Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Should I go threadless?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Should I go threadless?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-07, 07:24 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 770
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Should I go threadless?

I just got my hands on an Iro BFSSFG group buy frame, 1" threaded. I was going to go that route, but I need a short stem, so I was considering going threadless.

I had a lack of funds so I was going to stick w/ threaded, but now I have run into some money and am definitely considering the switch. I'm thinking of getting a 1" carbon fork and getting the star nut and all that setup...

Thoughts? Should I go this route or stick w/ the threaded and attempt to find a quill stem short enough?
knucks is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 07:34 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Threadless will give you a stiffer stem/fork interface, and the option of buying a potentially lighter and stiffer bar/stem combo than what is available for threaded. This is not necessarily important unless you are a sprinter and/or have enough experience to actually be able to notice the difference. Threaded supposedly looks better, but I've learned to like the look of threadless. Threaded on a new frame looks sort of retro-pointless-suboptimal-faux NJS to me. For something as basic as an IRO, I'd just do what's cheapest or most convenient.

Last edited by mihlbach; 11-23-07 at 07:40 PM.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 07:39 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 770
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mihlbach
Threadless will give you a stiffer bar/fork interface, and the option of buying a potentially stiffer bar/stem combo. This is not necessarily important unless you are a sprinter and/or have enough experience to actually be able to notice the difference. Threaded supposedly looks better, but I've learned to like the look of threadless. For something as basic as an IRO, I'd just do what's cheapest or most convenient.
As far as convenience goes, it is easier to find a shorter threadless stem rather than a shorter quill..plus I change bars a lot so that would be nice..

As far as price,like I said, I have enough to cover the cost.
knucks is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 07:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
If you are willing to buy all the parts, you can't go wrong with threadless. Just make sure you don't cut your steerer tube too short. There's nothing wrong with keeping it long enough to put a spacer or two above your stem. Since, you change bars a lot and/or like to experiment with different bar/stem combos, its nice to have the option of raising or lowering your stem.

Personally, I run my stem pretty low, but raise it up (or even flip it) when I plan on doing a really really long ride. I also raise it a bit in the winter to accomodate decreased flexibility due to wearing more clothes. Versatility is your friend.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 07:48 PM
  #5  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by knucks
I just got my hands on an Iro BFSSFG group buy frame, 1" threaded. I was going to go that route, but I need a short stem, so I was considering going threadless.

I had a lack of funds so I was going to stick w/ threaded, but now I have run into some money and am definitely considering the switch. I'm thinking of getting a 1" carbon fork and getting the star nut and all that setup...

Thoughts? Should I go this route or stick w/ the threaded and attempt to find a quill stem short enough?
Complete waste of money.

What is your definition of a "short" quill stem?
operator is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 07:57 PM
  #6  
...
 
thelung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: hell
Posts: 749

Bikes: some piece of s h i t

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
threadless is ugly and pointless unless youre a gram counting *****
thelung is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:05 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Van BC
Posts: 3,744
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by thelung
threadless is ugly and pointless unless youre a gram counting *****
This is not a very useful or well thought out post.
mander is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:11 PM
  #8  
roll'em high
 
shants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: columbus, ohio
Posts: 2,391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
you should just get yourself a nitto deluxe stem:

https://www.benscycle.net/index.php?m...roducts_id=896

you can get the ****ers as short as 50mm. $40 isn't super cheap, admittedly, but arguably better looking and significantly less than you'll spend to cover the bike over to threadless.
shants is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:13 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 770
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
Complete waste of money.

What is your definition of a "short" quill stem?
60mm
knucks is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:16 PM
  #10  
...
 
thelung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: hell
Posts: 749

Bikes: some piece of s h i t

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mander
This is not a very useful or well thought out post.
carbon forks are ugly turds and they will break and kill your tasteless ass. threadless stems are hideous lumps of black aluminum 75% of the time the other 24% are hideous lumps of carbon. maybe 1% look okay. anyway who are you to judge my posts why dont you go ride your probably extremely ugly bike and shut up.
thelung is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:18 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by thelung
carbon forks are ugly turds and they will break and kill your tasteless ass. threadless stems are hideous lumps of black aluminum 75% of the time the other 24% are hideous lumps of carbon. maybe 1% look okay. anyway who are you to judge my posts why dont you go ride your probably extremely ugly bike and shut up.
This is not a very useful or well thought out post.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:23 PM
  #12  
Brakeless
 
