Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Hi. I'm in Delaware. Robbykills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Newark, Delaware
    My Bikes
    1985 Schwinn Voyageur (Touring, Commuter), LMNO custom track (www.lmnocycles.com), 1999 Gary Fisher Mt. Tam SS, 2003 Motobecane Mirage, IRO Group Buy Rob Roy cruiser-fied, Dirt Research Kobuck (pedicab equipped)
    Posts
    509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Crank Length for Track

    So I got measured at my LBS and my crank length should be 170. Pretty soon I'd like to get a track frame (mainly for street use but maybe one day I'll be in shape enough to race?) and 165 seems to be the preferred size. Now has this come about as a remedy for conversions to have less a chance of pedal strike? Should I get 165's or will the increased bottom bracket height on a track frame compensate for the risk of pedal strike and allow me to safely run 170s?

  2. #2
    MFA jjvw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denver
    My Bikes
    1973 Italvega Nouvo Record; '04 Felt F80 :1977 Motobecane Super Mirage : 1965 Hercules
    Posts
    1,176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been running 170's on a road conversion almost daily for two years and have never had pedal stike happen to me. Don't forget that all the fuss is over a 1/4". Buy what you like and buy what you can afford.

  3. #3
    Senior Member mihlbach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    6,317
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In reference to whatever is the best crank length for you on a road bike, its fairly standard for cyclists to use a 2.5-5mm shorter crank on a track bike and a 2.5-5mm longer crank on a mountain bike. So if your "fit" is 170mm cranks, I'd go with 170s on a road bike, 165s on a track bike, and maybe 172.5s on a mountain bike.
    For my height, I use 175s on a road bike, but I use 167.5mm and 170mm cranks on a fixed gear. You'll benefit from shorter cranks on fixed gear bikes because a shorter crank gives you a wider range of cadence and is more comfortable to spin at high cadence.
    Last edited by mihlbach; 04-15-07 at 06:11 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member eddiebrannan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    DW
    Posts
    3,363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    165s are preferable. if you are taller and run a larger frame then go for 167.5. if you are using them for street then this will definitely be better than 170, but for sue if you are buying new and have a choice do not buy 170 cranks

  5. #5
    Fell off the Sober Sofa. EyeRobot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    My Bikes
    Independent Fabrication Deluxe XT, Club Fuji Dura Ace... Specialized Stump Jumper, Trek 930, Cannondale M300... who knows what the cat will drag in next?
    Posts
    193
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Buddy of mine just went down from pedal strike the other day. THE THREAT IS REAL.

    If I were you I'd defy your roadie numbers and just go for the 165. I'm sure it'll be fine.
    Too many bikes. (?)

  6. #6
    Hi. I'm in Delaware. Robbykills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Newark, Delaware
    My Bikes
    1985 Schwinn Voyageur (Touring, Commuter), LMNO custom track (www.lmnocycles.com), 1999 Gary Fisher Mt. Tam SS, 2003 Motobecane Mirage, IRO Group Buy Rob Roy cruiser-fied, Dirt Research Kobuck (pedicab equipped)
    Posts
    509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks guys.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Athens, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Custom Custom Custom
    Posts
    5,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Crank lengths would depend on the type of track you race on. If it has steep banking, you'd want 165's. If its not as steep, 170's. Best thing to do is go talk to the racers at your velodrome. They'd help you with gearing too.

  8. #8
    Hi. I'm in Delaware. Robbykills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Newark, Delaware
    My Bikes
    1985 Schwinn Voyageur (Touring, Commuter), LMNO custom track (www.lmnocycles.com), 1999 Gary Fisher Mt. Tam SS, 2003 Motobecane Mirage, IRO Group Buy Rob Roy cruiser-fied, Dirt Research Kobuck (pedicab equipped)
    Posts
    509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    T-town is the local velodrome but I've only been once. I've been riding my fixed gear road bike for about 3 1/2 years with 170s but I wasn't sure if the 165 length was just a concern for street or not. I think I'm gonna go with them for now. And I shouldn't have to worry about proper track gearing for quite some time as I think it will be a little while before my fat ass tries to ride competitivly on a track haha. once again, thanks.

