Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 39
  1. #1
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Soon to be SS commuter



    set up with drops and about 1.5" of drop between the saddle and bars. 52x16. Sprinter4sure.

  2. #2
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    philly
    Posts
    994
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Neato. I like it. That's quite a nice frame. Know how old it is?
    Post pics when it's done, pleeeeeeeeeease.

  3. #3
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    526
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks uncomfortable. At least put some tires on it before you try to ride it...

  4. #4
    Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz cc700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    seattle
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Militis 3
    Posts
    8,528
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    52x16? you must have legs. nice frame though, i'm jealous.

  5. #5
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I do have legs, yes. They assist me in things. 52x16 really isn't bad for the kind of riding I do commuting. It's almost always less than 4 miles so I just sprint, hence the aggressive setup. I may drop it down to 42x16 or something similarly weaksauce once the wind picks up. Going uphill against a sustained 30mph wind with a 3:1 ratio is usually less rewarding than walking.

  6. #6
    Hello. crushkilldstroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West Seattle
    Posts
    2,902
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You're nuts. I commute on a 44x17. Sayin'.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Chrysiptera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston (Coolidge Corner in Brookline)
    Posts
    315
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah.. I've been riding 47x16 with 165mm cranks daily for a couple weeks. I've yet to get spinning so fast that I couldn't keep up.. I wish I had gotten a 45 or even 43 chainring

    -chry
    ... I'm the center of attention in the walls inside my head ...

    1984 Fuji Berkeley: Fixed conversion build thread
    2006 Specialized Langster SS, 197x Motobecane Mirage: crummy SS
    2005 Trek 2100, 1953 Raleigh Sports: Restoration on hold

  8. #8
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The higher ratios give you the option to always go faster and accelerate QUICKLY. Only takes a couple weeks to get used to. Plus I like always pedaling against resistance instead of just idly spinning away.

  9. #9
    big ring MIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    philadelphia
    Posts
    5,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "abortionpunch" - that sounds violent.

  10. #10
    Hello. crushkilldstroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West Seattle
    Posts
    2,902
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by abortionpunch View Post
    The higher ratios give you the option to go faster and accelerate QUICKLY.
    Uh, no. Have you ever driven a car with a manual transmission?

    You wanna go faster, spin faster.

  11. #11
    assonfire Heyduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My commuter's a 45x18. One day I'll progress but winter's on its way....

  12. #12
    veggieburglar ryanlovesyou's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Santa Barbara/San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    60s Peugeot conversion, 2002 Santa Cruz Heckler, 2007 Bianchi "Everyone has one" Pista, Beat up Beach Cruiser
    Posts
    652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by crushkilldstroy View Post
    Uh, no. Have you ever driven a car with a manual transmission?

    You wanna go faster, spin faster.
    truth

  13. #13
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's ok that your weak thighs disagree with me. You'll be spinning your merry little ass like a top while I still have gear to bite into. I'm not saying the smaller gear ratios aren't without their benefits. They don't make you work as hard. But, like I said, I sprint everywhere. Speed is king.

  14. #14
    Hello. crushkilldstroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West Seattle
    Posts
    2,902
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by abortionpunch View Post
    It's ok that your weak thighs disagree with me. You'll be spinning your merry little ass like a top while I still have gear to bite into. I'm not saying the smaller gear ratios aren't without their benefits. They don't make you work as hard. But, like I said, I sprint everywhere. Speed is king.
    Get as snippy as you want. I'm just trying to help you out here and you're making yourself sound like a ******.

    If you want to run that ratio, go ahead. Nothing's stopping you. I'm just saying that unless you're some olympiad dude you'll be more comfortable with a smaller gear.

    Maybe it's the whole illusion of speed thing.

  15. #15
    Cornucopia of Awesomeness baxtefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    not where i used to be
    Posts
    4,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by abortionpunch View Post
    It's ok that your weak thighs disagree with me. You'll be spinning your merry little ass like a top while I still have gear to bite into. I'm not saying the smaller gear ratios aren't without their benefits. They don't make you work as hard. But, like I said, I sprint everywhere. Speed is king.
    Tadashi moved to Arizona?
    {o,o**
    |)__)
    -"-"-

    O RLY?

  16. #16
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You're trying to help by imposing your view of how my bike should be set up, not knowing me at all, and becoming self-righteous when I explain to you that your ideal setup is not mine? Believe me, I don't need your help here.

    This is not my first bike. I've been riding this ratio for years. I've tried other ratios. This is the one I like and ride well with.


    So yea, I am a ******. What do you expect from someone with a handle like abortionpunch? Hearts made out of coathangers? And like I mentioned, It's not about comfort for me. Our priorities differ. You can either leave it at that or you can pursue this into another ratio argument where it just turns out people have different riding styles, strengths, and weaknesses.

  17. #17
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh, and It's worth noting that the "manual transmission" analogy is fundamentally flawed when considering single speed bikes. It's much more akin to putting more current through an electric motor.

  18. #18
    .
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    526
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by abortionpunch View Post
    You're trying to help by imposing your view of how my bike should be set up, not knowing me at all, and becoming self-righteous when I explain to you that your ideal setup is not mine? Believe me, I don't need your help here.

    This is not my first bike. I've been riding this ratio for years. I've tried other ratios. This is the one I like and ride well with.


    So yea, I am a ******. What do you expect from someone with a handle like abortionpunch? Hearts made out of coathangers? And like I mentioned, It's not about comfort for me. Our priorities differ. You can either leave it at that or you can pursue this into another ratio argument where it just turns out people have different riding styles, strengths, and weaknesses.
    Really making some friends around here. Nice work. I always love to see self-righteous idiots who make a lot of noise about having sh*t for brains.

    Folks were trying to be helpful and you and shat on them. How brilliant of you. Why don't you sprint that ratio into a cholla cactus, wingnut?

  19. #19
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yup, I did **** on them (mainly crushkill as the others seemed to respect my ability to determine my own needs) and their ignorance of my riding style, experience, and needs. Someone telling a stranger what they need to be comfortable isn't exactly the most civil approach.

    So entertaining that any talk of ratios and comfort always ends up with a bunch of hurt feelings.
    Last edited by BLIMP; 08-21-07 at 05:21 PM. Reason: clarification

  20. #20
    Hello. crushkilldstroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West Seattle
    Posts
    2,902
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by abortionpunch View Post
    Oh, and It's worth noting that the "manual transmission" analogy is fundamentally flawed when considering single speed bikes. It's much more akin to putting more current through an electric motor.
    Go try and start a car in 1st gear. Then try and start it in 3rd. Then come back and talk to me.

    You seem to be tilting at windmills here. We're trying to help you (a rarity around here, by the way) and you're just barking out of your ass.

  21. #21
    spin The LT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    My Bikes
    raleigh m-60, azonic steelhead, schwinn world sport fixed gear
    Posts
    1,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by abortionpunch View Post
    with a 3:1 ratio
    actually it is 3.25 at 52x16...

  22. #22
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm not denying that more energy is needed in higher geared system. Provided the energy is available however, the higher geared system will be more efficient at its top end while the top end of the lower geared system will reach a point of diminishing returns, hence the spinning your legs around like a top comment. The electric motor analogy is considerably more sound.

    You seem to be having trouble with physics.

    And gordiep, it's always nice to see someone criticize another for things said that weren't in the kindest tone while simultaneously wishing them harm.

  23. #23
    automobile gravitron BLIMP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    event horizon
    My Bikes
    Kona Blast, Scwinn Traveler, Older Stumpjumper, Lemond Maillot Juane, Surly Crosscheck
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    3.25, thanks.

    Didn't feel like doing the division at the time.

  24. #24
    big ring MIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    philadelphia
    Posts
    5,839
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by abortionpunch View Post
    I'm not denying that more energy is needed in higher geared system. Provided the energy is available however, the higher geared system will be more efficient at its top end while the top end of the lower geared system will reach a point of diminishing returns, hence the spinning your legs around like a top comment. The electric motor analogy is considerably more sound.

    You seem to be having trouble with physics.

    And gordiep, it's always nice to see someone criticize another for things said that weren't in the kindest tone while simultaneously wishing them harm.
    By energy, you mean torque.

  25. #25
    spin The LT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    My Bikes
    raleigh m-60, azonic steelhead, schwinn world sport fixed gear
    Posts
    1,171
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey abortionpunch go read this paper and then come back and tell us what gear ratios and gearings are most efficient


    Effects of Frictional Loss on Bicycle Chain Drive Efficiency
    Journal of Mechanical Design -- December 2001 -- Volume 123, Issue 4, pp. 598-605
    ABSTRACT: "Chain drive efficiency has been studied to understand energy loss mechanisms in bicycle drive trains, primarily for derailleur-type systems. An analytical study of frictional energy loss mechanisms for chain drives is given along with a series of experimental measurements of chain drive efficiency under a range of power, speed and lubrication conditions. Measurements of mechanical efficiency are compared to infrared measurements indicating that frictional losses cannot account for the observed variations in efficiency. The results of this study indicate that chain tension and sprocket size primarily affect efficiency and that non-thermal loss mechanisms dominate overall chain drive efficiency."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •