Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Off topic... kinda. Road bike suggestions?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Off topic... kinda. Road bike suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-06, 12:54 AM
  #1  
If you don't look good...
Thread Starter
 
benk0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PHX
Posts: 284

Bikes: 1993 Cannondale Track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Off topic... kinda. Road bike suggestions?

Yeah, send me to the road forum and I'll go...

I was wondering if anyone's riding a geared road bike that shares a similar geometry to a "true" track frame. I'm riding a circa 92 Cannondale and would LOVE something that is as tight as that.

I know NOTHING of road bikes... this would be my first and would like to keep it under $1000. Components don't matter all that much as long as they work well.

Thanks.
benk0 is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 12:58 AM
  #2  
shadybikes
 
jacobpriest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waco/Plano/Dallas/Brooklyn, Texas
Posts: 1,141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fuji Team.
its full ultegra components, which is nice (for me)
Alum. Frame, carbon fork.
Real ****ing comfy and a good bike for the money. Find a used one on Ebay.
(i ride one)
jacobpriest is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 01:39 AM
  #3  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Ultegra is a complete waste of your money. You're only saving yourself a couple hundred grams from your wallet and maybe the gruppo over 105.
operator is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 01:49 AM
  #4  
shadybikes
 
jacobpriest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waco/Plano/Dallas/Brooklyn, Texas
Posts: 1,141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
Ultegra is a complete waste of your money. You're only saving yourself a couple hundred grams from your wallet and maybe the gruppo over 105.
it has different shifters than the 105 that i like a lot better.
jacobpriest is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 01:57 AM
  #5  
So it goes.
 
MDRawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MD/DC
Posts: 257

Bikes: late 80's Pinarello Track, 1988 Proteus Yamaguchi road, 1970's Nishiki fg conversion (stolen and returned!)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
105 is more than just fine....a new 105 bike should be around 1200-1500 so a used bike can be had for under a grand no prob.
MDRawk is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 01:58 AM
  #6  
robots in disguise
 
beppe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baghdad-by-the-Bay
Posts: 305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In terms of tight wheelbases, almost all competition-level road bikes now have them tight enough that 28 are the biggest tires you can run. I think I probably can't run bigger than 25s on my Orbea Lobular.

In terms of high bottom brackets--ha! No.

In terms of seat to bar drop, fork rake, stiffness and the like, you can find what you need, but even track bikes have different specializations for different events.

Cheers.
beppe is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 08:47 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Surferbruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles/Aveyron France
Posts: 5,308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
funny my lbs won't even bother ordering 105 cause ultegra is so close in price.
find an old gios road bike, infamous for super quick handling and steep angles.
my cervelo soloist has a very quick handling front end.
Surferbruce is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 08:51 AM
  #8  
So it goes.
 
MDRawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MD/DC
Posts: 257

Bikes: late 80's Pinarello Track, 1988 Proteus Yamaguchi road, 1970's Nishiki fg conversion (stolen and returned!)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Surferbruce
funny my lbs won't even bother ordering 105 cause ultegra is so close in price.
find an old gios road bike, infamous for super quick handling and steep angles.
my cervelo soloist has a very quick handling front end.
!!! It is $500 more !!!
MDRawk is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 08:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
calculator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 107

Bikes: 1986 Fuji Pulsar, 1975 Motobecane Mirage (in pieces), 1948 Repco "Path Racer" (frame on the way)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gios Compact Pro!



Steel, agressive geometry, and probably more than a grand fully built. But anything Italian and decently high-end should do ya. Look for early 2000s stuff with Ultegra+ or Daytona/Centaur+ groups. I saw a nice Tommasini w/ Daytona 9sp go for around $900 on ebay about a month ago.

Dave
calculator is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 08:52 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tri bikes have forward geometries. TT bikes also though a little less so.

A QR kilo with 105 is a pretty good deal imo
stevo is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 09:01 AM
  #11  
...
 
tlupfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by stevo
tri bikes have forward geometries.
...and 71 degree head tubes optimized for use with aero bars.
tlupfer is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 09:35 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tlupfer
...and 71 degree head tubes optimized for use with aero bars.
72.5, but valid point.
stevo is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 11:08 AM
  #13  
.
 
monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 759

Bikes: Gios track,Miyata roadie, GT mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh god, someone please buy this before I submit an offer:

https://cgi.ebay.com/1984-Gios-Torino...QQcmdZViewItem

please....
monkey is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 11:11 AM
  #14  
MADE IN TAIWAN
 
wangster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SF
Posts: 2,438

Bikes: Tarmac, Humble, Makino, Schwinn

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
under a thousand... best bang for you buck would be either a Giant or a Felt... both has awsome bikes with a good gruppo for around a thousand, depending which model. both has great reviews.
wangster is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 12:04 PM
  #15  
meet the mets
 
chicagoamdream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bucktown, Chicago
Posts: 1,555

Bikes: Raleigh conversion (hours spent making it look like a Pista); Porter Track, Samson Track, Leto Roadie.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by monkey
Oh god, someone please buy this before I submit an offer:

https://cgi.ebay.com/1984-Gios-Torino...QQcmdZViewItem

please....

Nooooooo! Damn you, monkey!

edit: And with a white Turbo?! What are they doing?!
chicagoamdream is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 12:12 PM
  #16  
.
 
monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 759

Bikes: Gios track,Miyata roadie, GT mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chicagoamdream
Nooooooo! Damn you, monkey!
edit: And with a white Turbo?! What are they doing?!
I know exactly what they're doing: killing me.
monkey is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 12:15 PM
  #17  
Yay!11! I has!!!1
 
ImOnCrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastcoast
Posts: 1,659

Bikes: Cocaine the white stallion, Custom Witcomb pista, (Being restored) 80's Pogliaghi Track, (destroyed) RAP Round Breeze NJS, Cannondale Jekyll 900, 84/5 Pinarello Montello (all italian)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by monkey
Oh god, someone please buy this before I submit an offer:

https://cgi.ebay.com/1984-Gios-Torino...QQcmdZViewItem

please....
Hmm... my size and ends on my birthday. Ooh ooh I know what I want...
__________________
Bloodstains, speed kills, fast bikes, cheap thrills, French girls, fine wine...
ImOnCrank is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 01:59 PM
  #18  
jack of one or two trades
 
Aeroplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640

Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by beppe
In terms of tight wheelbases, almost all competition-level road bikes now have them tight enough that 28 are the biggest tires you can run. I think I probably can't run bigger than 25s on my Orbea Lobular.
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but you're talking about tire clearance. Wheelbase is the distance between the hubs.
Aeroplane is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 02:07 PM
  #19  
shoot up or shut up.
 
isotopesope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 1,961

Bikes: yes please.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you're looking for tight road bike handling, try finding criterium specific frames. things to look for are seat and headtube angles and short stays. same things that will give you an idea how a track bike would handle.

my guerciotti handles like a track bike. i'm currently in the market for another road frame... definitely lugged and italian. my guerciotti is a 58, but i should be on a 60 or 61. there is a frame on ebay right now i'm eyeing.
isotopesope is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 02:13 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
rvabiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
$560 for 105, $690 ultegra and free shipping...

https://www.probikekit.com
rvabiker is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 02:28 PM
  #21  
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,760

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 13 Posts
Best advice is just to get out there and start test riding some bikes. All or none of the suggestions given here could work for you.

My guess is that timetrial/triathlon bikes would have the very aggressive geometry of a track bike. I wouldn't want to ride one for a 100 miles.

In your price range, Trek 1200, maybe last year's 1500.

A Lemond Croix de Fer is steel but a bit out of your price range. Traditional road geometry.

What sort of riding do you want the road bike for? What sort of shape are you in? What terrain will you be riding on?
__________________
bbattle is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 02:39 PM
  #22  
or tarckeemoon, depending
 
marqueemoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Posts: 7,017

Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a 90's Davidson Impulse that I like a lot. Very tight and fun to ride. They're handbuilt here in Seattle. This one's on ebay right now with a $850 BIN. A sick deal if you ask me.

marqueemoon is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 03:53 PM
  #23  
>>>>>>>>>
 
msneeri2@hotmai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: philly
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i have a late 80's 59cm Atala that is just as tight as my bareknuckle. slight pedal overlap and evrything. def.lower BB, other than that pretty much the same. i'm thinking it must have had some criterium influence at least. These frames are nice, they are lower-end columbus steel, def. not the lightest, but very comforftable even w/ steep angles. They're pretty cheap, too. frame/fork in good shape shouldn't be more than 250-300 i'd guess.
msneeri2@hotmai is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 04:03 PM
  #24  
robots in disguise
 
beppe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baghdad-by-the-Bay
Posts: 305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but you're talking about tire clearance. Wheelbase is the distance between the hubs.
Sorry, I was being lazy. On road bikes (not tri or tt bikes), you can effectively substitute tire clearance for wheelbase to make things a little easier to visualize. I often do this for people who don't really know what's up but have ridden a lot. I should have been more specific. Thus:

Because UCI makes road bikes have 2 triangles, and because down tubes are almost always at the very bottom of the head tube, you can often effectively eyeball wheelbase by visually adding the space between the rear wheel and the seat tube with the space between the front wheel and the down tube. Using this (unscientific) method, I was including the fact that my bike can't take more than 25s (or maybe, maybe 28s) as a reference for how close the rear wheel is to the seat tube and the front wheel to the down tube.

Again, sorry for the confusion. This is not an exact method, obviously, but I find it's useful for people who are looking but maybe don't have an expert's automatic understanding of the terminology, even if they could deduce it out.
beppe is offline  
Old 03-30-06, 04:23 PM
  #25  
jack of one or two trades
 
Aeroplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640

Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by beppe
Because UCI makes road bikes have 2 triangles, and because down tubes are almost always at the very bottom of the head tube, you can often effectively eyeball wheelbase by visually adding the space between the rear wheel and the seat tube with the space between the front wheel and the down tube. Using this (unscientific) method, I was including the fact that my bike can't take more than 25s (or maybe, maybe 28s) as a reference for how close the rear wheel is to the seat tube and the front wheel to the down tube.

Again, sorry for the confusion. This is not an exact method, obviously, but I find it's useful for people who are looking but maybe don't have an expert's automatic understanding of the terminology, even if they could deduce it out.
I see what you're saying, and it does make sense, kind of. Greater tire clearance will tend to yield a greater wheelbase. But, things like head tube length/angle, fork rake, seat tube angle, and bb drop will affect it just as much, if not more.

Most high-end road bikes have very, very little tire clearance. So do most high-end track bikes. But they still handle differently, and have different wheelbases, geometries, and trail.
Aeroplane is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.