  9. #9
    Bike Honky bottom-bracket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    corvallis, OR
    My Bikes
    KHS touring thing that's old, French? fixxie, 69 schwinn stingray show bike.
    Posts
    422
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have slid through corners at 25 MPH on my pedals, It makes you pee a little. Reduce your chances of pedal strike where you can.
    FGG#1756and 5,964

  10. #10
    aka mattio queerpunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,323
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jjvw
    I've been running 170's on a road conversion almost daily for two years and have never had pedal stike happen to me. Don't forget that all the fuss is over a 1/4". Buy what you like and buy what you can afford.
    all that fuss over 1/4" is warranted. i've never ridden on a track but i spent two years on 170s before getting 165s for another bike. the difference is huge and comfortable.
    the hipster myth.

    i practice vagabondery.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    5,317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Robbykills
    T-town is the local velodrome but I've only been once. I've been riding my fixed gear road bike for about 3 1/2 years with 170s but I wasn't sure if the 165 length was just a concern for street or not. I think I'm gonna go with them for now. And I shouldn't have to worry about proper track gearing for quite some time as I think it will be a little while before my fat ass tries to ride competitivly on a track haha. once again, thanks.
    If you've been fine for 3 1/2 years and you are getting a bike with a higher bb you will continue to be fine.

  12. #12
    MFA jjvw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denver
    My Bikes
    1973 Italvega Nouvo Record; '04 Felt F80 :1977 Motobecane Super Mirage : 1965 Hercules
    Posts
    1,176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by queerpunk
    all that fuss over 1/4" is warranted. i've never ridden on a track but i spent two years on 170s before getting 165s for another bike. the difference is huge and comfortable.
    I can't speak to the comfort issue with 165's, but I've managed another 25 miles still without pedal strike on my 170's.

    If you make hard and fast turns on the rough streets on a track bike with an already high bb and you feel you need the tiny bit of extra clearance then go with what makes you comfortable.

  13. #13
    Paste Taster Retem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver, Co
    My Bikes
    1970's kobe, Jury Bike, Dahon Boardwalk S1, Moto Outcast 29, Scrambler v3
    Posts
    4,390
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you should really run the crank length that is most comfortable for you
    for me 165s are very good for the spin nice even tight small circles
    170s are better if you have longer legs

    I have never had a pedal stirke on my conversion with 171 and a bb that is lower by a cm
    I am dyslexic so bear with my posts.... [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  14. #14
    mofo
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    crank length also depends on bb height, and to a lesser extent width. if it is a true track frame the height of your bottom bracket will compensate for cornering-banking. but that doesn't mean you should throw on 180's...
    if u dig thru some old threads there was a poll (maybe last week) on crankarm length. quite a few riders here are on 170s.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by EyeRobot
    Buddy of mine just went down from pedal strike the other day. THE THREAT IS REAL.

    If I were you I'd defy your roadie numbers and just go for the 165. I'm sure it'll be fine.
    I had pedal strike all the time on my last bike and I never went down. Maybe because I was used to it from my bmx bike, but it never phased me.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,414
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nitropowered
    Crank lengths would depend on the type of track you race on. If it has steep banking, you'd want 165's. If its not as steep, 170's. Best thing to do is go talk to the racers at your velodrome. They'd help you with gearing too.
    Agree. There are some tracks that are so steep that you have to be going pretty fast on the banking to avoid strikes with any crank legnth.
    Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

    1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
    1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
    1988 Ducati 750 F1

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    5,317
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by me thinkst
    crank length also depends on bb height, and to a lesser extent width. if it is a true track frame the height of your bottom bracket will compensate for cornering-banking.
    That is simpy not true with steep banking and a good abrasive surface a high bb won't save you from pedal strike even with 165s. If you are a sprinter or just don't want to worry about accidentally going to slow 165s are your best bet.

    The OP doesn't ride regularly on a track anyway though. This thread is somewhat deceptively titled.

  18. #18
    Senior Member hockeyteeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    Posts
    1,640
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The difference is not just 1/4" since your pedal strikes when the bike is at an angle, not standing up straight.

    Narrower pedals help alleviate pedal strike. Don't use BMX platforms or touring pedals and make turns using common sense. I wouldn't go with 165s if you intend to use the bike for the street mostly. They will make you lose much-appreciated leverage. I also find that vintage 165 cranks are more expensive, so I just buy the 170s, haha.

  19. #19
    aka mattio queerpunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,323
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jjvw
    I can't speak to the comfort issue with 165's, but I've managed another 25 miles still without pedal strike on my 170's.

    If you make hard and fast turns on the rough streets on a track bike with an already high bb and you feel you need the tiny bit of extra clearance then go with what makes you comfortable.
    but i wasn't talking about pedal strike. i was talking about the comfort difference that i felt.
    the hipster myth.

    i practice vagabondery.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •