surly karate. monkey (rohloff speed hub), unicycle
    Posts
    1,582
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    gosh. i rock fixed cause it's cool. i didn't know all this. i will never get on a freewheel bike again. ever.

  8. #8
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I only get dropped going downhill.
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  9. #9
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The above theory is completely bogus. If you do a little searching, you can find some analysis from the first time it went around.

    As for whether or not you can hang with roadies...sure, so long as the terrain isn't too extreme, you'll do fine.

  10. #10
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,933
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride with a geared club and have no problems as routes are basically flat. But I don't take the fixed on serious hill climb routes, long and occasionally steep climbs where I need to stand up in 38:25 in the steepest places and we hit 45mph downhill. My top speed on fixed so far is 33mph downhill, so I can get dropped on downhills, but I've been able to maintain 28-30mph pacelines on the flats OK.

    As far as advantages? I don't find riding fixed to be much different than geared. Main advantage is that it is easier to ride steady and maintain an even following distance in a paceline when fixed.

    Al

  11. #11
    robots in disguise beppe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Baghdad-by-the-Bay
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bostontrevor
    The above theory is completely bogus. If you do a little searching, you can find some analysis from the first time it went around.

    As for whether or not you can hang with roadies...sure, so long as the terrain isn't too extreme, you'll do fine.
    ^^^ Agreed.

  12. #12
    domestique squeakywheel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    off the back
    Posts
    2,005
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by huhenio
    fitness level was on his side
    Bad assumption. You kicked his a$$ inspite of his bike's mechanical advantage because you are a stronger rider.

  13. #13
    Cornucopia of Awesomeness baxtefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    not where i used to be
    Posts
    4,847
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by beppe
    ^^^ Agreed.
    thirded.
    sounds like he's got some poor pedaling technique.
    {o,o**
    |)__)
    -"-"-

    O RLY?

  14. #14
    aspiring dirtbag commuter max-a-mill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    philly
    Posts
    2,116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    huhenio - you have a bigger motor and therefore kicked his @ss. that guy may ride more than you, but he wouldn't have trouble keeping up on a light roadie if he was as fit as you.

    i couldn't keep up with you fixed, geared, whatever... and i bet i ride more than you.
    - the revolution will not be motorized -

  15. #15
    Barbieri Telefonico huhenio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    My Bikes
    Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger
    Posts
    3,522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bostontrevor
    The above theory is completely bogus. If you do a little searching, you can find some analysis from the first time it went around.

    As for whether or not you can hang with roadies...sure, so long as the terrain isn't too extreme, you'll do fine.
    Finnaly someone is reading the question! Thanks Trev ....


    For all others that did not get the hint : no anecdata and no "Holomonic" paper. I already read a bunch of those.

    Maybe I should go ahead and ask the Mythbusters about it.
    Giving Haircuts Over The Phone

  16. #16
    Barbieri Telefonico huhenio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    My Bikes
    Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger
    Posts
    3,522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by max-a-mill
    huhenio - you have a bigger motor and therefore kicked his @ss. that guy may ride more than you, but he wouldn't have trouble keeping up on a light roadie if he was as fit as you.

    i couldn't keep up with you fixed, geared, whatever... and i bet i ride more than you.
    I guess that the old adage holds true then ... it is about the rider and not so much the bike.

    Anyhow ... riding on my hills on the fixed gear is somewhat making me stronger. I wonder how much the 35 pound hybrid helped on this phenomena to happen.
    Giving Haircuts Over The Phone

  17. #17
    King of the Hipsters
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Pista
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I commute 13.5 miles one way, with an 800' gain and loss, and I can do it faster and easier on my fixed gear bike than on my geared bike.
    Additionally, I enjoy much greater control and balance with my fixed gear.
    Anecdotal, I know.
    Possibly all psychological: we do best that which we enjoy.

    The town in which I ride reportedly has the highest percentage of Olympians and professional athletes of any community in America.
    I see world class bicyclists all the time.
    I have only seen one other fixed gear rider, and only briefly, in all these years, and not an athlete but a recreational rider like myself.
    So, what about these world class riders who allegedly train on fixies in the off season?
    I haven't seen one.