Legalize It's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Home of the Hyphy....
Posts: 447

Bikes: Brew, Felt TK2, Masi Coltello, and Unknown French Frame.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts


This is short.
Legalize It is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:25 PM
  #13  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by knucks
60mm
https://www.google.com/products?clien...&oe=utf-8&um=1
operator is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:37 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 770
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I guess for the amount I'd be spending on going threadless I could just get....multiple stems for different bars.
knucks is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:40 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: four 1 OHHH , Maryland
Posts: 2,849

Bikes: nagasawa, fuji track pro

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by knucks
I just got my hands on an Iro BFSSFG group buy frame, 1" threaded. I was going to go that route, but I need a short stem, so I was considering going threadless.

I had a lack of funds so I was going to stick w/ threaded, but now I have run into some money and am definitely considering the switch. I'm thinking of getting a 1" carbon fork and getting the star nut and all that setup...

Thoughts? Should I go this route or stick w/ the threaded and attempt to find a quill stem short enough?
y do u NEED a short stem?
jdms mvp is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:42 PM
  #16  
¡Senor Member!
 
time bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ding ding. and it will look better. good luck.
time bandit is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:43 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 770
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jdms mvp
y do u NEED a short stem?
because i have a short torso + arms
knucks is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 08:54 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
maddyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ky. and FL.
Posts: 3,944

Bikes: KHS steel SS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I prefer servicing threaded.

To me threadless is an answer to a question nobody asked.
maddyfish is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 09:58 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
sfcrossrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760

Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WTF... is this 1994??? Yes you should go threadless. You should also upgrade your BETAmax and 8track.
sfcrossrider is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 10:16 PM
  #20  
Banned.
 
teiaperigosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 40th, up in the 30th
Posts: 1,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
threaded 4 life
teiaperigosa is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 10:23 PM
  #21  
bward1028
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
i'd say biggest advantage to threadless is that there are more stems with removable faceplates that are easily available.
 
Old 11-23-07, 10:27 PM
  #22  
thomas masini lives
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: i aint dh no mo'
Posts: 3,495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
heres the question

do you actually know what stem length and rise you need

and do you plan on changing bars often
?
doofo is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 10:45 PM
  #23  
i am batman
 
gregtheripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thelung
carbon forks are ugly turds and they will break and kill your tasteless ass. threadless stems are hideous lumps of black aluminum 75% of the time the other 24% are hideous lumps of carbon. maybe 1% look okay. anyway who are you to judge my posts why dont you go ride your probably extremely ugly bike and shut up.
you pretty much have no idea what you are talking about.

also, tightening a threadless headset is easy, requires only an allen wrench... plus you don't have to worry about getting the bottom of your stem stuck in your headtube.

1inch stuff isn't as common but it's still widely available. the biggest problem i've had with my threaded setup is the lack of good open faced stems. i finally have a salsa stem that is pretty nice, but it definitely doesn't offer the same flexibility.
gregtheripper is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 10:47 PM
  #24  
thomas masini lives
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: i aint dh no mo'
Posts: 3,495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by gregtheripper
you pretty much have no idea what you are talking about.

also, tightening a threadless headset is easy, requires only an allen wrench... plus you don't have to worry about getting the bottom of your stem stuck in your headtube.

1inch stuff isn't as common but it's still widely available. the biggest problem i've had with my threaded setup is the lack of good open faced stems. i finally have a salsa stem that is pretty nice, but it definitely doesn't offer the same flexibility.

speaking of flexibility can you folks flex the **** out of threaded stems or what

that does not feel efficient
doofo is offline  
Old 11-23-07, 10:55 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 420
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by knucks
60mm
I have a 60mm 2.54 Custom stem in the shed, they are pretty easy to find since alot of old schwinn's and stuff had them. There's a ton of them in the used parts bin at Recycled Cycles in Seattle too.

I like threaded quill stems!

If you can handle 70mm check out the Shimano's ( I just got one and it is beautiful!)

https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/stems.asp
scrub is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.