Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    如果你能讀了這個你講中文 genericbikedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,542
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Open Pro vs Aerohead

    Hi -- I'm getting ready to pull the trigger on a rim for the next build, and I really can't decide between open pros and aeroheads. Open pro's have eyelets, which is a good thing, but people say that velocity's are great rims to build on because the seams are very well done. Can someone help me with plusses and minuses?

    Of course they are both great rims, I just want to pick everyone's brain for some more detail. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Taking "s" outta "Fast" AfterThisNap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Zoo York City
    Posts
    1,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go zipp or go home.
    Carries suspicious allegiance to Brooklyn Machine Works.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just went to the shop tonight after work to have a back wheel built and went with the open pros on a double fixed phil. The dude working thought I was just asking questions and wasting his time. He wasn't rude, he was just surprised that I was ready to throw half the money down right there to actally have it built.

  4. #4
    hunter, gatherer coelcanth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,183
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the seams ??

    the open pro has a semi aero profile and weighs around 200g less than the aerohead
    i don't think you need eyelets or washers on the aerohead because of the strength of the triangular design

  5. #5
    如果你能讀了這個你講中文 genericbikedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,542
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by coelcanth
    the seams ??

    the open pro has a semi aero profile and weighs around 200g less than the aerohead
    i don't think you need eyelets or washers on the aerohead because of the strength of the triangular design

    this is not true. grams for both is slightly over 400... with the aerohead a little lighter, actually.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Kilgore_Trout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Queens,NY; Boston,MA
    Posts
    720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BuddyMike
    I just went to the shop tonight after work to have a back wheel built and went with the open pros on a double fixed phil. The dude working thought I was just asking questions and wasting his time. He wasn't rude, he was just surprised that I was ready to throw half the money down right there to actally have it built.
    how do you like the double fixed? when i eventually get the money to build my own wheels, i might go with phils, but am debating over fixed/free or fixed/fixed.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I haven't ridden on it. I went to the shop to commission[lack of a better word] a wheel build. They are going to order the parts on Monday and they'll call me when the parts get in. The guy that took my order recommended the Open Pros. He even had them on his bike that was sitting right behind him. I was going to go with single fixed originally, but double fixed was only 20 bucks more.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Kilgore_Trout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Queens,NY; Boston,MA
    Posts
    720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    alrighty. i like the idea of being able to just flip the wheel to have a different gear ratio, but i feel like if i'm riding breakless, then having fixed/free isn't the best idea.

  9. #9
    Paste Taster Retem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver, Co
    My Bikes
    1970's kobe, Jury Bike, Dahon Boardwalk S1, Moto Outcast 29, Scrambler v3
    Posts
    4,390
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the look and feel of my phils and is it really a question get the open pros
    I am dyslexic so bear with my posts.... [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a formula fixed/free and have never put a freewheel on it. I never even thoght about it. Fixed/Fixed seems nice so I can do something like 15/17, depending on how much dropout space there is.

  11. #11
    Senior Member barba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have open pros and aeroheads on my road bikes. I can't say that one or the other is a night and day difference. They are both quality rims that will not let you down. Go with the one that will look the best on your build.

  12. #12
    Senior Member barba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BuddyMike
    I have a formula fixed/free and have never put a freewheel on it. I never even thoght about it. Fixed/Fixed seems nice so I can do something like 15/17, depending on how much dropout space there is.
    Fixed/fixed offers the most versatility. You can thread a freewheel on one way or the other.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by barba
    Fixed/fixed offers the most versatility. You can thread a freewheel on one way or the other.
    true story.

    edit-where in western mass are you located?

  14. #14
    Senior Member barba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BuddyMike
    true story.

    edit-where in western mass are you located?
    Amherst

  15. #15
    hunter, gatherer coelcanth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,183
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    opps you're right..
    on the factory website it looks like they put erd in the weight column

    Quote Originally Posted by genericbikedude
    this is not true. grams for both is slightly over 400... with the aerohead a little lighter, actually.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    965
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have ridden both, and built both.

    The Open Pros are slightly easier to build because of the eyelets - lubed brass nipples turn smoothly even at high tension. The holes are also angled left and right, which helps with that too. The spoke holes on the Aeroheads I got needed deburring before I started, and felt rough as the tension increased.

    Both are high quality, durable, light rims, and I doubt you'll notice a difference just riding along. Until you hit the brakes - the Open Pro has a smooth, tall, machined brake surface, and the Aerohead has a shorter surface, with a pinned seam. (unless Velocity has changed the Aerohead in the last 5 years) With the Aerohead, you'll feel the chunk-chunk-chunk of the seam hitting the brake pads for a while until it gets worn down a bit. Unless you're riding brakeless.

    Aeroheads look a little better, in my opinion.

  17. #17
    如果你能讀了這個你講中文 genericbikedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,542
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by same time
    Have ridden both, and built both.

    The Open Pros are slightly easier to build because of the eyelets - lubed brass nipples turn smoothly even at high tension. The holes are also angled left and right, which helps with that too. The spoke holes on the Aeroheads I got needed deburring before I started, and felt rough as the tension increased.

    Both are high quality, durable, light rims, and I doubt you'll notice a difference just riding along. Until you hit the brakes - the Open Pro has a smooth, tall, machined brake surface, and the Aerohead has a shorter surface, with a pinned seam. (unless Velocity has changed the Aerohead in the last 5 years) With the Aerohead, you'll feel the chunk-chunk-chunk of the seam hitting the brake pads for a while until it gets worn down a bit. Unless you're riding brakeless.

    Aeroheads look a little better, in my opinion.
    you're a gentleman and a scholar

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    5,317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have both. They are not even in the same class.

    Far from having a better seam the aerohead has a far worse one. Unlike the mavics it is not welded. It is true that it is not much more likely then a welded joint to catastrophically fail but there are lots of less then catastrophic things that can go wrong. A bump that would normally just result in a minor truing will knock the joint uneven on an aerohead if it is near it. This means the tension will have to be more uneven then normal to true and the wheel will brake poorly and eat pads until it gets worn back to smooth.

    Secondly there are the eyelets. Not only do they make the rim easier to build and true but they prevent cracking around the spoke whole by distributing force.

    As if that wasn't enough the recent aeroheads are supposedly of uneven wall thickness including some very thin places. This means they will wear out faster from braking especially if you only use one brake. Even if you aren't it means a weaker rim.

    I have both and I'm not a zealot. The aeroheads are good rims for the price but when it comes down to it from the joint to the eyelets to(apparently) the very extrusion and the alloy they are made from they simply are not in the same class as open pros.

    They are however often available for substantially cheaper and therefore are a good(though inferior) choice for a budget wheel build. Also the offset rear is great for geared wheels but that isn't really important in this forum.

  19. #19
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,317
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't understand why Mavic CXP33s aren't more popular.

  20. #20
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,428
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mihlbach
    I can't understand why Mavic CXP33s aren't more popular.
    Lots of people don't like the deep-v shape, doesn't come in crazy candy colors, the open pro is strong enough as it is.

  21. #21
    Cornucopia of Awesomeness baxtefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    not where i used to be
    Posts
    4,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mihlbach
    I can't understand why Mavic CXP33s aren't more popular.
    1. they're not tall enough to have any aero benefit
    2. they weigh a ton
    sounds like deep-v's eh? except...
    3. no colors
    {o,o**
    |)__)
    -"-"-

    O RLY?

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by barba
    Amherst
    Everytime I'm out that way I see people on Fixies. I'm not sure how many people ride there though.

    I went with open pros because I figured they won't look wierd or ****ty when switching the wheel to other bikes.

  23. #23
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,317
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by baxtefer
    1. they're not tall enough to have any aero benefit
    2. they weigh a ton
    sounds like deep-v's eh? except...
    3. no colors

    According to the weight weenies website, 33s are only about 20-25 grams heavier than open pros (but stiffer due to their deeper profile) and way lighter than deep Vs. I think this makes then a better rim, especially for urban fixie abuse. And personally speaking, I could care less about having neon green rims.
    Last edited by mihlbach; 01-13-07 at 09:26 AM.

  24. #24
    legalize bikes
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    bucks county, PA
    My Bikes
    too damn many
    Posts
    1,250
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by baxtefer
    1. they're not tall enough to have any aero benefit
    yes and im positive 95% of the deep v owners are buying them for the aerodynamic benefits.

  25. #25
    Taking "s" outta "Fast" AfterThisNap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Zoo York City
    Posts
    1,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I roll with the cxp33s. I'm not sure where the no aero effect idea comes from though. Josh Brandt put out one article about how the low profile may not have any aero benefit, which is pretty lame. Personally I think any aero benefit is better than none. Air flows around an egg better than it does a brick.

    I like them because they're purty and strong. Light enough to race with, sturdy enough to commute every day.
    Carries suspicious allegiance to Brooklyn Machine Works.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •