Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Junior Member biciclectic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    the sticks, CA
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bareknuckle Vs. Raleigh Rush Hour Frame geometry

    I am thinking about purchasing a bareknuckle frame via internet, but I need some help with the sizing. I am 5'4" and currently ride a 50 cm raleigh rush hour. According to the some threads posted on here earlier the bareknuckle frames run larger than most of their other bikes. I asked someone from trackstarnyc and the guy said that the frames are similar. Can anyone validate this? Anyones help is appreciated!

  2. #2
    bought a new car $0.00/Gal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bucktown, Chicago
    My Bikes
    01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery
    Posts
    1,346
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've never ridden a rushhour but I've been on 2 bareknuckles within the last week and both felt awesome.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just picked up a bare knuckle frame+fork yesterday, 50cm IM 5'6" and normally ride a 54cm on road bike geometry, the stand over on the BK barely touches my nads, dont know if this helps you any, but, anyhoo...

  4. #4
    WTF?
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    livin' the dream
    My Bikes
    trek cross, gt mtb, khs track
    Posts
    462
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^what's your inseam?

    bareknuckle frames at business cycles.
    rush hour geometry

    all the sizes of the rush hour have the same bb height but the cranks get longer, isn't that weird?
    Last edited by mrbertfixy; 04-26-06 at 03:38 PM.

  5. #5
    Poseur Comatose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, definitely order a size smaller (bareknuckle). I usually ride a 54/56cm, but after I've read the threads about the sizing, I purchased a 52cm and couldn't be happier.

  6. #6
    WTF?
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    livin' the dream
    My Bikes
    trek cross, gt mtb, khs track
    Posts
    462
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    anyone care to share standover height of their bareknuckle? and include the what width tires you're using too.

  7. #7
    bought a new car $0.00/Gal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bucktown, Chicago
    My Bikes
    01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery
    Posts
    1,346
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I usually ride a 54cm and a 50cm bareknuckle fit me.

  8. #8
    Junior Member biciclectic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    the sticks, CA
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have about a 29.5 inseam. I think the consensus says to size down, now i just gotta find someone who carries the yellow in a 48cm. Thanks everyone!

  9. #9
    Junior Member biciclectic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    the sticks, CA
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottMC
    I just picked up a bare knuckle frame+fork yesterday, 50cm IM 5'6" and normally ride a 54cm on road bike geometry, the stand over on the BK barely touches my nads, dont know if this helps you any, but, anyhoo...
    yes this does help I i'm 5'4, the 50 cm just might work for me, but i guess that depends on how low your nads hang.

  10. #10
    TN!
    TN! is offline
    Senior Member TN!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    290
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'm 5 10 and my 54 bareknuckle fits like a glove

  11. #11
    Happy Cycling HexagonSun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SF
    My Bikes
    bareknuckle, bomber pro, 3Rensho SR, nagasawa special
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'm 5'10" and i ride a 52 and it fits great. one of the things you should know about the bareknuckle is that the seat tube is sized center-to-center, so my 52cm is more like 53.5 center to top of seat tube measurement. the 52 also has a 54.5cm top tube, which is why i think many people find the frames to run large for their size. going by the seat tube measurement alone, you may find yourself stretched out too far on the bars because as the frames get smaller, the top tube lengths tend to be proportionally longer. i would suggest a 48. that would give you a 52cm top tube. compare that to your rush hour and determine whether you feel you need a longer or shorter reach to your bars. the seat tube size is less relevant because your seat post is easier to adjust than a stem/steerer tube length.

  12. #12
    Poseur Comatose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbertfixy
    anyone care to share standover height of their bareknuckle? and include the what width tires you're using too.
    31.5" with 23c tires on my 52cm bareknuckle.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Terror_in_pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Custom Holland Ti road bike, Custom track bike I traded a painting for.
    Posts
    2,047
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i dont know if you have yet, but consider overlap. my friend rides a 49-50cm bareknuckle and complains of massive overlap.
    Ode to the after work nap ( ride your bike instead)

    Ode to the nap
    The evil, evil nap
    It lures
    you succumb
    But only with good intent
    Shortly I will rise
    But you do not.
    Do not succumb
    To the evil, evil nap

  14. #14
    Me talk pretty one day. eyefloater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey, TiP:

    The fourth line of your sig is almost completely cut off and unreadable (using Firefox here).

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chi-troit
    My Bikes
    [2004 Bianchi Eros] [1988 Colnago XL Fixed Gear Conversion]
    Posts
    577
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eyefloater
    Hey, TiP:

    The fourth line of your sig is almost completely cut off and unreadable (using Firefox here).
    Hit control - (That's control and the minus key).

  16. #16
    Shadow Member simple312's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn (chicago until july07)
    My Bikes
    bareknuckle fixed, cannondale track, nishiki conversion
    Posts
    189
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i cant compair the bareknuckle vs the rush, but vs my 03 khs flite100...

    bareknuckle is stiffer, slightly lighter. im 6', my khs was a 57cm, my bareknuckle is a 54cm and fits me great. i think i have read that they are sized 3cm shorther than most other frames. so a if you normally ride a 57 get a 54, if you ride a 54 get a 51/50 or what ever sizes they come in.

    i think the khs might have has a slightly higher top tube but i could be wrong. toe overlap is about the same on both, but geometry is diffrent. I had to shorten my chain when moving parts over to the bareknucle to keep it from being at the very end of the drop outs (or what ever track ends are properly called.)

    if price is an issue, the bareknuckle frame is same price as the off the shelf rush hour.

  17. #17
    Junior Member biciclectic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    the sticks, CA
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terror_in_pink
    i dont know if you have yet, but consider overlap. my friend rides a 49-50cm bareknuckle and complains of massive overlap.
    i have not considered it, i think the bareknuckle comes in a 48 and 50 only. do you know which size he/she rides for sure? and how tall is this person? I already expericing some overlap with my 50 cm.

  18. #18
    this bike is an aqueduct Matthew A Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    My Bikes
    Villin custom touring, Medici Pro Pista, KHS Alite1000, Windsor fixed commuter
    Posts
    1,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have massive toe overlap on my bike (it'd almost be pedal overlap on a smaller frame), but I don't think it's something worth complaining about, exactly. Track bikes are going to have pretty short wheelbases, it's gotta come from somewhere. Such is the territory...
    Villin custom touring | Raleigh XXIX | Medici Pro Pista | 1978 Schwinn Stingray

  19. #19
    Junior Member biciclectic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    the sticks, CA
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HexagonSun
    i'm 5'10" and i ride a 52 and it fits great. one of the things you should know about the bareknuckle is that the seat tube is sized center-to-center, so my 52cm is more like 53.5 center to top of seat tube measurement. the 52 also has a 54.5cm top tube, which is why i think many people find the frames to run large for their size. going by the seat tube measurement alone, you may find yourself stretched out too far on the bars because as the frames get smaller, the top tube lengths tend to be proportionally longer. i would suggest a 48. that would give you a 52cm top tube. compare that to your rush hour and determine whether you feel you need a longer or shorter reach to your bars. the seat tube size is less relevant because your seat post is easier to adjust than a stem/steerer tube length.
    I think the top tube for the bareknuckle is 53 and the top tube on my bike is a 52.5 and i feel slightly cramped already.

  20. #20
    knucklehead roscoenyc57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East Village, NYC
    My Bikes
    Rocky MT Track, Vivalo, Pista Concept, De Bernardi Track
    Posts
    520
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by biciclectic
    I think the top tube for the bareknuckle is 53 and the top tube on my bike is a 52.5 and i feel slightly cramped already.
    in your original post you were talkin' about buying one of these frames from the internet....

    you may want to make a field trip into town to a place that actually has some of these frames in stock.
    where the can put some wheels in the dropouts and you can stand over the frame. It would probably be worth the day trip.

    I usually ride a 56. I rode a friend's 54 and it was what I would describe as big.......

  21. #21
    TN!
    TN! is offline
    Senior Member TN!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    290
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I do agree that bareknuckles run big, but i honestly dont think they run THAT big. as stated above, im 5 10 and my 54 fits great, and i always though i had fairly short legs. eh

  22. #22
    Me talk pretty one day. eyefloater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,073
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gorn
    Hit control - (That's control and the minus key).
    *head smack*

  23. #23
    like, really sloppy sloppy robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    calipornia
    Posts
    2,285
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    am i the only one who kinda likes toe overlap?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •