Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    650 Rear/700 Front Fixed Gear

    Has anyone tried running a 650 rear/700 front wheel combination? Iím going to build another set of wheels for a fixed-gear and thought this might be an cool way to give the bike a little more personality and possibly my increase cadence at the same time. Any thoughts?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    727
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you wanna increase your cadence just move to a smaller chainring or a larger cog.

    the smaller wheel will look rather goofy in a 700c/27" frame. that's just my opinion though. i cant imagine it'd be very comfortable either, you'd have to tilt your saddle nose-down quite a bit.
    i ride bikes.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    columbus oh
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It will screw up handling of bike a fair amount.....make the steering a little slower.It would be ridable though.More importantly it will make the BB that much closer to road,and that isnt good on a fixie.

  4. #4
    MaNiC! NZLcyclist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Hamilton, New Zealand
    My Bikes
    2004 Cervelo Soloist 105, 2005 Apollo Apex, 2006 SCOTT Speedster S30
    Posts
    1,601
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought Marco Pantani rode a custom built in the 98 tour that had a 650C front and a 700C rear to get him aerodynamic for TTs cause he was such a small fulla

    Brendon
    Scott Speedster S30
    Shimano 105 Shifters and Derailleurs
    FSA Energy 50/34 Compact Cranks
    Spinergy Stealth PBO Race wheels
    Sram OG 1070 casette

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought this would be a cool way to give the bike a little more rake without changing forks and add the sloping top tube look. I didnít think thereíd be that much difference in bottom bracket to ground clearance to matter but I guess so. The Ď80s Cannondale MTB bikes used a 24r/26f wheel combo that was really trick looking in its day.

    Thanks for the comments.

  6. #6
    Senior Member KnightWhoSaysNi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Yalding, Kent, England
    Posts
    127
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Did you have in mind the opposite of this?

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    richmond, va
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    lots of MTB's/dirt bmx bikes to that because the smaller back wheel will dig in for straight traction, and the fatter front wheel helps steering a lot.

    *ps- that keith harring bike is nuts. i'll take 2 please*
    Last edited by enderwaves; 07-10-03 at 04:22 PM.

  8. #8
    (Grouchy)
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,643
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    that's my purstuit. i LOVE the way it handles. and when i say LOVE, i mean i would have sex with this bike if there was a suitable orifice.

    you can't tell from the pic, but the top tube DOES slope, and the front wheel IS smaller than the rear...also it's about a 50cm seat tube, so the slope isn't all THAT dramatic...definitely not as dramatic as that other bike...i should really get taller frames...

    oh wait...yeah, the topic...umm...650 rear/700 front would be bad. very bad, yes, unless the frame was built for it...maybe some nice builder would put it together for you on the cheap...then again, probably not. it also wouldn't be legal to ride on the track, but you probably don't care about that...even 650c fronts aren't legal anymore...stupid UCI...

  9. #9
    cxmagazine dot com pitboss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    WI
    My Bikes
    Titus road, Fort CX
    Posts
    8,270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    suitable orifice? WHAAAA????
    Doesn't that have a "BIcycle Topic" unto itself? Very Cycle-philic...
    Deathlap - cyclocross, training, beer,...escape hatch

  10. #10
    (Grouchy)
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,643
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i don't see the topic that talks about bike lovin'.

    i was just saying...that riding that bike is better than sex.

    a few nights ago i went for a 3-speed cruise around the city with a friend. i borrowed my GF's dumpstered 3-speed, and we cruised for a bit. then i decided to come home and switch bikes. cause that bike is TWEAKED. so i hopped on that yellow monster and i said to my female companion as we rode down a darkened street "wow! this bike is like...i can't describe it...it's like..."

    "yeah, it's really excellent," she said (i let her take a few laps in a parking lot earlier).

    "IT'S LIKE SEX!!" i exclaimed.

    she said: "uhm...yeah...i guess it is, it's really nice."

    then i giggled and i think i weirded her out.

  11. #11
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was thinking about doing the same thing...
    I figured it wouldn't be good for my front though.

    Bar spin away!

  12. #12
    :)
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    duluth
    My Bikes
    '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450
    Posts
    3,391
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by enderwaves View Post
    lots of MTB's/dirt bmx bikes to that because the smaller back wheel will dig in for straight traction, and the fatter front wheel helps steering a lot.

    *ps- that keith harring bike is nuts. i'll take 2 please*
    But these bikes were designed with consideration to the wheel sizes.
    Quote Originally Posted by Santaria View Post
    because physics has more street cred than tarckstars.

  13. #13
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bump de bump, yeah....but how does this combo on a road bike (if meant for climbing, thus, necessarily, descending!) not help? i realize geometry is affected a bit (how much?), but i would think that if the 69er idea works for some bikes, why not the 700-650er? adust the saddle, the bars a bit....

    has anyone done this for road? not all that curious about fixie/cool looks. this is about performance.
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  14. #14
    Antarctica awaits WoundedKnee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Tucson, Zona
    Posts
    1,961
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dude.. you made a bad choice.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Capocaccia's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    403
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by UBUvelo View Post
    bump de bump, yeah....but how does this combo on a road bike (if meant for climbing, thus, necessarily, descending!) not help? i realize geometry is affected a bit (how much?), but i would think that if the 69er idea works for some bikes, why not the 700-650er? adust the saddle, the bars a bit....

    has anyone done this for road? not all that curious about fixie/cool looks. this is about performance.

    Do you see anyone using that wheel setup in a professional racing setting? No. Not on a MTB not on a road bike. This should tell you something. If the R&D departments at bike manufacturers around the world see no use in it then it obviously isnt going to help your performance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrodzilla View Post
    They sell furniture too. ****ing posers.

  16. #16
    モㄥ工匕モ 爪モ爪乃モ尺 evilcryalotmore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    LA San Gabriel, California
    My Bikes
    Custom frame
    Posts
    2,135
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Imma try 650cc rear and 700cc front. yep.

  17. #17
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Capocaccia View Post
    Do you see anyone using that wheel setup in a professional racing setting? No. Not on a MTB not on a road bike. This should tell you something. If the R&D departments at bike manufacturers around the world see no use in it then it obviously isnt going to help your performance.
    actually, being a mtbiker who is starting to road (and not pro racing...), that's why i asked...because the seemingly similar larger front wheel set up of the TREK 69er WAS raced by folks and if you check out reviews, yes, some thought it was great for racing. http://www.mtbr.com/cat/bikes/29er/t...7_1548crx.aspx

    still, not worth the experiment since i don't have a rear 650 wheel.
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  18. #18
    -
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Banned in DC
    Posts
    454
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are advantages to a 69er off-road, mostly that it allows you to spin up the lighter rear wheel and still have rock clearence with the front wheel. And that is for bikes and forks designed to use such a setup.

    There are no advantages to this setup on the road, especially when the bike is not designed around the smaller rear wheel.

    The only way it would be even remotely sensible is if you were using a very fat tire (50mm+) on a bike that could not otherwise use fat tires, and you didn't need a rear brake.
    I have a front brake, but I only use it for slowing or stopping.

  19. #19
    Master of Ceremonies proantibicycle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    My Bikes
    2005 Lemond Versailles, 2010 Mercier Kilo OS fixed gear, 2008 Redline Monocog Flight, 1985 Peugot 700c conversion
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I knew a guy once that rode a bike similar to what you are talking about. He had a Schwinn Cruiser with a 20" wheel on the back and a 26" wheel on the front. I don't see him anymore. He left town with the rest of the circus.
    --
    Pro-Anti Bicycle : http://proantibicycle.blogspot.com
    --
    "They have a saying in Chicago, Mr. Bond. Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •