Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

track geometry and road bikes and other stuff

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

track geometry and road bikes and other stuff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-06, 10:52 AM
  #1  
like, really sloppy
Thread Starter
 
sloppy robot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: calipornia
Posts: 2,285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
track geometry and road bikes and other stuff

its often discussed that people want trackish bikes, but with road geometry... but what about the other way around...i love the feel of steep geometry and I dont find it that uncomfortable. I know usually when a road frame says its for racing, its a bit steeper...and i hear that Gios' are traditionally steeper, but i don't know much more then that. Is there a commpany, or era, or something that leads to super steep road bikes? Are any as steep as track bikes?
sloppy robot is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 10:57 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd have to say my Mangusta (low end but faithful) road bike has steeper geometry than my fixedgear conversion and my to-be-built track frame. I personally don't prefer slacker angles, but I know it's all in my head. The only thing steep angles do for my ride is give me that quick responsive turning (but this is dependent on my fork rake moreso I bet) and also gives me a bumpier ride.
Ready to Ruck is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 11:35 AM
  #3  
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
baxtefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: not where i used to be
Posts: 4,847
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
crit bikes from the 90's would fit the bill
baxtefer is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 11:55 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
If you are not doing any kind of high performance or extreme riding, I don't think geometry (specifically head-tube angle) matters all that much. My fixie coversion is slack as hell and it doesn't really effect how I ride. I can still turn shapr corners, go fast, climb hills, etc.. I think for all but the most experienced high performance cyclists, or people who are downhilling, track racing, BMX jumping, or other extreme stuff, the difference between 2-3 degrees of head tube angle is not really all that important, except maybe for how it looks.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 12:24 PM
  #5  
likes avocadoes
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 1,125

Bikes: heh, like that info would fit here...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by baxtefer
crit bikes from the 90's would fit the bill
+1 on this. My partner's parkpre crit bike from '93 (team shaklee) is much steeper than my IRO.
r-dub is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 12:51 PM
  #6  
jack of one or two trades
 
Aeroplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640

Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by baxtefer
crit bikes from the 90's would fit the bill
Also, they might have a higher bb than most roadies (good) due to the cornering in crits. Maybe?
Aeroplane is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 01:10 PM
  #7  
works for truffles
 
pigmode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've spent quite some time riding the compact pro, and my Colnago which probably has the slackest geo in the biz, is no less responsive. The Gios is definitely a bit twitchier, and takes a steadier hand during 50+mph descents and curves at 40+mph. Is this bike going to be setup for short cruising, trick riding, or normal roadriding including high climbs and descents? Take into consideration not just the steepness of frontend angles, but also the rake of the fork that was designed for that frontend.
pigmode is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 01:19 PM
  #8  
like, really sloppy
Thread Starter
 
sloppy robot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: calipornia
Posts: 2,285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pigmode
I've spent quite some time riding the compact pro, and my Colnago which probably has the slackest geo in the biz, is no less responsive. The Gios is definitely a bit twitchier, and takes a steadier hand during 50+mph descents and curves at 40+mph. Is this bike going to be setup for short cruising, trick riding, or normal roadriding including high climbs and descents? Take into consideration not just the steepness of frontend angles, but also the rake of the fork that was designed for that frontend.
thats funny you have those 2 bikes.. I had this discussion with somone who had a colnago and a compact pro and it got me thinking..he doesnt ride track bikes but compared the two as ones liek a sports car(compact pro) and ones like a cadillac.. i hear everyone on the responsiveness.. what i really love about track bikes though is the wheels are under you.. and they dont have that chopper feeling front end that road bikes have after youve ridden a track bike for a while.. I usually do road rides 30-50 miles and pretty quick.. so this is no century machine i was looking for..just some fun.. and i was curious as to whats what
sloppy robot is offline  
Old 05-23-06, 01:43 PM
  #9  
works for truffles
 
pigmode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sloppy robot
thats funny you have those 2 bikes.. I had this discussion with somone who had a colnago and a compact pro and it got me thinking..he doesnt ride track bikes but compared the two as ones liek a sports car(compact pro) and ones like a cadillac.. i hear everyone on the responsiveness.. what i really love about track bikes though is the wheels are under you.. and they dont have that chopper feeling front end that road bikes have after youve ridden a track bike for a while.. I usually do road rides 30-50 miles and pretty quick.. so this is no century machine i was looking for..just some fun.. and i was curious as to whats what
Actually, the CP was my brother's spare bike that I used during an extended visit. As far as body positioning between the wheels vis a vis track and roadbikes, remember that RBs are designed to be able to climb, corner, and descent well. Even the Gios, which I believe has a fairly short front-center will still fit like a RB, but I believe it is tighter and steeper than most other RBs out there. I'd recommend, for whatever bike you choose, that you get a proper RB fit. There's no telling where your interests will channel if you ever discover the joys of climbing a mountain and flying down the other side.
pigmode is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.