Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Senior Member SeanBonham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Louisville, Ky
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check, 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    483
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    IRO Angus or Mark V???

    SO...

    I am going to sell my fixed Cross Check and buy a complete IRO with some upgrades. My initial intention was to go with the Angus because of the Reynolds tubing, simplicity, and the cool old school build I could do with it, but I am having second thoughts. The, also sweet, Mark V has the appeal of the threadless stem (I do love a nitto quill though), looks tough and it is a few bucks cheaper.

    What experience do you folks have with these frames?
    Pros Cons etc.
    I am going to be mostly using this as a commuter/street racer.

    GO...

    thanks
    sean

  2. #2
    20-Something Desk Jockey andypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Tallahassee
    Posts
    543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sames tubes. I would go with whichever frame works with the HS you already have.

  3. #3
    Banned. red house's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In the stomach of a whale. :beer:
    My Bikes
    Lemond Fillmore, Cmofalge black baby
    Posts
    5,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I used to have the best of both worlds; A Mark V Pro.. but the seat post seized and got decapitated w/o coming out from the frame. So now I have a Mark V, which I like quite a lot. I'd like to get an Angus just so I could have the nice quill stem look, which chics dig. The Mark V doesn't get me much p****, I need to bust out my miyata for that. Go with the Angus.

  4. #4
    Banned. red house's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In the stomach of a whale. :beer:
    My Bikes
    Lemond Fillmore, Cmofalge black baby
    Posts
    5,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by andypants
    Sames tubes. I would go with whichever frame works with the HS you already have.

    The Angus doesn't have a nicer tube set? Why the more money?

  5. #5
    Senior Member SeanBonham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Louisville, Ky
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check, 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    483
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Angus is Reynolds 631
    Mark V is 4130

    Reynolds is the reason for the extra cash.

    thanks for the words, keep em coming

  6. #6
    20-Something Desk Jockey andypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Tallahassee
    Posts
    543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey! Looks like you know enough already. It's up to you now.

  7. #7
    aka mattio queerpunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,389
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i'd go with the Mark V. you won't notice the upgrade in tubing, except maybe in weight (and i mean come on, you can always get a lighter wheelset, or drink less beers), but you'll definitely notice the improved performance/stiffness of a threadless steertube, and you'll definitely notice yourself saving some money.
    the hipster myth.

    i practice vagabondery.

  8. #8
    Metro DC Refugee
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    McLean, VA
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by red house
    The Mark V doesn't get me much p****, I need to bust out my miyata for that. Go with the Angus.
    As if. Icky. The only p**** you'll ever get with this approach is your own mang**na.

  9. #9
    dmg
    dmg is offline
    Beautiful Member dmg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I noticed a big difference between my cross check and my angus - the CC would flex sprinting or on uphills while the Angus is like a rock. Of course, I've never ridden a Mark V so it's kinda apples and oranges. I do kinda wish the Angus had the option of a threadless 631 fork, but c'est la vie.

  10. #10
    cars are fun
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was split over the Angus and Mark V. I eventually went with the Mark V because of the stem and never looked back. Love my Mark V.

    If you use your bike to get *****, you need to work on your game.
    the lion from within must guard his palace, because everybody's going to try to take a sip from his chalice

  11. #11
    prolly is not probably johnprolly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    brooklyn | NYC
    Posts
    1,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Angus all the way. I own one and honestly, I think the Mark V's geometry is too similiar to a road bike.

  12. #12
    monster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    707
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I was thinking of getting an IRO I could have sworn that the geometry for the Angus and Mark V are the same.

  13. #13
    Senior Member john_and_off's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    new bedford/boston
    Posts
    487
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the two have identical geometry

    this really comes down to the following:

    reynolds vs. 4130
    threaded vs. threadless
    slightly more expensive vs. slightly cheaper
    round tubing vs. ovalized downtube (purely aesthetic)

    i like my angus, but i know i would've been happy with a mark v too.

    listen to queerpunk if money is a concern

  14. #14
    Dude. Natron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check, Specialized Langster Pro
    Posts
    400
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by queerpunk
    ...or drink less beers
    Whoaaa now let's not get all crazy here..

  15. #15
    It's in your head.
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Beyond the tubes the choice is really about threadless or threaded headsets. I ride a Mark V because I have tons of extra threadless headset parts (all my bikes are such) and don't like the look of quill stems and/or dealing with threaded headsets. I adore the frame and can't find a single fault with it, I have maybe 2500miles on it.

    Ironically enough I'm currently building up a Cross Check....

  16. #16
    aka mattio queerpunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,389
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by johnprolly
    Angus all the way. I own one and honestly, I think the Mark V's geometry is too similiar to a road bike.
    you've said this before, and others have responded to you.

    they are the same geometry.

    they are the same geometry.

    they are the exact same geometry.
    the hipster myth.

    i practice vagabondery.

  17. #17
    thomas masini lives
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    i aint dh no mo'
    Posts
    3,496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i see your point

    but i prefer the geometry of the angus
    not a 2ksuck'r

  18. #18
    Senior Member radiocontrolhea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hahahaha.

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by john_and_off View Post
    the two have identical geometry

    this really comes down to the following:

    reynolds vs. 4130
    threaded vs. threadless
    slightly more expensive vs. slightly cheaper
    round tubing vs. ovalized downtube (purely aesthetic)

    i like my angus, but i know i would've been happy with a mark v too.

    listen to queerpunk if money is a concern
    Hi, I'm looking into track frames, and IRO frames; and stumbled upon this thread. Was wondering about some difference questions about the IRO frames.

    What is the difference with Reynolds 631 and 4130? Is 631 stronger and lighter?

    What is the difference with threaded and threadless stem/forks? Sounds like one may be more compatible with some parts or something. What are quilled stems, and what is the opposite of this?


    Also adding onto the difference between Mark V and Angus:
    Mark V has a hole in the rear bridge for rear brakes
    and cable stops on the top tube.

    Angus does not. But it's a track bike, who needs rear brakes anyways? (maybe for the 1-5% that utilizes the SS)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •