Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Do you use brakes on your fixie?

Voters
132. You may not vote on this poll
  • Nope.

    51 38.64%
  • Front brake.

    72 54.55%
  • Both front and rear.

    9 6.82%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 62

Thread: Brakes or not?

  1. #1
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Brakes or not?

    After trying fixed gear up for size for a couple of weeks, I personally don't want to say goodbye to brakes. My (very short, admittedly) experience suggests that it's reckless to ride without brakes - or at least, it is, for me. Maybe because I'm a beginner. Also, I want to spare my knees as much as possible, and it seems that forceful backpedaling may be bad for them.

    On the other hand, there are accounts that show fixed gear biking to be good for one's knees.



    So, as unscientific as this may be, I am curious to know how much fixed gear bikers use brakes. Hence this poll. I am sure there will be at least one post saying "what a stupid poll". I'll survive

  2. #2
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tr0ll
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  3. #3
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,349
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Front brake here.
    For the experienced fixer, brakeless is probably OK if you are not riding very far or very fast. I've done it, and its a fun challenge. Brakeless in moderation is probably good for your knees. However, on an extended road ride, you will eventually let your guard down and your knees will start to suffer..thats when brakeless becomes dangerous and unhealthy...IMHO.

  4. #4
    :jarckass: deathhare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    6,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No brake=small cock compensation

  5. #5
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Judging from the poll results, it's not rare to have a brake or two, on a fixie. I had a completely different impression when I looked through the "Your Fixed Gear/SS Photos!" thread. There the proportion of brakeless to brakeful seems to be about 5:1 or 6:1. For the record, at the time of posting, the poll results are
    4 9 2
    Last edited by wroomwroomoops; 12-27-06 at 08:08 AM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    Trek 520, Fuji Track, Vicini Road
    Posts
    190
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    would anyone recommend running a ss (freewheel) with only a front brake?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    201
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    only if you're silly

  8. #8
    dillyshotback
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    M&M@MN
    My Bikes
    '02 Barcode, Le Tour IV, Hoffman E.P.
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deathhare
    No brake=small cock compensation

    When you have a small cock you have more leg room to stop that **** with your legs. What's wrong with that.

    No hand brakes here, but I I can stop as good as another other hack in town on their magna mountain bike. I like the simplicity.

  9. #9
    JuNKie! bike junkie! sniks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,559
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    started with front brake.

    now brakeless
    my wife bike has a front brake and I never touch it when I ride it.
    she even forgets it there. but she is glad it is.

  10. #10
    :jarckass: deathhare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    6,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dersu Burrows
    would anyone recommend running a ss (freewheel) with only a front brake?
    Nothing wrong with it at all.

  11. #11
    Senior Member sers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Salem, MA
    My Bikes
    Land Shark, Level Professional, Tsunami singlespeed, Giant Reign 1
    Posts
    2,190
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i have one fixie with brakes, the other without

  12. #12
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,349
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
    Judging from the poll results, it's not rare to have a brake or two, on a fixie. I had a completely different impression when I looked through the "Your Fixed Gear/SS Photos!" thread. There the proportion of brakeless to brakeful seems to be about 5:1 or 6:1. For the record, at the time of posting, the poll results are
    4 9 2

    Fixed Gear Gallery is the same...lots of bikes with no brakes, or anything else for that matter. Its fairly obvious that people dont really ride their bikes all that much, or they photograph their bikes before installing the brakes and other accessories or remove them off to take the photos. I guess is supposed to make the bike look cooler...really, it just makes it look less functional. Can you imagine all these people riding around with no brakes, no water bottles, no fenders, no frame pump, or bag for spare tube and tools? I kind of doubt it. Theres no way I'd ride far from home without most of that stuff (except maybe fenders, which I only have on one of my bikes).

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    1985 Pinarello Catena Lusso / 1983 Pinarello Montello / Raleigh Marathon / Camel Cigarettes conversion / 1957 Worksman cruiser / Puch 140 / Raleigh Grand Prix
    Posts
    849
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A singlespeed is obviously safer with two brakes. A fixed gear with two brakes, while not as aesthetically pleasing, is totally worth it.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    1985 Pinarello Catena Lusso / 1983 Pinarello Montello / Raleigh Marathon / Camel Cigarettes conversion / 1957 Worksman cruiser / Puch 140 / Raleigh Grand Prix
    Posts
    849
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mihlbach
    Fixed Gear Gallery is the same...lots of bikes with no brakes, or anything else for that matter. Its fairly obvious that people dont really ride teir bikes or they photograph their bikes before installing the brakes and other accessories or remove them off to take the photos. I guess is supposed to make the bike look cooler...really, it just makes it look less functional. Can you imagine all these people riding around with no brakes, no water bottles, no fenders, no frame pump, or bag for spare tube and tools? I kind of doubt it. Theres no way I'd ride far from home without that stuff.
    Water bottle, pump, tools and tubes go in a bag on my back.

  15. #15
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,349
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I Like Peeing
    Water bottle, pump, tools and tubes go in a bag on my back.

    Yeah, I considered that..but I doubt everyone rides everywhere with a Mess bag, and why would you? Its way nicer to just put that stuff on your frame. But then again, I never have to lock my bike up, so I can see where using a bag would be advantageous there. Still, this still doesn't solve the puzzle of all the missing brakes.

  16. #16
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mihlbach
    Fixed Gear Gallery is the same...lots of bikes with no brakes, or anything else for that matter. Its fairly obvious that people dont really ride their bikes all that much, or they photograph their bikes before installing the brakes and other accessories or remove them off to take the photos. I guess is supposed to make the bike look cooler...really, it just makes it look less functional. Can you imagine all these people riding around with no brakes, no water bottles, no fenders, no frame pump, or bag for spare tube and tools? I kind of doubt it. Theres no way I'd ride far from home without most of that stuff (except maybe fenders, which I only have on one of my bikes).
    Actually, as far as I remember, most photos I've seen, have been of frames that didn't even have the brake posts.

    OK, I went back to the "Your Fixed Gear/SS Photos!" thread, and I didn't see, in the few minutes I blanced through, one single instance where the bare brake tabs would be visible. So either all the frames where without them as designed, or they were shaved/filed off.

    Just saying that I don't think people took off the brakes for the "photo opportunity", unless they are disc brakes. Either they have brakes, or they don't even have the possibility of have them installed. The ratio seems really to be about 5:1 as I guesstimated at first. So, this poll seems to show that there's a "silent majority".

  17. #17
    Bow$$ dustinlikewhat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Bodymore, Murderland
    My Bikes
    Surly Instigator '02, Schwinn Traveler fixed conversion, '02 Fuji Track
    Posts
    2,013
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    both of mine have brake mount holes, and neither have brakes, and both are in the photo's sticky.

  18. #18
    Weekend warrior Telix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    My Bikes
    2005 Cannondale R700
    Posts
    142
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just started riding fixed, and I'm really really glad I have the front brake, even though it's just some janky BMX brake my buddy put on it before I inherited the frame. I have a flip-flop hub with a freewheel on the other side, and am debating just getting a decent front and rear brake system for the highest level of safety.

  19. #19
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,349
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
    Actually, as far as I remember, most photos I've seen, have been of frames that didn't even have the brake posts.

    OK, I went back to the "Your Fixed Gear/SS Photos!" thread, and I didn't see, in the few minutes I blanced through, one single instance where the bare brake tabs would be visible. So either all the frames where without them as designed, or they were shaved/filed off.
    Most people are running only a front brake..its very easy to remove and reinstall a front brake and it doesn't require cable guides. Peopl tend to file off the cable guides for the rear brake and for the shifter cables, becuase they are going for that "clean" look. All the more reason to take off the front brake for the photo. Anyway, thats my theory. I'm guess I'm not saying everyone does this, but I bet some people have.
    Last edited by mihlbach; 12-27-06 at 10:19 AM.

  20. #20
    Strange As Angels Fixxxie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    465
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dersu Burrows
    would anyone recommend running a ss (freewheel) with only a front brake?
    I used to ride a commuter bike I had with a 3spd freewheel and only front brake, it worked fine but I would hesitate to "reccomend" it.

    I for one don't have the skill to stop my bike quickly without a brake so I use a front just to make sure because automotive sheet metal just dont taste good. My wifes bike has both brakes to make her feel more secure. I think the aesthetics aren't too bad with brakes (personal opinion for sure)
    As for the carrying stuff thing, I usually have a messenger bag so I keep the tools and tubes in there, my bike has a Silca pump which I think looks pretty cool on it kinda adds to the vintage thing and I ride pretty far to work so bottle cage is definitely required. If I'm on a weekend ride or something I usually wear jerseys so I stuff all the junk in the back pocket
    $0.02

  21. #21
    Sir Fallalot wroomwroomoops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    5,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dustinlikewhat
    both of mine have brake mount holes, and neither have brakes, and both are in the photo's sticky.
    I'm looking at your Schwinn Traveler, and I can't see brake posts on the fork. How do you mount brakes on that frame?

    Here's the pic:


  22. #22
    Senior Member gwhalin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    White IRO Angus
    Posts
    160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even when I ride a freewheel bike, I only ever use the front brake. I would occasionally use the rear brake to scrub speed, but the front brake is where all the stopping power comes from. I never felt like this was bizarre or put me in any danger. The back brake I just did not use. I run only a front brake on my fixed gear, though I rarely use it. I tend to skip to stop 99 times out of a hundred. I keep the front brake for emergencies.
    Take back the bikelane!
    http://www.mybikelane.com/

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    424
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mihlbach
    Fixed Gear Gallery is the same...lots of bikes with no brakes, or anything else for that matter. Its fairly obvious that people dont really ride their bikes all that much, or they photograph their bikes before installing the brakes and other accessories or remove them off to take the photos. I guess is supposed to make the bike look cooler...really, it just makes it look less functional.
    It's bike p0rn. You don't see lots of clothing of girls in human p0rn either.

  24. #24
    Team Beer Cynikal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    My Bikes
    Too Many
    Posts
    5,774
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Started out with a front brake and after a year or so of not using it, it was removed.
    I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC

  25. #25
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,418
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
    I'm looking at your Schwinn Traveler, and I can't see brake posts on the fork. How do you mount brakes on that frame?
    Brakes are mounted on that bike in the same way they are mounted on this bike:
    http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...chmentid=32693

    There is a brake hole through the fork crown, where a brake is bolted onto.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •