Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-15-07, 09:18 PM   #1
camy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DFW
Bikes:
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Chainrings/sprockets, big or small?

I'm currently riding a biopace 42T chainring and a 16T DA sprocket. I like the ratio as a nice "spin" gear but would also like a low-cadence "big" gear. I do have a fixed/fixed hub, so I'm good to go in that regards.

I just threw my chain and have decided to ditch the biopace, so the only thing I'm keeping is the 16T cog. I can go with either a 47T chainring and 16/18 rear sprockets or 42T chainring and 14/16 sprockets.

Is there any advantage of going one way over the other? The only thing I can figure out is that the 42T chainring option will allow me to get a second DA cog.
camy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-07, 09:25 PM   #2
sprintcarblue
dillyshotback
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: M&M@MN
Bikes: '02 Barcode, Le Tour IV, Hoffman E.P.
Posts: 631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
if you go with the bigger gearing. you use more metal, thus killing more penguins and seals making you a jacka ss. If you go with a smaller gearing, using less metal Al Gore may give you a handjob.
sprintcarblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-07, 09:56 PM   #3
roadgator
raodmaster shaman
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: G-ville
Bikes:
Posts: 1,431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
a smaller ring will let you get a bigger ratio difference between cog changes. but bigger rings/cogs will last a tad longer, possibly a bit less friction too.

edit: i'd just go with whichever will be cheaper. it wont matter much one way or the other.
roadgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-07, 11:03 PM   #4
caloso
Packfodding 3
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper
Posts: 33,752
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
I don't think it'll matter much. I did a similar thing, but increased my chainring up one tooth and decreased the cog one tooth, from 42x16 (69 g.i.) to 43x15 (75g.i.). I'll probably go back to 69 for the winter.
caloso is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 AM.