wAcK SS 29'er...........
|
Originally Posted by -=£em in Pa=-
http://www.slipperypigbikes.com/mamb...cs/oner_lg.jpg
They claim a track bike is in the works too........ |
my head hurts thinking about setting that chain tension.
|
interestingly enough that paint option is called "anal sex." they also offer have a flesh colored tube with white spray detail dubbed "MTBukakke"
|
dual drive is the worst idea ever ever ever
|
someone please explain to me how left drive SS works.
|
someone please explain to me why bike companies name their products things such as "finger bangers" "anal sex" "bukakke" "strip bars" etc, especially bmx companies
|
Originally Posted by seasponge
someone please explain to me why bike companies name their products things such as "finger bangers" "anal sex" "bukakke" "strip bars" etc, especially bmx companies
|
What's funny is maybe now about a year ago a thread was made with a bike like that. He claimed it was inefficient in comparison to single drive. The noobs are catching on later-- and they're only going to find that it sucks. :D
|
Originally Posted by sloppy robot
that is the ****in worst
|
Anyone else notice they used vertical dropouts? Good work guys.
|
it looks like it has an eccentric BB though
|
SS 29er = good.
Dual Drive is ********. 100+years of the saftey bicycle has proven that one chain is enough. |
I think I have a marketing slogan for them. "Dual drive. because Single speed mountain bikes aren't heavy enough"
|
On their site they claim there is a torque advantage with dual drive. Sounds like BS to me.
|
Originally Posted by Moximitre
On their site they claim there is a torque advantage with dual drive. Sounds like BS to me.
|
Originally Posted by sloppy robot
thats a typo.. they actually meant "dork advantage"
|
you know what would be deck? Triple drive! A singlespeed with triple cranks, and 3 cogs on the rear cassette. All at the same ratio. It would have all the weight of a geared system with none of the mechanical advantage. Perfect chainline would be offset by 3 times the mechanical friction, and it would look SO BADASS!
|
you mean, 3 cogs and triples on each side.
|
Originally Posted by trons
you mean, 3 cogs and triples on each side.
|
double side drive with 3 chains on each side! 6 times the fun!
|
Originally Posted by onetwentyeight
double side drive with 3 chains on each side! 6 times the fun!
We know he searches the forums sometimes for his name so I'll just drop SHELDON and BROWN a couple of times here. You reading this, Sheldon? :D |
Originally Posted by AfterThisNap
someone please explain to me how left drive SS works.
For those who are hating on the design, there is a photo somewhere on the internet of a bike with 3 chains, all on the right side. Three chainrings, all the same size, and three cogs on a normal MTB hub with spacers. |
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
For those who are hating on the design, there is a photo somewhere on the internet of a bike with 3 chains, all on the right side. Three chainrings, all the same size, and three cogs on a normal MTB hub with spacers.
Outside the arctic circle, though, it seems a bit overkill. It would be cool to get a regular mountain triple - say, 24, 34, 44 teeth on the chainrings - and then have three different cogs on the back that make the gear ratios the same. Did I say cool? I meant dorky. |
Ah that's all crap. It's still rear wheel drive. I want a mtb w/ two wheel drive. That'd be useful. I mean useless.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.