View Poll Results: what is the gear-inches measurement of your fixed-gear road-use bike?
below 59
2
1.03%
59-64
1
0.51%
64-68
12
6.15%
68-71
42
21.54%
71-74
50
25.64%
74-77
42
21.54%
77-81
23
11.79%
81-85
16
8.21%
85-90
3
1.54%
above 90
4
2.05%
Voters: 195. You may not vote on this poll
what's your fixed gear inches for use on road?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
This poll is specifically for fixed-gear bikes that are mainly ridden on roads. Freewheeling, and off-road use, throw in other major variables that I don't want this poll to have to deal with. (Of course, there are other variables, such as the terrain in which someone rides, and the cadence that they like to spin. A bigger gear doesn't necessarily mean that someone is a stronger cyclist. But, on average, it does.)
Gear inches takes your wheel size and gear ratio (e.g., 42/15) into account. Basically, gear inches measures your gear as if it were equivalent to the size of a high-wheeled bicycle. It's your gear ratio multiplied by the diameter of your rear wheel.
To calculate yourself:
(rear wheel's diameter at outside of tire) * (# chainring teeth) / (# teeth on cog)
So for my bike, with 27x1 1/4 tires (27.075" outside diameter), and a 40/15 chainring/cog combination, the gear inches is 72.2.
You can also use Sheldon's calculator to figure out your bike's gear inches.
Make sure to set the standard to "gear inches" not "gain ratio" which takes cranklength into account.
Note that the categories of the poll are endpoints. So, 71.1 would go in the "71-74" category, not in the 68-71 category. If you have an exact number (unlikely) go to the larger category.
If you have multiple fixed-gear bikes, or a flip-flop double-fixed hub, vote for the bike or gear that you use most frequently.
Gear inches takes your wheel size and gear ratio (e.g., 42/15) into account. Basically, gear inches measures your gear as if it were equivalent to the size of a high-wheeled bicycle. It's your gear ratio multiplied by the diameter of your rear wheel.
To calculate yourself:
(rear wheel's diameter at outside of tire) * (# chainring teeth) / (# teeth on cog)
So for my bike, with 27x1 1/4 tires (27.075" outside diameter), and a 40/15 chainring/cog combination, the gear inches is 72.2.
You can also use Sheldon's calculator to figure out your bike's gear inches.
Make sure to set the standard to "gear inches" not "gain ratio" which takes cranklength into account.
Note that the categories of the poll are endpoints. So, 71.1 would go in the "71-74" category, not in the 68-71 category. If you have an exact number (unlikely) go to the larger category.
If you have multiple fixed-gear bikes, or a flip-flop double-fixed hub, vote for the bike or gear that you use most frequently.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
Last edited by TallRider; 02-23-06 at 09:04 AM.
#5
i am sure that i hate you
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 703
Posts: 3,230
Bikes: 'Cha-ruzu Fosuta Orusan Kein' Fuji Track (2005), Schwinn Tank MTB (?), Fuji Royale (1979)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
84.1 apparently
__________________
putting the pi back in pirate!
putting the pi back in pirate!
It’s an upstanding member of the solar system
Apply the laws of earth and make it a victim
Of Proposition 187
Apply the laws of earth and make it a victim
Of Proposition 187
#7
don't pedal backwards...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 754
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker set up for commuting and loaded touring, old Sekine road frame converted to fixed-gear, various beaters and weird bikes, waiting on the frame for my Surly Big Dummy build
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm currently stuck with either 82.9 or 66.9 with the cog and rings I have on hand. I have parts in the mail hopefully arriving today or tomorrow that will let me run at about 74 or 75 depending on tire size.
(warning: shameless plug ahead)
check out the gearing calculator I'm putting together that is tailored specifically for SS/FG applications. It helps you find gear combinations in a bunch of different ways and also calculates how many skid patches each gear ratio has.
https://grit.homelinux.net/gi/
If you have ideas for improvements, leave a note in this thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/175995-check-out-gear-inch-calculator.html
(warning: shameless plug ahead)
check out the gearing calculator I'm putting together that is tailored specifically for SS/FG applications. It helps you find gear combinations in a bunch of different ways and also calculates how many skid patches each gear ratio has.
https://grit.homelinux.net/gi/
If you have ideas for improvements, leave a note in this thread:
https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/175995-check-out-gear-inch-calculator.html
Last edited by MacG; 02-23-06 at 10:12 AM.
#8
i believe in me
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,712
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i recently went from 78.8 (48x16) to 74.2 (48x17) and i love it! much better for riding around the city in traffic. i feel quite zippy
#10
hullo.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: san francisco
Posts: 1,458
Bikes: 74 paramount track, 80s maruishi track, 70s chesini track.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
50x16 (700cx23) somewhere floating below 82. sanfrancisco has its hills.
#11
shoot up or shut up.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 1,961
Bikes: yes please.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my bianchi is 48:16 for street, 48:14 for track, running 23c tires. my peugeot fixie conversion is 40:15 with 27"x1.25" tires.
#13
Geosynchronous Falconeer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 6,312
Bikes: 2006 Raleigh Rush Hour, Campy Habanero Team Ti, Soma Double Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
48x15. Stock ratio on the Raleigh Rush Hour.
__________________
Bring the pain.
Bring the pain.
#15
Look ma...no brakes!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 399
Bikes: Locally built track bike, Kona mtb, Giant Road Bike, Soon to be Surly LHT Tourer!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
81.0 48x16 165mm
hilly around here so we gta bust ass to get around
hilly around here so we gta bust ass to get around
#17
aka mattio
i like to say this when gearing comes up.
lots of people qualify what they're riding by mentioning hills, as if they need to give a reason why their gearing is low (if indeed it is). it's similar to the FGG "i have a brake but don't use it"/"for the hills" phenomenon.
just ride what you ride. don't worry that somebody might think you're a pansy if you ride 69" with a brake. anybody who would think that is probably a dip****.
lots of people qualify what they're riding by mentioning hills, as if they need to give a reason why their gearing is low (if indeed it is). it's similar to the FGG "i have a brake but don't use it"/"for the hills" phenomenon.
just ride what you ride. don't worry that somebody might think you're a pansy if you ride 69" with a brake. anybody who would think that is probably a dip****.
#18
King Among Runaways
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 4,215
Bikes: 2004 Bianchi Pista, Cannondale Track, Soma Pake, Schwinn Breeze
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just went from 81 (46x15) to 76 (49x17) on my main bike.
The other is 79 (48x16)
The other is 79 (48x16)
__________________
"I owe everyone an apology" - hyperrevue
"I owe everyone an apology" - hyperrevue
#19
awesome
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: urbana / chicago
Posts: 198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
oops, i voted one category too low. 77.42" here. sometimes i wish it was a tad higher, other times i dont. oh well.
#20
Hello.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Seattle
Posts: 2,902
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by queerpunk
i like to say this when gearing comes up.
lots of people qualify what they're riding by mentioning hills, as if they need to give a reason why their gearing is low (if indeed it is). it's similar to the FGG "i have a brake but don't use it"/"for the hills" phenomenon.
just ride what you ride. don't worry that somebody might think you're a pansy if you ride 69" with a brake. anybody who would think that is probably a dip****.
lots of people qualify what they're riding by mentioning hills, as if they need to give a reason why their gearing is low (if indeed it is). it's similar to the FGG "i have a brake but don't use it"/"for the hills" phenomenon.
just ride what you ride. don't worry that somebody might think you're a pansy if you ride 69" with a brake. anybody who would think that is probably a dip****.
i run 70.4 on one of my bikes and 69.3 on 2 of em. one of them is biopace. i like to spin. somebody please come and burn down my house.
#21
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was ridding a 700c35mm tires with a 34x14(66.0) which was great for the C&O Canal, and I was able to do a normal route, but a little slow for Washington DC, and anything pruely flat. I went to a 38x15(68.8) and I like the speed of the gear, but it was not working on a normal route that included some up hills, so I am torn about what to ride, I can go with the 38x15 (I road to work today) and pick special routes that are flat, or the 34x14 and have more choices but a little slower. I am thinkning slower, cause if I want speed I have other bikes.
#22
blah
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 5,573
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by queerpunk
i like to say this when gearing comes up.
lots of people qualify what they're riding by mentioning hills, as if they need to give a reason why their gearing is low (if indeed it is). it's similar to the FGG "i have a brake but don't use it"/"for the hills" phenomenon.
just ride what you ride. don't worry that somebody might think you're a pansy if you ride 69" with a brake. anybody who would think that is probably a dip****.
lots of people qualify what they're riding by mentioning hills, as if they need to give a reason why their gearing is low (if indeed it is). it's similar to the FGG "i have a brake but don't use it"/"for the hills" phenomenon.
just ride what you ride. don't worry that somebody might think you're a pansy if you ride 69" with a brake. anybody who would think that is probably a dip****.
And all this time I thought it was a direct corrolation to the size of my penis. *SIGH*.
#23
Hello.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Seattle
Posts: 2,902
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by onetwentyeight
And all this time I thought it was a direct corrolation to the size of my penis. *SIGH*.