  18. #18
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  19. #19
    Dog is my co-pilot 2manybikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    My Bikes
    2 many
    Posts
    13,732
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The part about using more of the circle as a power stroke is totally correct, just like the difference between a 2 cycle and a 4 cycle engine. The four stroke has more of the crank revolutions coasting doing intake and exhaust, than the two stroke that has only 50 % of the revolution not producing as much power. It is also why a four stroke motorcycle has better traction on a loose surface than a two stroke. There is power applied to a lower percentage of the crank revolutions. Two equal horsepower motorcycles side by side on the dirt, the four stroke will get way ahead of a two stroke in an aceleration contest.

    It is easily demonstrated with a freewheel bike by just changing how much of the crank circle you power through. The bike goes faster or accelerates more if you use more of the stroke.

    If the gearing is exactly equal to the free bike the fixie has more power AVAILABLE if you know how to pedal that way. Some do, some don't, the fixie tends to teach you. But not everyone gets it. Plus it's harder to do, you are using more power too. This is one of the benefits of a smooth pedal stroke, but it is not usually explained in a way that others can understand. It gets lost in translation.

    The higher torque at zero rpm just like a steam engine is totally correct too.
    Last edited by 2manybikes; 12-19-05 at 08:24 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  20. #20
    consistent inconsistency habitus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    789
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Cox
    I commute 13.5 miles one way, with an 800' gain and loss
    that's serious business, ken. seriously.

    i thought my (one-way) commute was hilly--about 300' in 3 miles.
    every scar has a story

  21. #21
    I need more bikes!!! Mr. Shadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Durham, NC
    My Bikes
    2 roadies, 7 fixed-gears, 1 hardtail, 1 full suspension mtb, and 1 hybrid...so far.
    Posts
    472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Fixer
    I only get dropped going downhill.
    I've kept up with roadies on some really nice bikes...hitting 36 mph on one occasion.
    That was running a 44/16 (75") and spinning over 150 rpms. They said I was "spinning like a madman."
    "We are few now, but one day we will rule." That's what one of my fixies whispered as I walked by. I nodded in agreement, and thanked it for not waking the others.

  22. #22
    Barbieri Telefonico huhenio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    My Bikes
    Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger
    Posts
    3,522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Shadow
    I've kept up with roadies on some really nice bikes...hitting 36 mph on one occasion.
    That was running a 44/16 (75") and spinning over 150 rpms. They said I was "spinning like a madman."
    Try unclipping .... it works well on the downhills
    Giving Haircuts Over The Phone

  23. #23
    this bike is an aqueduct Matthew A Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    My Bikes
    Villin custom touring, Medici Pro Pista, KHS Alite1000, Windsor fixed commuter
    Posts
    1,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Adam Kell once biked with me from Gainesville to St Augustine on his pursuit frame. Fixed, no brakes. He'd unclip on the big downhills, feet pressed against the fork. Eighty-five miles in a day. Pretty impressive.

    Search fixed in the touring forum.... people have done PBP/BMB/crazy **** on fixed so there's no reason to think it'd be any "less" efficient....

    I've been drinking slightly, apologies....


    Maybe triathlon stuff? Those guys study all sortsa **** in labs and windtunnels n'****. Like, yr more aero with a camelbak, etc. Wonder if anyone's done a tri on a fixie?

    etc
    Villin custom touring | Raleigh XXIX | Medici Pro Pista | 1978 Schwinn Stingray

  24. #24
    72 & Sunny adamkell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    '93 Yamaguchi Pursuit track bike, Alan Super Record
    Posts
    1,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew A Brown
    blah blah blah pursuit frame. blah blah blah

    Pretty impressive.
    or dumb...

    I had a perfectly nice, cushy-riding Alan at home that just needed some clamp-on shifters. But 8 (?) months later, that Alan is still proppped up in a corner of my bathroom.

    Anecdata!

  25. #25
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Man, 150 is just getting started!

    But BMB fixed is no joke.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •